|
10-04-2006, 02:56 PM | #2 |
The Wait Is Over
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Random Small Town
Casino cash: $2048978
|
That's a tought call. Trading Maroney leaves you a little thin at RB but Holt is a top WR.
I would do it though. It gives you a legit #1 WR for a RB that splits time. |
Posts: 6,191
|
10-04-2006, 03:00 PM | #3 |
Now you've pissed me off!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Casino cash: $8009572
|
You gotta take that deal.
__________________
"When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”--Abraham Lincoln |
Posts: 74,825
|
10-04-2006, 03:01 PM | #4 |
u b illian
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: DooDah
Casino cash: $10009436
|
Offer him Caddy instead. If he don't bite, you gotta take that deal.
|
Posts: 7,287
|
10-04-2006, 03:09 PM | #5 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Jersey
Casino cash: $5495958
|
I wouldn't do it. Holt has more value than Maroney, but you don't have a starting rb except Portis if you trade him. If Brown, Caddy, or Benson don't start producing, you will be screwed.
|
Posts: 9,209
|
10-04-2006, 03:09 PM | #6 |
Rufus Dawes Jr.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $1688179
|
Yeah, I've enjoyed playing Maroney as my flex.
|
Posts: 17,343
|
10-04-2006, 03:33 PM | #7 |
The 23rd Pillar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Casino cash: $10019237
|
I'd take it.
|
Posts: 110,871
|
|
|