ChiefsPlanet The Hootie thread - Page 62

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 01-14-2012, 01:11 PM

If we're going to have another 2000 post thread, it may as well be here.

**luv** · 01-15-2012, 02:10 PM

Well, this seems to have gone from a meaningful discussion back to a shit slinging match. I've got laundry to do.

Rams Fan · 01-15-2012, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Backwards Masking

yeah he will.

i can't wait til WhosYou comes back too.

WhosYou is a n00b troll.

Hootie isn't that.

crazycoffey · 01-15-2012, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv

Well, this seems to have gone from a meaningful discussion back to a shit slinging match. I've got laundry to do.

Ok, I'll stop....

|Zach| · 01-15-2012, 02:11 PM

So, on top of someone being surprised that the poll actually counts towards some being banned we have someone in the last 4 who is supposedly this huge troll but the people who should be annoyed that get trolled are coming in telling us it isn't a problem.

patteeu · 01-15-2012, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

It was Pestilence's, actually.

3 of the 4 finalists are completely useless, and the 4th has been going the wrong direction for months. billay was once completely useless, and besides the Hootie crap, he's been tolerable at the very least for months. So, think of the temp bans as a not-so-subtle hint to knock it back a bit. It's not privately held information that pretty much all you have to do in order to not gain the attention of the mods is not be a douche.

Sounds like butthurt from a KU fan rather than objectivity from a moderator.

Backwards Masking · 01-15-2012, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Starbucks Fan

WhosYou is a n00b troll.

Hootie isn't that.

true. but WhosYou was very funny when he lasted.

no one will ever have Hooties Sparkling Resume.

Frazod · 01-15-2012, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu

Sounds like butthurt from a KU fan rather than objectivity from a moderator.

Or somebody who knows a prick when he sees one.

|Zach| · 01-15-2012, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu

Sounds like butthurt from a KU fan rather than objectivity from a moderator.

Even KU fans don't agree with the idea that Saul is a troll.

**dirk digler** · 01-15-2012, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

Or do nothing at all.

Because there is no bannable offense.

I understand banning them for fun for a couple of days but 1 day\vote is over the line IMHO.

Rams Fan · 01-15-2012, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod

Or somebody who knows a prick when he sees one.

Saul isn't a prick.

01-15-2012, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

So, on top of someone being surprised that the poll actually counts towards some being banned we have someone in the last 4 who is supposedly this huge troll but the people who should be annoyed that get trolled are coming in telling us it isn't a problem.

If you don't want him banned, don't vote for him. The top 4 weren't randomly selected. They got put there by their peers.

01-15-2012, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

I understand banning them for fun for a couple of days but 1 day\vote is over the line IMHO.

It's better than the week/month suggestion. That way, if Saul Good doesn't belong in the final four he won't get any votes... or only a couple.

Frazod · 01-15-2012, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach|

Even KU fans don't agree with the idea that Saul is a troll.

Well, one of these doesn't, anyway.

patteeu · 01-15-2012, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

You guys inspired me to grab my computer so I could peck out my thoughts on this one more time.

There are a series of posters here that come on here to do nothing but sling shit, and lay down verbal beat downs. And that's fine. We allow that. However, if all of their joy is derived by coming on here and abusing people all year long, I don't see any harm whatsoever in giving those douchebags a temporary vacation as some sort of vindication for the people that have to put up with their abuse all year. None.

You couldn't walk up to someone smaller than you on the streets and just sock them in the mouth without some kind of punishment. Yet, for some reason it's okay for some of our less intelligent posters to have to deal with that kind of abuse here on a daily basis. This is their vindication in my eyes.

Here's the thing though. If you don't like this, don't vote. If hardly anyone votes in the final poll, do you think we'll do it again next year? Of course not.

All that said, there is no way I would ban anyone who didn't meet that criteria. Of course, they wouldn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning this thing either.

This can be summed up in two words to me: Just desserts.

Just curious. Who are these less intelligent posters that you feel the need to protect. You're talking about Frazod, aren't you?

|Zach| · 01-15-2012, 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

If you don't want him banned, don't vote for him. The top 4 weren't randomly selected. They got put there by their peers.

I don't want it to happen in the first place because the moderating style used to be "less is more"

01-14-2012, 01:11 PM
Mr. Flopnuts FINALLY! The wait is over. Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: The Future Is Now!!! Casino cash: $19947565	The Hootie thread If we're going to have another 2000 post thread, it may as well be here.
Posts: 56,649

01-15-2012, 02:10 PM	#916
luv MY LITTLE #15 Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Springfield, MO Casino cash: $6289600	Well, this seems to have gone from a meaningful discussion back to a shit slinging match. I've got laundry to do.
Posts: 63,424

01-15-2012, 02:11 PM	#919
\|Zach\| For The Glory Of The City Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $5366768	So, on top of someone being surprised that the poll actually counts towards some being banned we have someone in the last 4 who is supposedly this huge troll but the people who should be annoyed that get trolled are coming in telling us it isn't a problem.
Posts: 53,422