Obama USS Obama going down, Libya emails to Obama's administration. - Page 26

ROYC75 · 10-23-2012, 08:19 PM

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...roup-on-radar/

State Department emails from day of Libya attack show Al Qaeda-tied group on radar

By Chad Pergram

Published October 23, 2012

FoxNews.com

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...#ixzz2ABA6n3a7

A series of internal State Department emails obtained by Fox News shows some some of the initial assessments of last month's deadly consulate attack in Libya, including one email within hours of the attack that noted that the group Ansar al Sharia had claimed responsibility.

Ansar al Sharia has been declared by the State Department to be a an Al Qaeda-affiliated group. A member of the group suspected of participating in the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi has been arrested and is being held in Tunisia.

The emails obtained by Fox News were sent by the State Department to a variety of national security platforms, whose addresses have been redacted, including the White House Situation Room, the Pentagon, the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence.

Fox News was told that an estimated 300 to 400 national security figures received these emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out and concluding. People who received these emails work directly under the nation’s top national security, military and diplomatic officials, Fox News was told.

The timestamps on the emails are all Eastern Time and often include the subheading SBU…which is shorthand for “Sensitive But Unclassified.”

The first email indicates that U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and other personnel were “in the compound safe haven.” Officials later discovered that Stevens and three other Americans had died in the attack.

The first email was sent at 4:05 p.m. ET with the subject line “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU).”

“The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack," the email reads. "Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support.

"The operations Center will provide updates as available.”

The second email came at 4:54 p.m. ET, with a subject line “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi (SBU)"

“Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site attempting to locate COM personnel.”

The third email came at 6:07 p.m. ET and was sent to a different email list but still includes the White House Situation Room address and a subject line of “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU).”

“Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli," the email reads.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...#ixzz2AB9lsYce

Comrade Crapski · 10-27-2012, 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider

This crime runs much deeper than raising money. Much like his cheerleader Slick Willy who sent missiles that killed innocent victims to change the topic of the fact of him getting his dick sucked by a simpleton. He has pounded his chest claiming he has defeated those who oppose us. This organized attack did not fit that claim. He and those under his watch decided to let these people be murdered and tried to sell it as random outrage over a video released well before the attack. The left must do one of two things, own the fact this is unacceptable or ignore it and and spin this CRIME as no big deal. Which means one of two things. You are a worthless shitbag who votes down the line left or you are a person of honor who makes a stand saying this type of bullshit is not acceptable~

KChiefer

ROYC75 · 10-27-2012, 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Grand_Illusion

Yup, this former military caller had some great insight:

Yep, but don't try to explain protocol to the typical liberals and many D's.

Common sense is not within their wealth of wisdom & vocabulary.

**J Diddy** · 10-27-2012, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75

Yep, but don't try to explain protocol to the typical liberals and many D's.

Common sense is not within their wealth of wisdom & vocabulary.

Please talk to me about common sense. You were the one wishing to banish free speech for election purposes.

ROYC75 · 10-27-2012, 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy

Please talk to me about common sense. You were the one wishing to banish free speech for election purposes.

Oh, spoken like a true tongue twisting liberal politician. If you can't speak the truth, either lie about it or spin and twist it around t suit your own agenda.

Since when does a conversation become a face value ? A mere discussion becomes facts ? We know that all politicians are liars, but people can not have discussions about things of this world without being classified as an agenda ?

Wishing ? No. TBF here, I overlooked the free speech aspect of it untill Pat brought it up. After seeing it I then mentioned that it was the lone setback I could see that would hinder it and said I do not want to stop free speech but maybe a 3 day grace period could work. In as much, it never would, the people would be too upset over it as it goes against the constitution.

Discussions about topics ? Yes.

Your analysis ? Wrong.

**J Diddy** · 10-27-2012, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75

Oh, spoken like a true tongue twisting liberal politician. If you can't speak the truth, either lie about it or spin and twist it around t suit your own agenda.

Since when does a conversation become a face value ? A mere discussion becomes facts ? We know that all politicians are liars, but people can not have discussions about things of this world without being classified as an agenda ?

Wishing ? No. TBF here, I overlooked the free speech aspect of it untill Pat brought it up. After seeing it I then mentioned that it was the lone setback I could see that would hinder it and said I do not want to stop free speech but maybe a 3 day grace period could work. In as much, it never would, the people would be too upset over it as it goes against the constitution.

Discussions about topics ? Yes.

Your analysis ? Wrong.

Actually I brought it up first.

The fact that it needed to be brought up to you shows the depth of your thinking.

ROYC75 · 10-27-2012, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy

Actually I brought it up first.

The fact that it needed to be brought up to you shows the depth of your thinking.

You did ?

I recall myself talking about it and Patt telling me basically to re-think it.

In other words, you did lie, twist and spin it !

**J Diddy** · 10-27-2012, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROYC75

You did ?

I recall myself talking about it and Patt telling me basically to re-think it.

In other words, you did lie, twist and spin it !

we posted at the same time, mine was quicker.

I'm the Josey wales of typing

MTG#10 · 10-27-2012, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo

This is damning news for The President. Reuters isn't exactly Conservative. This is going to blowup tomorrow and be huge.

Wasn't as huge as it should have been. What gives?

10-23-2012, 08:19 PM
ROYC75 Time For Your Wake Up Call !!! Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Barn Yard Casino cash: $28526	USS Obama going down, Libya emails to Obama's administration. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...roup-on-radar/ State Department emails from day of Libya attack show Al Qaeda-tied group on radar By Chad Pergram Published October 23, 2012 FoxNews.com Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...#ixzz2ABA6n3a7 A series of internal State Department emails obtained by Fox News shows some some of the initial assessments of last month's deadly consulate attack in Libya, including one email within hours of the attack that noted that the group Ansar al Sharia had claimed responsibility. Ansar al Sharia has been declared by the State Department to be a an Al Qaeda-affiliated group. A member of the group suspected of participating in the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi has been arrested and is being held in Tunisia. The emails obtained by Fox News were sent by the State Department to a variety of national security platforms, whose addresses have been redacted, including the White House Situation Room, the Pentagon, the FBI and the Director of National Intelligence. Fox News was told that an estimated 300 to 400 national security figures received these emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out and concluding. People who received these emails work directly under the nation’s top national security, military and diplomatic officials, Fox News was told. The timestamps on the emails are all Eastern Time and often include the subheading SBU…which is shorthand for “Sensitive But Unclassified.” The first email indicates that U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and other personnel were “in the compound safe haven.” Officials later discovered that Stevens and three other Americans had died in the attack. The first email was sent at 4:05 p.m. ET with the subject line “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU).” “The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack," the email reads. "Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support. "The operations Center will provide updates as available.” The second email came at 4:54 p.m. ET, with a subject line “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi (SBU)" “Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site attempting to locate COM personnel.” The third email came at 6:07 p.m. ET and was sent to a different email list but still includes the White House Situation Room address and a subject line of “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU).” “Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli," the email reads. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...#ixzz2AB9lsYce
Posts: 22,955

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode