Football Pouting in San Diego - Page 6

LaChapelle · 09-02-2009, 07:23 AM

L.T. proclaims he's "the best back"
Posted by Tom Curran on September 2, 2009 9:13 AM ET (PFT)

The fact that he has turned 30 doesn't mean LaDainian Tomlinson's too old to engage in a little "neener, neener, neener."

Speaking to Sam Farmer of the Los Angeles Times, Tomlinson flashed jealousy about a recent Sporting News article in which Jim Brown interviewed Adrian Peterson.

One question posed by Brown suggests that Tomlinson is overrated.

The article, in which Brown says he believes Peterson is "the most complete back he's seen in a long time," was given to Tomlinson by a Chargers staffer.

"I was sitting there reading it thinking, 'Wow,' " Tomlinson told Farmer. "The difference with me is you can put me out on that field and there will be nothing I can't do. I won't have to come off the field. Adrian has to come off sometimes on third down. Running routes, he's still not there yet. Great downhill runner, powerful, fast, all that stuff. . . .

"But anything on that field you want me to do -- throw it, block -- I can do it. That's what I pride myself on is not having any weaknesses. And that's what makes me the best back."

It's a predictable response from Tomlinson. In 2006, he was being touted as the heir apparent to Brown. Two injury-marred seasons later, and Brown's prodding Peterson to call L.T. overrated while they sip lemonade on the veranda.

Given the pride Tomlinson takes in his craft, making sure L.T. read all about it was, in the short-term, a wise motivational move by the Chargers.

But if it causes him to push too hard from September through December, leaving him used up and/or injured come the playoffs, the smarter move might have been to put the thing in a box marked "Do not open until Christmas."

KCrockaholic · 09-02-2009, 08:00 PM

Bigger man-crush = GoChiefs

Better back in 09' = LJ

Darren Sproles>LT in 09'

LT is basically done. He will probably go down again, then realize Adrian Puh Puh Puh Peterson is the best back in the entire league!

Ugly Duck · 09-03-2009, 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe

LT can do anything. Except play hurt.

Mecca · 09-03-2009, 02:58 AM

Most teams would love to have "Tomlinson's bad year" he is declining because of his overall number of touches and age but he is good enough at every facet of the game to remain a valuable piece to have. He is today a better player than Larry Johnson but that isn't saying a whole lot which is why that argument is baffling.

He is a more complete back than Peterson but he isn't that kind of runner anymore. Also for Peterson and all the talk and records etc, he has to show he's durable. For a RB Tomlinson has been remarkably durable where Peterson's past points to durability problems.

Tomlinson is not a great back anymore, he's a good back that does all of the little things that help you win games.

Peterson is a great runner he just isn't nearly as polished in all facets of the game we'll see if that comes in time. Larry Johnson never learned those things.

kcxiv · 09-03-2009, 03:13 AM

LT was the best back in the NFL. Age happens to everyone Tomlinson. I wont ever say he is L.T thats will always be reserved for Lawrence Taylor.

Anyways, great back, but its Peterson's time.

I dont even know why the **** people are Discussing L.J in this league anymore. LJ had 2 good years and that was it. Hell, Priest more then that. lol

**kysirsoze** · 09-03-2009, 03:18 AM

It's possible that LJ will exceed LT this year, but that's it. Anyone on here who thinks LJ is anywhere near the same level as LT overall is the definition of "homer".

Mecca · 09-03-2009, 03:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kysirsoze

It's possible that LJ will exceed LT this year, but that's it. Anyone on here who thinks LJ is anywhere near the same level as LT overall is the definition of "homer".

I'd be stunned if LJ came close honestly...Tomlinson is on a better team with a better line with a better QB etc etc etc.

His bad year still was considerably better than LJ's year.

XXXshogunXXX · 09-03-2009, 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SDChiefs

Every Charger fan I know says hes done and wanted to let him go over Turner. Plus the argument that LT is better because he produced more yds doesn't make sense. He touched the ball for 85% of their plays for a lot of years because he was all they had. LJ was used as RB which his title is. LT was used as QB/RB/WR/TE/FB because they had no one else shoulder the load. Now that they do, his numbers have declined to the point no one even talks about him anymore. Its all about Sproles if you walk down the street.

does that SD stand for South Dakota? everyone here in SAN DIEGO Ive talked to still loves Tomlinson

the bold makes zero sense

LaChapelle · 09-03-2009, 04:43 AM

What have you did for me lately league.

TheGuardian · 09-03-2009, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LaChapelle

L.T. proclaims he's "the best back"
Posted by Tom Curran on September 2, 2009 9:13 AM ET (PFT)

The fact that he has turned 30 doesn't mean LaDainian Tomlinson's too old to engage in a little "neener, neener, neener."

Speaking to Sam Farmer of the Los Angeles Times, Tomlinson flashed jealousy about a recent Sporting News article in which Jim Brown interviewed Adrian Peterson.

One question posed by Brown suggests that Tomlinson is overrated.

The article, in which Brown says he believes Peterson is "the most complete back he's seen in a long time," was given to Tomlinson by a Chargers staffer.

"I was sitting there reading it thinking, 'Wow,' " Tomlinson told Farmer. "The difference with me is you can put me out on that field and there will be nothing I can't do. I won't have to come off the field. Adrian has to come off sometimes on third down. Running routes, he's still not there yet. Great downhill runner, powerful, fast, all that stuff. . . .

"But anything on that field you want me to do -- throw it, block -- I can do it. That's what I pride myself on is not having any weaknesses. And that's what makes me the best back."

It's a predictable response from Tomlinson. In 2006, he was being touted as the heir apparent to Brown. Two injury-marred seasons later, and Brown's prodding Peterson to call L.T. overrated while they sip lemonade on the veranda.

Given the pride Tomlinson takes in his craft, making sure L.T. read all about it was, in the short-term, a wise motivational move by the Chargers.

But if it causes him to push too hard from September through December, leaving him used up and/or injured come the playoffs, the smarter move might have been to put the thing in a box marked "Do not open until Christmas."

Tomlinson could NEVER run with power. Between the tackles he was merely average.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-03-2009, 09:39 AM

What's the over/under this year on playoff bench-sulking with the Darth Vader helmet on?

Mr. Krab · 09-03-2009, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown

FaFaFaFaFaFaFaFaFaFaFaFaFaFaF uck you, LT

Sincerely,
Darren Sproles

That's cold.

**The Franchise** · 09-03-2009, 10:29 AM

I'd take LT over LJ every time.

Then again....I had LT on my FF team for his monster season....and I won $1500. So I'm kind of biased.

OctoberFart · 09-03-2009, 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian

Tomlinson could NEVER run with power. Between the tackles he was merely average.

BS he doesn't have the total TD record because he is a bad/average between the tackles runner. Only a Queeef fan would ever think Diaper Boy is better than LT. He never has been and never will be. In fact Diaper Boy is one of the most hyped overrated, overpaid, 2 1000 yd year RB's ever to lace it up.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 09-03-2009, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AutumnWind

BS he doesn't have the total TD record because he is a bad/average between the tackles runner. Only a Queeef fan would ever think Diaper Boy is better than LT. He never has been and never will be. In fact Diaper Boy is one of the most hyped overrated, overpaid, 2 1000 yd year RB's ever to lace it up.

Numbers aside, they're both equally useless when you really need them, whatever the situation may be.

TheGuardian · 09-03-2009, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AutumnWind

BS he doesn't have the total TD record because he is a bad/average between the tackles runner. Only a Queeef fan would ever think Diaper Boy is better than LT. He never has been and never will be. In fact Diaper Boy is one of the most hyped overrated, overpaid, 2 1000 yd year RB's ever to lace it up.

I never even mentioned Larry Johnson.

Having the TD record in a season doesn't have shit to do with running with power. Shaun Alexander had the record before Tomlinson and he's one of the softest runners of all time. So basically you're an idiot.

09-02-2009, 07:23 AM
LaChapelle Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $10004900	Pouting in San Diego L.T. proclaims he's "the best back" Posted by Tom Curran on September 2, 2009 9:13 AM ET (PFT) The fact that he has turned 30 doesn't mean LaDainian Tomlinson's too old to engage in a little "neener, neener, neener." Speaking to Sam Farmer of the Los Angeles Times, Tomlinson flashed jealousy about a recent Sporting News article in which Jim Brown interviewed Adrian Peterson. One question posed by Brown suggests that Tomlinson is overrated. The article, in which Brown says he believes Peterson is "the most complete back he's seen in a long time," was given to Tomlinson by a Chargers staffer. "I was sitting there reading it thinking, 'Wow,' " Tomlinson told Farmer. "The difference with me is you can put me out on that field and there will be nothing I can't do. I won't have to come off the field. Adrian has to come off sometimes on third down. Running routes, he's still not there yet. Great downhill runner, powerful, fast, all that stuff. . . . "But anything on that field you want me to do -- throw it, block -- I can do it. That's what I pride myself on is not having any weaknesses. And that's what makes me the best back." It's a predictable response from Tomlinson. In 2006, he was being touted as the heir apparent to Brown. Two injury-marred seasons later, and Brown's prodding Peterson to call L.T. overrated while they sip lemonade on the veranda. Given the pride Tomlinson takes in his craft, making sure L.T. read all about it was, in the short-term, a wise motivational move by the Chargers. But if it causes him to push too hard from September through December, leaving him used up and/or injured come the playoffs, the smarter move might have been to put the thing in a box marked "Do not open until Christmas."
Posts: 8,588

09-02-2009, 08:00 PM	#76
KCrockaholic Sarcasm Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Olathe Casino cash: $4792900	Bigger man-crush = GoChiefs Better back in 09' = LJ Darren Sproles>LT in 09' LT is basically done. He will probably go down again, then realize Adrian Puh Puh Puh Peterson is the best back in the entire league!
Posts: 21,133

09-03-2009, 02:58 AM	#78
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $2647050	Most teams would love to have "Tomlinson's bad year" he is declining because of his overall number of touches and age but he is good enough at every facet of the game to remain a valuable piece to have. He is today a better player than Larry Johnson but that isn't saying a whole lot which is why that argument is baffling. He is a more complete back than Peterson but he isn't that kind of runner anymore. Also for Peterson and all the talk and records etc, he has to show he's durable. For a RB Tomlinson has been remarkably durable where Peterson's past points to durability problems. Tomlinson is not a great back anymore, he's a good back that does all of the little things that help you win games. Peterson is a great runner he just isn't nearly as polished in all facets of the game we'll see if that comes in time. Larry Johnson never learned those things.
Posts: 110,779

09-03-2009, 03:13 AM	#79
kcxiv In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Central Valley, Cali Casino cash: $8807996	LT was the best back in the NFL. Age happens to everyone Tomlinson. I wont ever say he is L.T thats will always be reserved for Lawrence Taylor. Anyways, great back, but its Peterson's time. I dont even know why the **** people are Discussing L.J in this league anymore. LJ had 2 good years and that was it. Hell, Priest more then that. lol
Posts: 29,110

09-03-2009, 03:18 AM	#80
kysirsoze SNAP THE ****ING BALL!!! Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $3786946	It's possible that LJ will exceed LT this year, but that's it. Anyone on here who thinks LJ is anywhere near the same level as LT overall is the definition of "homer".
Posts: 11,283

09-03-2009, 04:43 AM	#83
LaChapelle Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $10004900	What have you did for me lately league.
Posts: 8,588

09-03-2009, 09:39 AM	#85
Sweet Daddy Hate Unsparing Join Date: Aug 2008 Casino cash: $10004900	What's the over/under this year on playoff bench-sulking with the Darth Vader helmet on? __________________ 1. Merciless, severe. 2. Given freely and generously. 100% refusal to overrate 20 year Head Coaches with ZERO **ing rings as a Head Coach. CP's Official Professor of 'Dem Blues for 2019/2020!**
Posts: 77,135

09-03-2009, 10:29 AM	#87
The Franchise Most Valuable Villain Join Date: Dec 2006 Casino cash: $3135047	I'd take LT over LJ every time. Then again....I had LT on my FF team for his monster season....and I won $1500. So I'm kind of biased.
Posts: 91,991