NFL Draft 2010 Draft - Page 2

**Tribal Warfare** · 06-14-2009, 09:31 PM

Do you believe that KC will draft a NT with the 1st overall pick ,and dumping Dorsey in the process if the target BPA is a NT when the pick comes ?

I personally believe it's good chance that this will transpire.

Mecca · 06-14-2009, 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Next year's class is loaded at QB but weak defensively.

Don't do that I almost choked on my drink.

**BossChief** · 06-14-2009, 10:34 PM

next years first will likely go to either the offensive or defensive line. The oline has some elderly folk all around and it is highly unlikely all the positions on the dline will be sewn up by years end, solidly anyway.

I still wonder if NE will make another deal with us next year. Seymour and Wilfork are on contract years and they both have replacements in line.

**DeezNutz** · 06-14-2009, 10:36 PM

RT. Maybe guard.

I expect us to be picking the top 10, so there should be some decent options available. We could also think about finding Tony G's replacement.

Nightfyre · 06-14-2009, 10:39 PM

Dorsey is still lining up at DE, right? I could see Terrence Cody being a viable pick up for us. I'm also curious to see how Tebow adapts to a pro system offense this year.

**BossChief** · 06-14-2009, 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

We could also think about finding Tony G's replacement.

if we draft a tight end in the top ten, oh man...

scary but, NE spet a first on a te in a couple drafts.

Heres to hoping Cottam makes it and that isnt an option.

RustShack · 06-14-2009, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

RT. Maybe guard.

I expect us to be picking the top 10, so there should be some decent options available. We could also think about finding Tony G's replacement.

I hope your joking about a Guard in the top ten, and by Tony G's replacement you better not mean TE.

Spicy McHaggis · 06-14-2009, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Next year's class is loaded at QB but weak defensively.

I disagree. Next year should be a great defensive class.

**Kyle DeLexus** · 06-14-2009, 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spicy McHaggis

I disagree. Next year should be a great defensive class.

he was being Deeznuts and messing with everyone.

**CrazyPhuD** · 06-14-2009, 11:55 PM

Well considering that if we're drafting in the top 10 that pendergast will be gone and we likely won't be run 3-4...why would we draft a NT? if we draft DL we'll draft a DE. That's FAR more in demand.

**Kyle DeLexus** · 06-14-2009, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD

Well considering that if we're drafting in the top 10 that pendergast will be gone and we likely won't be run 4-3...why would we draft a NT? if we draft DL we'll draft a DE. That's FAR more in demand.

We took a DE this year, I don't see us taking 3-4 DE 2 years in a row. If we go defense it'll be a safety or a pass rusher IMO.

**Tribal Warfare** · 06-15-2009, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD

why would we draft a NT?

It's the most valued position the 3-4 defense without the opposition will absolutely demolish said defense.

58kcfan89 · 06-15-2009, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

As of today next years WR class is balls unless underclassmen start declaring and even then it's not great.

Eh, there's a lot of time for guys to step up between now & then. Stock rises & falls drastically around the combine & whatnot. The draft that Santonio Holmes was picked in was a weak WR class, but a few good WRs came from that class (Holmes, Greg Jennings, our favorite nutjob Brandon Marshall).

Either way, I expect us to adress LB, WR & DT early in the draft next year, barring any FA signings that would eliminate the need to draft or guys stepping up in '09.

RustShack · 06-15-2009, 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD

Well considering that if we're drafting in the top 10 that pendergast will be gone and we likely won't be run 3-4...why would we draft a NT? if we draft DL we'll draft a DE. That's FAR more in demand.

We aren't running the 3-4 because of Pendegrast, we are running it because of Haley and Pioli.

Mecca · 06-15-2009, 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 58kcfan89

Eh, there's a lot of time for guys to step up between now & then. Stock rises & falls drastically around the combine & whatnot. The draft that Santonio Holmes was picked in was a weak WR class, but a few good WRs came from that class (Holmes, Greg Jennings, our favorite nutjob Brandon Marshall).

Either way, I expect us to adress LB, WR & DT early in the draft next year, barring any FA signings that would eliminate the need to draft or guys stepping up in '09.

Are you a fan of Arellious Benn? Cause he's gonna be the 1st WR picked next year.

Jethopper · 06-15-2009, 02:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Are you a fan of Arellious Benn? Cause he's gonna be the 1st WR picked next year.

Not if Oakland or Detroit is on the clock..

06-14-2009, 09:31 PM
Tribal Warfare The Boom Boom Room Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Far Beyond Comprehension Casino cash: $962813	2010 Draft Do you believe that KC will draft a NT with the 1st overall pick ,and dumping Dorsey in the process if the target BPA is a NT when the pick comes ? I personally believe it's good chance that this will transpire.
Posts: 42,030

06-14-2009, 10:34 PM	#17
BossChief SuperBowl or bust Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: BF Iowa Casino cash: $1914088	next years first will likely go to either the offensive or defensive line. The oline has some elderly folk all around and it is highly unlikely all the positions on the dline will be sewn up by years end, solidly anyway. I still wonder if NE will make another deal with us next year. Seymour and Wilfork are on contract years and they both have replacements in line.
Posts: 47,105

06-14-2009, 10:39 PM	#19
Nightfyre MVP Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Helena, MT Casino cash: $3688849	Dorsey is still lining up at DE, right? I could see Terrence Cody being a viable pick up for us. I'm also curious to see how Tebow adapts to a pro system offense this year.
Posts: 18,534

06-14-2009, 11:55 PM	#24
CrazyPhuD Meow Join Date: Jun 2005 Casino cash: $10005050	Well considering that if we're drafting in the top 10 that pendergast will be gone and we likely won't be run 3-4...why would we draft a NT? if we draft DL we'll draft a DE. That's FAR more in demand. __________________ "Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a trd by the clean end" Last edited by CrazyPhuD; 06-15-2009 at 12:02 AM.. Reason: heh flipped 4-3 with 3-4*
Posts: 8,523