|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which position group of today's players would most change the 1940s NFL? | |||
| Halfbacks and fullbacks |
   
|
3 | 6.67% |
| Quarterbacks |
  
|
2 | 4.44% |
| Wide receivers and tight ends |
  
|
4 | 8.89% |
| Offensive linemen |
  
|
14 | 31.11% |
| Kickers, punters, returners and kick coverage/return teams. |
  
|
1 | 2.22% |
| Cornerbacks and safeties |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Linebackers (inside and outside) |
|
0 | 0% |
| Defensive linement (ends and tackles) |
|
16 | 35.56% |
| None of these would significantly change the game. It's a wash. |
|
1 | 2.22% |
| Today's pansy players couldn't have even started in the 1940s. |
|
4 | 8.89% |
| I don't know! On three! Hut! Hut! Hut! |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-11-2009, 08:49 PM
|
Topic Starter |
|
NFL's #1 Ermines Fan
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $3348491
 VARSITY
|
Which position group today would most dominate the 1940s?
We hear a lot how the players of the game today are more evolved than the players of yesteryear. So that begs the question: if you could transport NFL players of today back to the 1940s, which of the following position groups would MOST change the game?
Poll forthcoming. Two rules: 1. Assume that they must follow the coaching strategies of the 1940s. (I pondered putting coaches as an option, but decided to keep the poll uncomplicated.) 2. Assume that they would not be two-way players, but would play their normal positions. |
|
Posts: 141,251
  |
|
|
|
Which position group today would most dominate the 1940s?
Threaded Mode