Chiefs Mike and Mike Talking about Geno going #1 overall - Page 5

Hoover · 03-15-2013, 07:48 AM

It was just a matter of time. Obviously the Chiefs don't need him

but they are helping create a market for a trade.

Apparently Jaws loves the kid.

**DaKCMan AP** · 03-15-2013, 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

The Redskins put 3 1st round picks and a 2nd round pick.....and then went out and invested a 4th round pick into his ****ing backup. And that was even though Grossman coukd have been a capable backup QB.

We'd be investing a 1st and a 2nd into one of the WORST QB situations in the league.

/K.O.

**ptlyon** · 03-15-2013, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth

Isn't that how superbowl teams are built?

Not in Kansas City

**DaKCMan AP** · 03-15-2013, 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chief Henry

I would also take this years 1st and 2nd and next years
2nd.

No. Minimum of 2-1st's and a 2nd.

philfree · 03-15-2013, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

I wouldn't take less than 2013 #1, 2013 #2, and 2014 #1 with the possibility of us throwing back a 2013 6th or 7th.

Seems like there's alot of interest so hopefully this will end up in a bidding war. And if Geno goes #1 the #2 QB won't be far behind so maybe we can trade down twice. Then we'll be in the right spot to draft Tavon Austin and a developemental QB. Manuel or Bray. Bray tutoring behind Alex Smith for a couple years

**The Franchise** · 03-15-2013, 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suds79

Pestilence, don't get me wrong. I love the idea. I'm on board.

But I think you're setting yourself up for one bigtime letdown when this plan doesn't happen.

I mean surely you'd agree that the odds of this actually happening are miniscule at best right?

Ive already stated that there is a 1% chance of this happening.

**DaKCMan AP** · 03-15-2013, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree

Seems like there's alot of interest so hopefully this will end up in a bidding war. And if Geno goes #1 the #2 QB won't be far behind so maybe we can trade down twice. Then we'll be in the right spot to draft Tavon Austin and a developemental QB. Manuel or Bray. Bray tutoring behind Alex Smith for a couple years

I veto this plan.

Molitoth · 03-15-2013, 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptlyon

Not in Kansas City

Sorry, I was being very sarcastic.

Ace Gunner · 03-15-2013, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

What have we committed to Smith? A 2nd round pick? Who gives a ****.

but you don't understand / 8yo

philfree · 03-15-2013, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

I veto this plan.

I know you're against EJ. I'm not really hot on the guy either but I could see Reid thinking he could develope him. Of course we'll have the picks next year so we'll have a shot a QB then too.

**ptlyon** · 03-15-2013, 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molitoth

Sorry, I was being very sarcastic.

Just backing you up

**DaKCMan AP** · 03-15-2013, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree

I know you're against EJ. I'm not really hot on the guy either but I could see Reid thinking he could develope him. Of course we'll have the picks next year so we'll have a shot a QB then too.

To me, drafting EJ - especially when we don't have a #2 - is a complete waste. Unless we acquire more picks we need to get contributors out of rds 3-6.

DJ's left nut · 03-15-2013, 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

The Redskins put 3 1st round picks and a 2nd round pick.....and then went out and invested a 4th round pick into his ****ing backup. And that was even though Grossman coukd have been a capable backup QB.

We'd be investing a 1st and a 2nd into one of the WORST QB situations in the league.

However, there's another way to look at it.

If the Bills come calling with a 1 and 2 this year, plus a 1 and 3 next year, look at what you've invested into the position now.

The 2 firsts, 2 2nds and a 3rd.

Now that's not exorbitant...but it's sure as hell a lot.

I'm not arguing that they should take Joekel over Smith, as you well know. I do think, however, that if a bidding war emerges, you have to think really really hard about the opportunity cost and what your true investment in Geno becomes at that point.

patteeu · 03-15-2013, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefshrink

The 'pimping of Geno' has finally begun as expected and it will only get bigger these next 6 weeks which only favors the Chiefs. The Chiefs either select him to develop into our QBOTF or select him and trade or trade out with some team that doesn't trust the Jags NOT to take him. Hell, maybe the Jags don't trust those teams behind them NOT to swap out with the Chiefs and will swap with the Chiefs and the Chiefs recoup their 2nd IF they don't want Geno

This is good

I agree. I don't care which of those scenarios play out, they're all good. If the Chiefs believe in Geno, they'll take him. If they don't, it's great that other teams do.

HC_Chief · 03-15-2013, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu

I agree. I don't care which of those scenarios play out, they're all good. If the Chiefs believe in Geno, they'll take him. If they don't, it's great that other teams do.

I would love to see the Jax swap scenario come to fruition!

**Dave Lane** · 03-15-2013, 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree

I know you're against EJ. I'm not really hot on the guy either but I could see Reid thinking he could develope him. Of course we'll have the picks next year so we'll have a shot a QB then too.

Yeah there's always next year. Idiots.

03-15-2013, 07:48 AM
Hoover Rufus Dawes Jr. Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $1688179	Mike and Mike Talking about Geno going #1 overall It was just a matter of time. Obviously the Chiefs don't need him but they are helping create a market for a trade. Apparently Jaws loves the kid.
Posts: 17,343