Albert just called 610. Wants to stay in KC

[Red Dawg]

Agent is talking to Dorsey. Does not want to play guard. Health is good. For what its worth.

[Hootie]

I'll wait to see how the first 34 picks play out but if we don't have 1 QB by then and 1 QB I like I'm going to be irritated and I usually don't get irritated on draft day because I realize it's a crapshoot and teams like Seattle who HAD THE WORST DRAFT EVER!! doesn't mean shit until you actually see the players play

shit, everyone on this board LOVED the Johnny Baldwin pick

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

They will take a QB in the draft. I am sure of that. I really think it will be in the first round but, it won't be at #1 overall.

[Rambozo]

Originally Posted by Peyton's Princess

I'll wait to see how the first 34 picks play out but if we don't have 1 QB by then and 1 QB I like I'm going to be irritated and I usually don't get irritated on draft day because I realize it's a crapshoot and teams like Seattle who HAD THE WORST DRAFT EVER!! doesn't mean shit until you actually see the players play

shit, everyone on this board LOVED the Johnny Baldwin pick

I am with you. I expect one in the first 34 picks.

I hated the Baldwin pick and wanted Phil Taylor or Gabe Carimi. However, neither of them have been very good either.

[Bump]

Oh good now we can finally move Albert to OG and draft that OT Joekul or whatever his name is!!

/people suffering from TSF

[BigCatDaddy]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

Learning curve.

You are overthinking this. QBs are given more time to develop than any other position and for good reason. It's the hardest position to transition from college to pro. While you are waiting to find out for 2, 3, 4, or 5 years for your mediocre QB to develop, you are missing out on real ones. By the time you do try again, the players you drafted after him are ready to hit free agency.

You can say we should draft a QB year after year until we get one but, that's not going to happen. it's not realistic to do that over and over in the first round. If you do, your team will get old or leave via free agency and you won't have anything but a QB. You aren't going to be the Colts if you do that. It's not about money. It's about the loss of talent.

You guys can dream all night and day but, reality is very different. I think most Chiefs fans get it. For some reason, there are a lot of people here who don't. Maybe it's the stupid first round QB in Superbowls argument?

If you are a Chiefs fan, you shouldn't even be talking about a superbowl let alone a playoff win. You are like little kids asking for a b-day pony. It ain't going to happen guys. You can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit.

You did see that Blaine Gabbert got yanked before he even finished year 2? With the new CBA teams aren't shelling out big bucks for top of the draft QB's so it's much easier to pull the plug earlier then it used to be.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy

You did see that Blaine Gabbert got yanked before he even finished year 2?

Don't bother. He lives in his own world where QBs are scary and 1st round playoff losses are the bee's knees.

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by RunKC

Bowe caught 15 TD's you stupid ****. Your Bronco WR's had way more drops than Bowe did this year.

I believe he said WRs "under contract." I wish posters here would take time to think before posting insults.

And I believe he said he's been a fan of the Chiefs for 37 years. That rules out knowmo.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Frankie

I believe he said WRs "under contract." I wish posters here would take time to think before posting insults.

And I believe he said he's been a fan of the Chiefs for 37 years. That rules out knowmo.

Doesn't rule out being a complete moron though.

[Frankie]

Originally Posted by Hog Farmer

Rambozo has just regained the lead for poster most likely to swallow elephant semen at the next tailgate.

Oh he's Republican? Oops I forgot this is not DC.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

On defense, we need a CB, 2 DEs, a MLB, and a FS. What about offense? Do we have a WR under contract that can catch? How about a TE that can stay healthy? What about a LT? Do we have one of those under contract? How about an o-line that can pass block? What about a center?

Before you start with the Powe and Bailey etc. BS, just think about how they couldn't get on the field on a 2-14 team. Romeo has been coaching in this league forever. yeah, it didn't work out but he's not a dumbass.

You really think a QB is going to fix everything homer?

A QB in this league fixes everything for most teams. The Chiefs have the potential to be no different than the Andrew Luck Colts, Kurt Warner Cardinals, or the Brett Favre Vikings

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

Yeah but, Clark won't. I think that has been proven. It's not your money and it's not your job on the line. Think about it. Half of a GM's decison on a draft pick comes down to him watching his ass. The longer they've been there, the more they gamble.

Is that why new GMs with the potential to draft a QB in the first round take a guy nearly 100% of the time?

Do you think the guy who inherited the 0-16 Lions said, "Can't take Matthew Stafford because our entire defense is terrible!"

Should the only teams who draft QBs be like the Bill Cowher Steelers in 2004 with EVERYTHING in place before they put in the QB?

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Frankie

I believe he said WRs "under contract." I wish posters here would take time to think before posting insults.

And I believe he said he's been a fan of the Chiefs for 37 years. That rules out knowmo.

Quit defending him, dude. He does this shit in all ****ing threads.

This thread is about how Albert's agent is in talks with Dorsey and Reid, and how Albert WANTS TO BE BACK IN KC. And then Rambozo says, "People mention LT as a need because Donald Stephenson is our only LT under contract."

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by SNR

Should the only teams who draft QBs be like the Bill Cowher Steelers in 2004 with EVERYTHING in place before they put in the QB?

Gotta love the 15-year plan.

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Groundhog day. Every QB the Chiefs "could" take is a worthless piece of shit, but anyone unattainable is "can't miss". "He's no Marino!!!!" "Hey we can always wait till next year till ______ comes out"/every year since the stone ages apparently.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

Learning curve.

You are overthinking this. QBs are given more time to develop than any other position and for good reason. It's the hardest position to transition from college to pro. While you are waiting to find out for 2, 3, 4, or 5 years for your mediocre QB to develop, you are missing out on real ones. By the time you do try again, the players you drafted after him are ready to hit free agency.

You can say we should draft a QB year after year until we get one but, that's not going to happen. it's not realistic to do that over and over in the first round. If you do, your team will get old or leave via free agency and you won't have anything but a QB. You aren't going to be the Colts if you do that. It's not about money. It's about the loss of talent.

You guys can dream all night and day but, reality is very different. I think most Chiefs fans get it. For some reason, there are a lot of people here who don't. Maybe it's the stupid first round QB in Superbowls argument?

If you are a Chiefs fan, you shouldn't even be talking about a superbowl let alone a playoff win. You are like little kids asking for a b-day pony. It ain't going to happen guys. You can't make chicken salad out of chicken shit.

My daughter got a pony for her birthday.

Once again you are ****ing wrong.
Posted via Mobile Device