Chiefs Chiefs might face QB Jeff Tuel Sunday. - Page 21

ShowtimeSBMVP · 08:11 PM

Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora 52s
Jeff Tuel will start at QB tomorrow for the Bills against the Chiefs. Matt Flynn is the No. 2. Thad Lewis is doubtful

ThaVirus · 11-02-2013, 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks

Jesus, it seems no one on this board understands the concept of timing when it comes to schedules...

I understand that being 8-0 against 2nd and 3rd string QBs is quite an accomplishment. Beating a worthy opponent at least once would be nice though wouldn't it, ass bleeder?

Timing like when we played Dallas when they were 1-0?

Timing like when we played the Eagles when they were considered decent?

Timing like when we played the Titans when they were 3-1 then went to Seattle and almost beat the Seahawks the week after?

Hammock Parties · 11-02-2013, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks

Jesus, it seems no one on this board understands the concept of timing when it comes to schedules...

I understand that being 8-0 against 2nd and 3rd string QBs is quite an accomplishment. Beating a worthy opponent at least once would be nice though, wouldn't it, ass bleeder?

Your fan base must be absolutely sick with all the good fortune the Chiefs have gotten this year, eh?

I mean, if by some stroke of luck we do get the first seed by beating the good teams on our schedule, all those easy wins against the bottom feeders are gonna heat my balls all ****ing winter.

Thank you football Gods!

It would truly be amazing if the stars aligned for a Chiefs Super Bowl run this year...all because of those beautiful second and third-string QBs that made our road to the championship paved with gold and pussy!

Ciao!

ShowtimeSBMVP · 11-02-2013, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks

Jesus, it seems no one on this board understands the concept of timing when it comes to schedules...

I understand that being 8-0 against 2nd and 3rd string QBs is quite an accomplishment. Beating a worthy opponent at least once would be nice though wouldn't it, ass bleeder?

Fitzpatrick- played 2 games Home vs KC and @Seattle and Almost won
Keenum- played 1 game who knows how he'll turn out
Campbell- Is the best QB the Browns have. Not really a back-up.

Eli ,Romo ,Vick ,Gabbert , Pryor(Same QB that smoked you)

**Gadzooks** · 11-02-2013, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead

Your fan base must be absolutely sick with all the good fortune the Chiefs have gotten this year, eh?

I mean, if by some stroke of luck we do get the first seed by beating the good teams on our schedule, all those easy wins against the bottom feeders are gonna heat my balls all ****ing winter.

Thank you football Gods!

It would truly be amazing if the stars aligned for a Chiefs Super Bowl run this year...all because of those beautiful second and third-string QBs that made our road to the championship paved with gold and pussy!

Ciao!

At least you get it. The first seed is your only hope.

AussieChiefsFan · 11-02-2013, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks

Jesus, it seems no one on this board understands the concept of timing when it comes to schedules...

I understand that being 8-0 against 2nd and 3rd string QBs is quite an accomplishment. Beating a worthy opponent at least once would be nice though, wouldn't it, ass bleeder?

Okay then.

First Chargers loss. Texans. They would have had Shuab right? I would have been more than happy for our D to go up against Shaub. He probably would have thrown a couple pick sixes for us, disguising our offense even further.

Second loss. Titans. I assume Locker was still in at this stage, so you have a point with this one.

Third loss. Raiders. This one might actually work against your argument, if Pryor wasn't the starter yet. If Pryor WAS the starter, well, you guys still lost and we didn't.

Okay, let's look at mutual wins.

First win. Eagles. Vick still in. KC by 10, SD by 3.

Second win. KC by 1, SD by 9. Austin out. Fair enough, first game where point margin in SDs favor.

Fourth win. Jags. KC by 26. SD by 18. Not really much use in analyzing this one. both teams likely stopped going 100% once they were up by 20. Only thing could possibly take away is that KC horrible O scored more than SDs much better O. I dunno.

Anyway, good lot of difference timing made.

AussieChiefsFan · 11-02-2013, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

Fitzpatrick- played 2 games Home vs KC and @Seattle and Almost won
Keenum- played 1 game who knows how he'll turn out
Campbell- Is the best QB the Browns have. Not really a back-up.

Eli ,Romo ,Vick ,Gabbert , Pryor(Same QB that smoked you)

Oh, and this.

Strongside · 11-02-2013, 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks

Jesus, it seems no one on this board understands the concept of timing when it comes to schedules...

I understand that being 8-0 against 2nd and 3rd string QBs is quite an accomplishment. Beating a worthy opponent at least once would be nice though, wouldn't it, ass bleeder?

You're a ****ing moron. We've faced 3 backup quarterbacks. One was making his first start ever...the other 2 were guys that have had some success as starters in the NFL. Jason Campbell and Ryand Fitzpatrick, while not world-beaters, are not complete slouches. In the midst of all of this...we've faced Tony Romo, Eli Manning, Mike Vick, and Terelle Pryor (Who is playing well).

There are other aspects of a team other than the quarterback position. Hell, see the Chiefs for a prime example. We're winning DESPITE getting mediocre quarterback play. Some of the teams that we've beaten, while not boasting great quarterbacks, are still playing solid defense and running the ball well.

Don't be so ****ing butthurt because your team isn't capable of shutting down an opposing offense. We're not winning games because we're playing shitty quarterbacks every week...and to say so shows your football IQ (or lack thereof). We are winning games because our defense reaches into an opposing team's chest, rips their heart out, and eats it in front of their ****ing faces.

You don't get to 8-0 in the NFL by being a bad team. I don't care who you play. If the teams that we've played so far are all so horrible, then why have several of them beaten teams that many consider to be good...including your Syphillis Rivers-lead Chargers?

**Gadzooks** · 11-02-2013, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

Fitzpatrick- played 2 games Home vs KC and @Seattle and Almost won
Keenum- played 1 game who knows how he'll turn out
Campbell- Is the best QB the Browns have. Not really a back-up.

Eli ,Romo ,Vick ,Gabbert , Pryor(Same QB that smoked you)

Fitz was cut by the Bills 'cause he sucks.
Keenum's first NFL game after not being good enough to hold the clipboard.

If Campbell was so good the Chiefs would have spent 2 second round draft picks for him. Hoyer is their QB.

Nice try though.

Strongside · 11-02-2013, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks

Fitz was cut by the Bills 'cause he sucks.
Keenum's first NFL game after not being good enough to hold the clipboard.

If Campbell was so good the Chiefs would have spent 2 second round draft picks for him. Hoyer is their QB.

Nice try though.

Can't wait until you guys lose your next 5 straight so you can crawl back into your hole.

**Gadzooks** · 11-02-2013, 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside

You're a ****ing moron. We've faced 3 backup quarterbacks. One was making his first start ever...the other 2 were guys that have had some success as starters in the NFL. Jason Campbell and Ryand Fitzpatrick, while not world-beaters, are not complete slouches. In the midst of all of this...we've faced Tony Romo, Eli Manning, Mike Vick, and Terelle Pryor (Who is playing well).

There are other aspects of a team other than the quarterback position. Hell, see the Chiefs for a prime example. We're winning DESPITE getting mediocre quarterback play. Some of the teams that we've beaten, while not boasting great quarterbacks, are still playing solid defense and running the ball well.

Don't be so ****ing butthurt because your team isn't capable of shutting down an opposing offense. We're not winning games because we're playing shitty quarterbacks every week...and to say so shows your football IQ (or lack thereof). We are winning games because our defense reaches into an opposing team's chest, rips their heart out, and eats it in front of their ****ing faces.

You don't get to 8-0 in the NFL by being a bad team. I don't care who you play. If the teams that we've played so far are all so horrible, then why have several of them beaten teams that many consider to be good...including your Syphillis Rivers-lead Chargers?

Back off the roids brah. You'd make a good Turd fan.

AussieChiefsFan · 11-02-2013, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strongside

You're a ****ing moron. We've faced 3 backup quarterbacks. One was making his first start ever...the other 2 were guys that have had some success as starters in the NFL. Jason Campbell and Ryand Fitzpatrick, while not world-beaters, are not complete slouches. In the midst of all of this...we've faced Tony Romo, Eli Manning, Mike Vick, and Terelle Pryor (Who is playing well).

There are other aspects of a team other than the quarterback position. Hell, see the Chiefs for a prime example. We're winning DESPITE getting mediocre quarterback play. Some of the teams that we've beaten, while not boasting great quarterbacks, are still playing solid defense and running the ball well.

Don't be so ****ing butthurt because your team isn't capable of shutting down an opposing offense. We're not winning games because we're playing shitty quarterbacks every week...and to say so shows your football IQ (or lack thereof). We are winning games because our defense reaches into an opposing team's chest, rips their heart out, and eats it in front of their ****ing faces.

You don't get to 8-0 in the NFL by being a bad team. I don't care who you play. If the teams that we've played so far are all so horrible, then why have several of them beaten teams that many consider to be good...including your Syphillis Rivers-lead Chargers?

Dayum.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 11-02-2013, 10:52 PM

Gadzooks mad. He be mad and shit.

Strongside · 11-02-2013, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks

Back of the roids brah. You'd make a good Turd fan.

wut

**Gadzooks** · 11-02-2013, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate

Gadzooks mad. He be mad and shit.

I'm not mad, you silly.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 11-02-2013, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadzooks

I'm not mad you silly.

U mad bro. Grrrrrrrrrrr and shit.

10-30-2013, 11:39 AM
ShowtimeSBMVP Chiefs Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $3686009	Chiefs might face QB Jeff Tuel Sunday. Jason La Canfora ‏@JasonLaCanfora 52s Jeff Tuel will start at QB tomorrow for the Bills against the Chiefs. Matt Flynn is the No. 2. Thad Lewis is doubtful Last edited by ShowtimeSBMVP; 11-02-2013 at 08:11 PM..
Posts: 23,752

11-02-2013, 10:52 PM	#312
Sweet Daddy Hate Unsparing Join Date: Aug 2008 Casino cash: $10004900	Gadzooks mad. He be mad and shit. __________________ 1. Merciless, severe. 2. Given freely and generously. 100% refusal to overrate 20 year Head Coaches with ZERO **ing rings as a Head Coach. CP's Official Professor of 'Dem Blues for 2019/2020!**
Posts: 77,135