BIG SMILE! New Jersey Nazi Heads Off To Family Court

[gblowfish]

I think he needs a teapot from J.C. Penny....

http://tinyurl.com/lccgsgn

Heath Campbell entered a New Jersey courthouse Monday dressed in a full Nazi uniform, donning a trimmed mustache reminiscent of Adolf Hitler -- the man he named his firstborn child after.

The 40-year-old dad was attending a hearing to ask for visitation rights to his youngest child, 2-year-old Heinrich Hons, who was taken into state custody just hours after his birth in 2011.

Henrich's three Nazi-named siblings -- Adolf Hitler, 7, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation, 6, and 5-year-old Honzlynn Jeannie -- had already been placed in foster care in 2009. The move came a month after the family gained national attention when a ShopRite refused to write "Happy Birthday Adolf Hitler" on a birthday cake.

On Monday before the hearing, Campbell told NBC10, "The world needs to see who I am," when asked what his strategy was in wearing the controversial outfit. "I'm going to tell the judge, I love my children. I wanna be a father, let me be it."

In August 2010, an appeals court ruled that evidence of domestic violence justified the state's decision to remove the children from the Campbell home, according to ABC News.

A year ago, a New Jersey Superior Court judge decided Campbell and his wife, Deborah -- who've since separated -- could not have their children back.

Campbell has always maintained that his kids were taken solely because of their names.

"These kids weren’t abused," he told The Star-Ledger after the 2012 decision, adding, "If I have to give up my Nazism, then so be it. I’ll do it."

A month later, he created a new Nazi organization, "Hitler's Order," according to NBC10, and began wearing the uniform.

Campbell originally told The Associated Press in 2008 that he named his son after Adolf Hitler because he liked the name and "no one else in the world would have [it]."

The media were not allowed inside the court room because of New Jersey family court proceedings policy.

[Planetman]

Achtung Baby

[KChiefer]

Originally Posted by Dayze

so the guy is a moron and idiot. but why did his kids get taken away?

is the name considered abuse by the courts?

Let's put it this way,

The Westboro Church parents get to keep their kids. These assholes don't. Therefore, they must have done something worse than Westboro.

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

I'm as libertarian as anyone around here. Well, maybe not, but I'm pretty libertarian. However, I could buy an argument that these parents are running a cult and these kids are being forced to be part of it. Their behavior is beyond "pleasantly eccentric" or even "weird". It's destructive.

So you're saying they're almost as bad as Democrats?














(And.... off to DC!)

[Just Passin' By]

On a serious note, there's something off about this case, and I'm not talking about the parents:

DYFS (Department of Youth and Family Services) contend that while they originally took the children on the suspicion (and ultimate charge) of parenting incompetence and abuse, they were further kept in DYFS custody because because of domestic abuse. While the case is protected by a gag order, the domestic abuse is thought to be between the parents themselves.

The Campbells deny that any kind of domestic violence took place in their house and claim their children were taken away because of their namesakes, which is illegal. Today, a judge cleared the couple of any child abuse charges, a large victory they thought in their efforts to get their children back. The Campbells say they should get immediate custody back./

http://www.imperfectparent.com/topic...abuse-charges/

[Backwards Masking]

Originally Posted by KChiefer

Westboro Church parents get to keep their kids. These assholes don't. Therefore, they must have done something worse than Westboro.

outside of the single solitary domestic violence charge I'm not finding a difference

maybe Tax exempt assholes > Tax paying assholes (if tax paying assholes were employed), there's that i guess

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

On a serious note, there's something off about this case, and I'm not talking about the parents:



http://www.imperfectparent.com/topic...abuse-charges/

2011, bruh. I'm guessing things may have changed since that time.

[Just Passin' By]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

2011, bruh. I'm guessing things may have changed since that time.

The importance of that link is that they were found not guilty of child abuse and still not given their children back.

[warpaint*]

Gag order makes it pretty difficult to answer the question as to what they've done. I gave the court the benefit of the doubt as a result.