ChiefsPlanet Should Hootie be able to bribe his way off permaban?

**AustinChief** · 02:57 PM

Ok, just to be clear, this is a non binding poll. I'm just curious to find out what you guys feel on this.

Hootie wants to come back and offered to pay $150 to the server fund + $10/month AND will behave himself.

Any final decision on this is up to the mods... they have to deal with the messes so it's their call.

Like Hootie said to the passed out girl... "Pole is coming up"

**Saul Good** · 10-31-2013, 02:37 PM

**Saul Good** · 10-31-2013, 02:37 PM

He's going to lose this in a landslide, btw.

BlackHelicopters · 10-31-2013, 02:38 PM

Nightfyre · 10-31-2013, 02:39 PM

That's some pretty serious collateral. So long as you reserve the right to ban him if he gets out of line again and the cash is non-refundable. It is him putting his "money-where-his-mouth-is" about his behavior. I am in favor.

KCUnited · 10-31-2013, 02:56 PM

I don't care either way, but taking his money as a condition of his return makes things much more complicated, imo.

**AustinChief** · 10-31-2013, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCUnited

I don't care either way, but taking his money as a condition of his return makes things much more complicated, imo.

Just to be clear, these are HIS conditions not ones we came up with in any way.

vailpass · 11-01-2013, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre

That's some pretty serious collateral. So long as you reserve the right to ban him if he gets out of line again and the cash is non-refundable. It is him putting his "money-where-his-mouth-is" about his behavior. I am in favor.

X2
No immunity from future bans from any mod.

listopencil · 10-31-2013, 02:40 PM

Only if the community is given the option to create a banning fund that he has to beat in order to continue to post. Say each month there are contributions made to a Pay Pal account that go towards server costs. If he comes up with more by the end of the month, then he is allowed to post during the next month. This continues in perpetuity.

**RealSNR** · 10-31-2013, 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil

Only if the community is given the option to create a banning fund that he has to beat in order to continue to post. Say each month there are contributions made to a Pay Pal account that go towards server costs. If he comes up with more by the end of the month, then he is allowed to post during the next month. This continues in perpetuity.

Have you ever played the board game Illuminati?

Reminds me a lot of that.

**AustinChief** · 10-31-2013, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by listopencil

Only if the community is given the option to create a banning fund that he has to beat in order to continue to post. Say each month there are contributions made to a Pay Pal account that go towards server costs. If he comes up with more by the end of the month, then he is allowed to post during the next month. This continues in perpetuity.

haha now that's just mean. Guy would need to take on extra work and sell blood just to keep up.

**Saul Good** · 10-31-2013, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief

haha now that's just mean. Guy would need to take on extra work and sell blood just to keep up.

As long as nobody asks where he got the blood, he should be fine.

listopencil · 10-31-2013, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief

haha now that's just mean. Guy would need to take on extra work and sell blood just to keep up.

I was just going to vote "no" but this gives him a chance to log on now and then. You could set up a Pay Pal account for those willing to help him as well. Servers don't pay for themselves.

**HemiEd** · 10-31-2013, 02:55 PM

I don't really care one way or another. He never got under my skin or irritated me in any way. The fact that so many people do care, would indicate that he is significant to this board.

Now those 49er bots, are starting to concern me as to the ignore list capacity.

-King- · 10-31-2013, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

I like Hootie, and I know he's going to lose in a landslide anyway.

I said yes.

This.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace

I said "yes," but it's not because I think people should be able to buy back in; it's because I still disagree with him being banned.

And THIS.

View Poll Results: Allow Hootie to buy back in?
Yes I strongly agree	104	35.62%
I either don't have an opinion or it isn't a strong one on this matter	60	20.55%
No I strongly disagree	102	34.93%
We should force Fraz and KcNative to discuss and come to agreement on Hootie's fate just to have something they both agree on.	26	8.90%
Voters: 292. You may not vote on this poll

10-31-2013, 02:36 PM	Topic Starter
AustinChief Administrator Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Austin Casino cash: $2759112	Should Hootie be able to bribe his way off permaban? Ok, just to be clear, this is a non binding poll. I'm just curious to find out what you guys feel on this. Hootie wants to come back and offered to pay $150 to the server fund + $10/month AND will behave himself. Any final decision on this is up to the mods... they have to deal with the messes so it's their call. Like Hootie said to the passed out girl... "Pole is coming up" Last edited by AustinChief; 10-31-2013 at 02:57 PM..
Posts: 19,488

10-31-2013, 02:37 PM	#2
Saul Good Quit your bullshit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bored of winning Casino cash: $10052799	Yes __________________ Today is not a good day to be a pussy.
Posts: 41,870

10-31-2013, 02:37 PM	#3
Saul Good Quit your bullshit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bored of winning Casino cash: $10052799	He's going to lose this in a landslide, btw. __________________ Today is not a good day to be a pussy.
Posts: 41,870

10-31-2013, 02:38 PM	#4
BlackHelicopters Spiraling down the Drain Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Dante's Ninth Circle Casino cash: $2800588	In __________________ "We're both part of the same hypocrisy, Senator, but never think it applies to my family." "Fredo. You are my brother, and I love you. But never take sides against the Family again. Ever." 2019 Adopt a Chief - Travis Kelce #87
Posts: 31,651

10-31-2013, 02:39 PM	#5
Nightfyre MVP Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Helena, MT Casino cash: $3728849	That's some pretty serious collateral. So long as you reserve the right to ban him if he gets out of line again and the cash is non-refundable. It is him putting his "money-where-his-mouth-is" about his behavior. I am in favor.
Posts: 18,519

10-31-2013, 02:56 PM	#6
KCUnited Cheat Death Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Land of Drincoln Casino cash: $2378244	I don't care either way, but taking his money as a condition of his return makes things much more complicated, imo.
Posts: 33,870

10-31-2013, 02:40 PM	#9
listopencil Immanentize The Eschaton Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: In Partibus Infidelium Casino cash: $2315880	Only if the community is given the option to create a banning fund that he has to beat in order to continue to post. Say each month there are contributions made to a Pay Pal account that go towards server costs. If he comes up with more by the end of the month, then he is allowed to post during the next month. This continues in perpetuity. __________________ Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has...it has stolen.
Posts: 55,889

10-31-2013, 02:55 PM	#14
HemiEd Supporter Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Ozarks Casino cash: $3370564	I don't really care one way or another. He never got under my skin or irritated me in any way. The fact that so many people do care, would indicate that he is significant to this board. Now those 49er bots, are starting to concern me as to the ignore list capacity.
Posts: 33,394