***Official Draft Tyler Wilson Thread****

[Mr_Tomahawk]

...might as well get this started early.

Perhaps his injury well allow him to slip to the middle of the of the 1st round,..where we tend to draft.

[ChiefsCountry]

Originally Posted by O.city

NFL Philosophy ‏@NFLosophy

NFL Execs love fans because they make the machine work. But there's a reason why they are where they are and we are where we are.

They knew somebody to get in that field. Coming from somebody who worked in that field, that's how you get into those positions.

[KCrockaholic]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

They knew somebody to get in that field. Coming from somebody who worked in that field, that's how you get into those positions.

For 99% of those guys this is true.

[the Talking Can]

golf pros can become nfl coaches....

let's see a golf pro work his way into a nuclear research lab....you yam quaffing douche

[KCrockaholic]

That argument goes along the same lines of you shouldn't judge a quarterback because you aren't in his shoes, or you aren't an NFL quarterback.

Lame.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by Sorter

This is blackbob level stupidity.

I like hisuse of we and they in that tweet.

He is the same as us...not working in the NFL.
Posted via Mobile Device

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

I love that show they did.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by O.city

NFL Philosophy ‏@NFLosophy

So when something doesn't add up...maybe it's because you're missing part of the equation. Not because your team is dumb.

Or the team is just... You know.... Dumb.


We had scooter for long enough, and I trusted.


**** that. I had a girlfriend cheat once. This feels the same.


**** trust
Posted via Mobile Device

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

People don't seem to understand what BPA means or they just simply don't want to.

BPA = Best Player Available



Maybe BPA means TO THE CHIEFS what so many want it to mean and they are right. Maybe it includes "needs." However, maybe it does not? The term is pretty self explanitory in my opinion.

Furthermore, Dorsey gave a pretty good idea of what BPA means to him in this interview.

http://www.kcchiefs.com/media-center...8-bbaa4d113d7b

He talked about taking Cobb despite having Jennings, Jones, Nelson, Driver, and Finley in Green Bay. Now, is it different in the top 5? Yeah maybe but, that's not what he said.

What's my point?

None one of us has any clue what in the **** BPA means to the Chiefs. I would take it as stated and go from there. Anyone who claims BPA has one definition for all 32 teams is a god damnned idot.

Who knows what the new staff thinks about our talent? We have some major ****ing holes and are picking 1st in the draft for a reason. WE WERE THE WORST TEAM.

Stop talking about it. It's ****ing lame.

That seems like a really logical strategy. To just rank players with zero respect to team need and system and take a guy no matter the circumstances. The Packers really lucked out with that strategy when they picked up all those defensive players in last year's draft at a time when they needed all that new young defensive personnel.

FFS

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Just like when Sac said "Geno Smith, as a pocket passer, is a better prospect than RG3 right now".

Look what RunKC has in his ****ing sig.

It cuts both ways.

Yo RunKC where u at dawg

[Rambozo]

I'm watching the South Team's Tuesday practice for a second time this afternoon and taking notes. I'll try and post them tomorrow. Mayock and co. said several interesting things I thought were worth talking about.

He read some of his notes on Geno from the Oklahoma Game. Here are the highlights.

1. Eradic accuracy
2. Big time ability
3. Stares down too many receivers
4. Late on too many balls
5. Natural thrower
6. Beautiful delivery
7. Quick release
8. Can make evry throw
9. Poor eye discipline
10. On both interceptions he stared down the receiver, was late on the pass, and had poor eye discipline.

He was using these notes as to why he felt Geno should be there. He said he has a high level of talent but is way to inconsistant.

Mayock, Burmeister, and Davis all agreed there was no QB in this draft with a first round grade. Mayock said he thought at least three QBs would go in the first with the way people reach on them nowadays.

Daniel Jeremiah, former 8 year scout was also there. He scouted for the Ravens. He said he thought Geno was the only QB who would go in the first round. He thought it would be in the second half of the first and he was the only one he could say that about. He said the QBs were a roller coaster ride when you watch the tape. They are all inconsistant.

Last, Mayock said he had talked to several scouts who confirmed teams were not watching the 2012 film of Tyler Wilson becausee Arkansas was such a mess. They will not hold last year against Wilson

Anyway, I highlighted the bold parts because I shared these opinions and have been killed for them for a while now. It was nice to hear I'm not the only one who sees those things.

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by SNR

Yo RunKC where u at dawg

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by Rambozo

I'm watching the South Team's Tuesday practice for a second time this afternoon and taking notes. I'll try and post them tomorrow. Mayock and co. said several interesting things I thought were worth talking about.

He read some of his notes on Geno from the Oklahoma Game. Here are the highlights.

1. Eradic accuracy
2. Big time ability
3. Stares down too many receivers
4. Late on too many balls
5. Natural thrower
6. Beautiful delivery
7. Quick release
8. Can make evry throw
9. Poor eye discipline
10. On both interceptions he stared down the receiver, was late on the pass, and had poor eye discipline.

He was using these notes as to why he felt Geno should be there. He said he has a high level of talent but is way to inconsistant.

Mayock, Burmeister, and Davis all agreed there was no QB in this draft with a first round grade. Mayock said he thought at least three QBs would go in the first with the way people reach on them nowadays.

Daniel Jeremiah, former 8 year scout was also there. He scouted for the Ravens. He said he thought Geno was the only QB who would go in the first round. He thought it would be in the second half of the first and he was the only one he could say that about. He said the QBs were a roller coaster ride when you watch the tape. They are all inconsistant.

Last, Mayock said he had talked to several scouts who confirmed teams were not watching the 2012 film of Tyler Wilson becausee Arkansas was such a mess. They will not hold last year against Wilson

Anyway, I highlighted the bold parts because I shared these opinions. It was nice to hear I'm not the only one who sees those things.

JFC.

[Rambozo]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

They knew somebody to get in that field. Coming from somebody who worked in that field, that's how you get into those positions.

You HAD to know someone if you worked in that field. j/k

[B14ckmon]

To whomever was asking about fumbles;

I have no idea how accurate this is because it seems crazy high to me.

Glennon: 13
Geno: 8

Wilson isn't listed because it skips from 5 to 0 to shorten the list so he would fall between 1 and 4. I believe I heard he had 2 fumbles on the season.

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

To whomever was asking about fumbles;

I have no idea how accurate this is because it seems crazy high to me.

Glennon: 13
Geno: 8

Wilson isn't listed because it skips from 5 to 0 to shorten the list so he would fall between 1 and 4. I believe I heard he had 2 fumbles on the season.

I don't think that is fumbles lost. That number seems right considering their OLs