Chiefs What's the least you'd settle for in order to trade down?

Direckshun · 03-19-2013, 11:10 AM

I don't think the #1 pick can be traded. A lot of you disagree with me.

Let's test out what you'd even be willing to accept.

Poll forthcoming.

Bewbies · 03-19-2013, 11:11 AM

A #1 next year would be a must.

B14ckmon · 03-19-2013, 11:13 AM

2nd rounder next year and 4th rounder this year from the Jaguars. It's only one spot and hey can pick anyone they want that isn't Geno.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-19-2013, 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B14ckmon

2nd rounder next year and 4th rounder this year from the Jaguars. It's only one spot and hey can pick anyone they want that isn't Geno.

I'd go 2nd round next year and a third this year from Jacksonville.

Other than that, it depends on the team. If it were Buffalo, their first and second in 2013 and a first in 2014.

B14ckmon · 03-19-2013, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

I'd go 2nd round next year and a third this year from Jacksonville.

Other than that, it depends on the team. If it were Buffalo, their first and second in 2013 and a first in 2014.

Depending on what the Jaguars think they can get for their #33 pick, I could see that. They could potentially trade it for 2 later 2nd round picks or a 2nd and a 3rd.

Fritz88 · 03-19-2013, 11:38 AM

So far, Dorsey has been getting raped in FA. Yes, he did make some nice moves, but..

He could have probably used Glenn Dorsey in the Alex trade.

He could have used Cassel earlier in a trade instead of holding on to him for so long.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him get blown in a trade down, if it happens..

**The Franchise** · 03-19-2013, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88

So far, Dorsey has been getting raped in FA. Yes, he did make some nice moves, but..

He could have probably used Glenn Dorsey in the Alex trade.

He could have used Cassel earlier in a trade instead of holding on to him for so long.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him get blown in a trade down, if it happens..

Glenn Dorsey was not under contract. Therefore....we couldn't trade him.

Fritz88 · 03-19-2013, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Glenn Dorsey was not under contract. Therefore....we couldn't trade him.

Okay, my bad. I thought we could have traded him.

saphojunkie · 03-19-2013, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88

So far, Dorsey has been getting raped in FA. Yes, he did make some nice moves, but..

He could have probably used Glenn Dorsey in the Alex trade.

He could have used Cassel earlier in a trade instead of holding on to him for so long.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him get blown in a trade down, if it happens..

A) No, he hasn't.
B) No, he couldn't have. Dorsey was a free agent and they would have had to re-sign him in order to trade him, and then San Francisco would have just offered Dorsey more money. This is reeruned.
3) WTF are you even talking about now.
4) ANYTHING WE GET FOR TRADING DOWN IS GOOD. THE ONLY UNACCEPTABLE EVENT IS STAYING AT 1.1 AND TAKING A NON-QB.

Fritz88 · 03-19-2013, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie

A) No, he hasn't.
B) No, he couldn't have. Dorsey was a free agent and they would have had to re-sign him in order to trade him, and then San Francisco would have just offered Dorsey more money. This is reeruned.
3) WTF are you even talking about now.
4) ANYTHING WE GET FOR TRADING DOWN IS GOOD. THE ONLY UNACCEPTABLE EVENT IS STAYING AT 1.1 AND TAKING A NON-QB.

You really think holding on to Cassel and not shopping him early was smart?

It was obvious he would be released after we signed Smith.
Posted via Mobile Device

Deberg_1990 · 03-19-2013, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88

So far, Dorsey has been getting raped in FA. Yes, he did make some nice moves, but..

He could have probably used Glenn Dorsey in the Alex trade.

He could have used Cassel earlier in a trade instead of holding on to him for so long.

I wouldn't be surprised to see him get blown in a trade down, if it happens..

**The Franchise** · 03-19-2013, 11:13 AM

It's all going to depend on what team it is and how far we'd be dropping.

Anything in the 4-8 range? I want their 1st and 2nd this year and at least a 2nd round pick in 2014.

Anything below that and I want a 1st next year instead of a 2nd.

**Old Dog** · 03-19-2013, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

It's all going to depend on what team it is and how far we'd be dropping.

Ding, Ding, Ding........winner

**The Franchise** · 03-19-2013, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Except it's bogus.

There's a big difference between a team that's wanting to jump from the 20's to the #1 spot and a team in the Top Five that wants to jump to the #1 spot.

See below.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

It's all going to depend on what team it is and how far we'd be dropping.

Anything in the 4-8 range? I want their 1st and 2nd this year and at least a 2nd round pick in 2014.

Anything below that and I want a 1st next year instead of a 2nd.

Ace Gunner · 03-19-2013, 11:15 AM

it won't happen. there is no team gonna trade up folks.

View Poll Results: Chiefs give up #1 pick. In addition to the other team's 1st, the Chiefs get:
a 2nd this year, and their 1st and 2nd next year, plus extra picks.	9	10.98%
a 2nd this year, and their 1st and 2nd next year.	17	20.73%
a 2nd this year, and their 1st next year.	30	36.59%
a 2nd this year, and their 2nd next year.	10	12.20%
a 2nd and a third this year.	4	4.88%
a 2nd this year, and their 3rd next year.	4	4.88%
a 2nd and a midrounder this year.	1	1.22%
a 2nd this year, and a midrounder next year.	2	2.44%
a 2nd this year.	6	7.32%
a 1st next year.	5	6.10%
a 3rd this year, and a 1st next year.	3	3.66%
a 3rd this year, and a 2nd next year.	1	1.22%
a 3rd this year, and a 2nd next year.	0	0%
a 3rd this year, and a 3rd next year.	0	0%
a 3rd and a midrounder this year.	0	0%
a 3rd this year.	0	0%
even less than a 3rd this year.	0	0%
Other (please explain).	4	4.88%
Direckshun's whore of a mother and eight baseball bats.	11	13.41%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll

03-19-2013, 11:10 AM	Topic Starter
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $4413447	What's the least you'd settle for in order to trade down? I don't think the #1 pick can be traded. A lot of you disagree with me. Let's test out what you'd even be willing to accept. Poll forthcoming.
Posts: 59,258

03-19-2013, 11:11 AM	#2
Bewbies Ith Fuhtbawl Time Join Date: Apr 2010 Casino cash: $9999900	A #1 next year would be a must.
Posts: 10,085

03-19-2013, 11:13 AM	#3
B14ckmon Jagwire Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Cedar Rapids, IA Casino cash: $10004900	2nd rounder next year and 4th rounder this year from the Jaguars. It's only one spot and hey can pick anyone they want that isn't Geno. __________________ Luke Joeckel - Chiefs LT of the Future!
Posts: 2,316

03-19-2013, 11:38 AM	#6
Fritz88 Custom User Title Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $8875943	So far, Dorsey has been getting raped in FA. Yes, he did make some nice moves, but.. He could have probably used Glenn Dorsey in the Alex trade. He could have used Cassel earlier in a trade instead of holding on to him for so long. I wouldn't be surprised to see him get blown in a trade down, if it happens..
Posts: 12,706

03-19-2013, 11:13 AM	#12
The Franchise Most Valuable Villain Join Date: Dec 2006 Casino cash: $3145047	It's all going to depend on what team it is and how far we'd be dropping. Anything in the 4-8 range? I want their 1st and 2nd this year and at least a 2nd round pick in 2014. Anything below that and I want a 1st next year instead of a 2nd.
Posts: 91,989

03-19-2013, 11:15 AM	#15
Ace Gunner First Overall Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: kcmo Casino cash: $10007271	it won't happen. there is no team gonna trade up folks. __________________ The Greatest
Posts: 10,580