Any patent lawyers on the board?

[Fat Elvis]

I've googled it, but I haven't found a definitive answer; can you patent a method or a process?

[FAX]

Yes.

FAX

[ClevelandBronco]

I'm going to have to disagree with Mr. FAX on this. Unless you have a special piece of software or hardware that's a key to the process, my understanding is that you cannot be protected by patent.

For instance, if you come up with a new way to milk a goat using only a screwdriver, good for you, but anyone can do it since screwdrivers exist, goats exist and getting milk from them is already done.

[Fairplay]

No

[Bugeater]

Yes, please share your idea with me.

[teedubya]

No.


Yes.

[FAX]

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco

I'm going to have to disagree with Mr. FAX on this. Unless you have a special piece of software or hardware that's a key to the process, my understanding is that you cannot be protected by patent.

For instance, if you come up with a new way to milk a goat using only a screwdriver, good for you, but anyone can do it since screwdrivers exist, goats exist and getting milk from them is already done.

I'm going to have to disagree with your disagreement, Mr. ClevelandBronco. I was one of the founders of a company that acquired a process patent. I remember it well because it cost us a bloody fortune. In our case, it was a video production process that utilized existing technologies (hardware and software). The process, however, was deemed sufficiently unique that the patent was awarded.

FAX

[ClevelandBronco]

Originally Posted by FAX

I'm going to have to disagree with your disagreement, Mr. ClevelandBronco. I was one of the founders of a company that acquired a process patent. I remember it well because it cost us a bloody fortune. In our case, it was a video production process that utilized existing technologies (hardware and software). The process, however, was deemed sufficiently unique that the patent was awarded.

FAX

I bow to your experience.

[FAX]

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco

I bow to your experience.

And I bow to your bowing.

FAX

[Bugeater]

Originally Posted by Ari Chi3fs

No.


Yes.

Maybe.

[acesn8s]

Originally Posted by FAX

And I bow to your bowing.

FAX

Damn Japanese

[Fat Elvis]

Originally Posted by FAX

I'm going to have to disagree with your disagreement, Mr. ClevelandBronco. I was one of the founders of a company that acquired a process patent. I remember it well because it cost us a bloody fortune. In our case, it was a video production process that utilized existing technologies (hardware and software). The process, however, was deemed sufficiently unique that the patent was awarded.

FAX

Mr. Fax, you may well be my new BFF. The particular process that I am thinking about patenting utilizes existing hardware and software, but my method utilizes it in a field that is completely unrelated to what it was originally intended, and it is unique within the field that I would apply the process.

[FAX]

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

Mr. Fax, you may well be my new BFF. The particular process that I am thinking about patenting utilizes existing hardware and software, but my method utilizes it in a field that is completely unrelated to what it was originally intended, and it is unique within the field that I would apply the process.

As I mentioned, Mr. Fat Elvis, ours was a "process" that utilized existing technologies. Heck, as far as I know, other people were using the same "process" that we patented ... we just filed the patent in order to create value in the company. And, because no one else had taken the time or initiative to file previously, we go it through. It cost a lot of money, though ... not sure it was worth it in the end.

So far as I am aware, the process must be unique and withstand a search ... the search is the most expensive part, as I recall. What am I saying? Every part was expensive.

As for the "field" in which the process would be applied, I'm not certain you could patent that part. In other words, it's the unique process itself that can be patented ... not the application. Then again, I'm not a patent attorney so please seek professional guidance.

FAX

[Amnorix]

You can definitely patent a particular process. I agree with Fax that I'm concerned about trying to patent a process just for use in a previously unexploited field. My understanding, like his, is that the process itself should be unique, not it's application. But though I'm an attorney I'm not a patent attorney, which is a highly specialized field.

And, as Fax also said, getting a patent is not an inexpensive process.

And I think Fax also said something about you seeking professional guidance. That is definitely the right idea as well.

So, in short, I could've just posted his response and replied "This", but I figured I should type alot more words to achieve teh same result instead.

[Bugeater]

Originally Posted by Amnorix

You can definitely patent a particular process. I agree with Fax that I'm concerned about trying to patent a process just for use in a previously unexploited field. My understanding, like his, is that the process itself should be unique, not it's application. But though I'm an attorney I'm not a patent attorney, which is a highly specialized field.

And, as Fax also said, getting a patent is not an inexpensive process.

And I think Fax also said something about you seeking professional guidance. That is definitely the right idea as well.

So, in short, I could've just posted his response and replied "This", but I figured I should type alot more words to achieve teh same result instead.

This.