Chiefs Scott Pioli on Bob Fescoe - Page 14

ShowtimeSBMVP · 06:33 PM

http://www.610sports.com/topic/play_...udioId=5634051

Man loves Cassel he will be the QB in 2012. Pioli thinks cassel is good I'm sure that is a fireable offense Hunt.

Chief Roundup · 01-12-2012, 09:18 AM

Watching and listening to the Jack Harry Interview. I noticed in the first segment that Pioli said he is a strong believer in letting a HC name and put together his own staff.

**The Bad Guy** · 01-12-2012, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kyle DeLexus

Steelers in '09?

Steelers did not have a winning record that year.

jd1020 · 01-12-2012, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Steelers did not have a winning record that year.

9-7?

Agent V · 01-12-2012, 09:30 AM

How do we go about protesting this?

htismaqe · 01-12-2012, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda

It won't happen and the front office knows it won't. They will pass on stud QBs this year and trot out Cassel as if he was going to lead us anywhere. The fans will still fill the stadium in their red and gold and cheer on the team to win each and every week. They will be content with little victories even if it costs us in the long run (see the reaction of some after the Indy, Minn, Chi etc wins). They will hope for the playoffs even when our QB is incapable of winning any games, and the cycle will continue ad naseum year after year. That is the way it always has been, and sadly probably will be for the forseeable future.

That's why I'm scared to death of drafting Richardson.

Not only would your scenario hold true for next year but for the year after, and the year after, and the year after, and so on.

**The Bad Guy** · 01-12-2012, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

9-7?

Yeah, that's right. I thought they were 8-8.

Regardless the point still stands.

jd1020 · 01-12-2012, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Yeah, that's right. I thought they were 8-8.

Regardless the point still stands.

Not really. The point was he hadn't beaten a winning team. He has. Then it was he hasn't beaten a playoff team. He has. If the point were he's a bottom of the barrel shit starting NFL QB then the point would still stand.

**The Bad Guy** · 01-12-2012, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

Not really. The point was he hadn't beaten a winning team. He has. Then it was he hasn't beaten a playoff team. He has. If the point were he's a bottom of the barrel shit starting NFL QB then the point would still stand.

More semantics.

Yes, he's beaten one 9-7 team that didn't make the playoffs, and another 7-9 team that did.

Happy now?

He hasn't had a quality win against a quality opponent in 3 years here.

jd1020 · 01-12-2012, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Happy now?

Since he's likely to be the starting QB in 2012 with minimal competition... No.

Chief Roundup · 01-12-2012, 09:49 AM

In the 2cd segment he said Matt was a good QB. He went on to say that a QB has to be a least good to win a SB. Said that there have been good and great QB's that have won SB's. But that you have to have at least a good QB. Seems like he thinks Matt is at the bottum end of QB's that could win a SB to me.

Chief Roundup · 01-12-2012, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda

It won't happen and the front office knows it won't. They will pass on stud QBs this year and trot out Cassel as if he was going to lead us anywhere. The fans will still fill the stadium in their red and gold and cheer on the team to win each and every week. They will be content with little victories even if it costs us in the long run (see the reaction of some after the Indy, Minn, Chi etc wins). They will hope for the playoffs even when our QB is incapable of winning any games, and the cycle will continue ad naseum year after year. That is the way it always has been, and sadly probably will be for the forseeable future.

So you think that RG3 will fall to 11/12 pick? Do you think we would pass on him if he is there?
That is the only way we would pass on a "stud" QB this season.

**Easy 6** · 01-12-2012, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda

It won't happen and the front office knows it won't. They will pass on stud QBs this year and trot out Cassel as if he was going to lead us anywhere. The fans will still fill the stadium in their red and gold and cheer on the team to win each and every week. They will be content with little victories even if it costs us in the long run (see the reaction of some after the Indy, Minn, Chi etc wins). They will hope for the playoffs even when our QB is incapable of winning any games, and the cycle will continue ad naseum year after year. That is the way it always has been, and sadly probably will be for the forseeable future.

My gut believes this to be true, my heart refuses to even consider it.

ChiefsCountry · 01-12-2012, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

More semantics.

Yes, he's beaten one 9-7 team that didn't make the playoffs, and another 7-9 team that did.

Happy now?

He hasn't had a quality win against a quality opponent in 3 years here.

Here is the list of winning and playoff teams Cassel has beaten since 2008:

Miami in 2008 (Complete fraud team 11-5)
Arizona in 2008 (They did go to the Super Bowl but 9-7)
Pittsburgh in 2009 (Didn't make the playoffs 9-7)
Seattle in 2010 (7-9 NFC West Champs)

Yet Pioli thinks this is the guy to take us to the promise land.

01-11-2012, 12:06 PM
ShowtimeSBMVP Chiefs Join Date: Feb 2009 Casino cash: $3696009	Scott Pioli on Bob Fescoe and with Jack harry http://www.610sports.com/topic/play_...udioId=5634051 Man loves Cassel he will be the QB in 2012. Pioli thinks cassel is good I'm sure that is a fireable offense Hunt. Last edited by ShowtimeSBMVP; 01-11-2012 at 06:33 PM..
Posts: 23,752

01-12-2012, 09:18 AM	#196
Chief Roundup Admitted Planet Junky Join Date: Oct 2000 Casino cash: $2111627	Watching and listening to the Jack Harry Interview. I noticed in the first segment that Pioli said he is a strong believer in letting a HC name and put together his own staff. __________________ Fanaticism is nowhere. There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism.
Posts: 19,195

01-12-2012, 09:30 AM	#199
Agent V Bring me Geno. Join Date: Sep 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	How do we go about protesting this?
Posts: 1,938

01-12-2012, 09:49 AM	#205
Chief Roundup Admitted Planet Junky Join Date: Oct 2000 Casino cash: $2111627	In the 2cd segment he said Matt was a good QB. He went on to say that a QB has to be a least good to win a SB. Said that there have been good and great QB's that have won SB's. But that you have to have at least a good QB. Seems like he thinks Matt is at the bottum end of QB's that could win a SB to me. __________________ Fanaticism is nowhere. There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism.
Posts: 19,195