Home Mail Chat Wallpapers
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > The Lounge > Washington DC and The Holy Land

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-12-2018, 12:50 PM  
HonestChieffan HonestChieffan is offline
Seeking the Truth daily
 
HonestChieffan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the Country in MO
Casino cash: $34409
The Kamala Harris Trial Ballons

Here goes another pass at selling this crazy to the lefty base




Top oddsmakers have Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) as the early favorite to win the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination.

According to a Wednesday evening report in the San Francisco Chronicle, on Oddshark, “Harris has surged into a tie with Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders for the best Democratic odds to win the 2020 presidential election.” The report also notes that Oddschecker, which compares betting odds across various sites and sportsbooks, gives Harris “9/2 odds to win the Democratic nomination, followed by Joe Biden with 11/2 odds.”

President Donald Trump, though, is still the favorite to win reelection, with Oddshark reportedly giving him +140 to win in 2020 while Oddschecker gives Trump 11/8 odds.

To win her party’s nomination, the freshman California Senator who recently said she would not rule out a 2020 run will need the support of black voters, especially in early primary states like South Carolina. Harris told the left-wing Netroots conference last week that when it comes to “identity politics,” Democrats “won’t be shut up” and be “silenced.”

“We shouldn’t just be thanking women of color for electing progressive leaders, in 2018 we should be electing women of color as those leaders,” Harris said at Netroots. “Now, I’m aware that some people will say that what I just said is playing ‘identity politics.’ I have a problem with that phrase, ‘identity politics.’ When people say that, it’s a pejorative. That phrase is used to divide and used to distract.”

Harris, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, will likely up her profile even more during the confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh
Posts: 43,320
HonestChieffan is obviously part of the inner Circle.HonestChieffan is obviously part of the inner Circle.HonestChieffan is obviously part of the inner Circle.HonestChieffan is obviously part of the inner Circle.HonestChieffan is obviously part of the inner Circle.HonestChieffan is obviously part of the inner Circle.HonestChieffan is obviously part of the inner Circle.HonestChieffan is obviously part of the inner Circle.HonestChieffan is obviously part of the inner Circle.HonestChieffan is obviously part of the inner Circle.HonestChieffan is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 09:15 PM   #16
Chiefshrink Chiefshrink is offline
Admit it KC...You love me now!
 
Chiefshrink's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: donkey land
Casino cash: $18001
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloucesterChief View Post
With the lunatic feminist fringe the Dems have, they are seriously thinking about running a woman who got her political start as Jerry Brown's mistress?
I get your point, but she very well could be the Palin for the Left and IF she can fake a little conservatism and throw it in from time to time(much like Barry did in 08) as she did by challenging the "identity politics" thing that isn't working I think she would do better than you think. Because Pelosi and Schumer are the definition of insanity and much of the Bernie side of the Left is recognizing this and wants change. And as far as her past affair with Brown, morality is relative in their(Dem) world and it doesn't matter especially if she is resonating.
__________________
"All real Americans love the sting of battle and may God have mercy on my enemies because I wont".

'Progressivism' is nothing more than a dressed up co-opted term for 'Marxism'.
Posts: 20,119
Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 09:21 PM   #17
BucEyedPea BucEyedPea is offline
BucsPatsNoles
 
BucEyedPea's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: None of your business
Casino cash: $70063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefshrink View Post
The Old Testament is the red carpet for Jesus.
Eye for an Eye

The attempted genocide of every single Canaanite or to “completely destroy” the Canaanites in order that they may have that land for themselves.

Versus:

Turning the other cheek
Blessed are the Peacemakers ( Sermon on the Mount)
and I am sure Christ wouldn't have called any woman a slut since he didn't call Mary Magdalene one.

Which one do you think GD sounds like more? I say Old Testament. Not making any statements about the Bible other than what Testament GD sounds like more.
__________________
Posts: 105,357
BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 09:38 PM   #18
Chiefshrink Chiefshrink is offline
Admit it KC...You love me now!
 
Chiefshrink's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: donkey land
Casino cash: $18001
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea View Post
Eye for an Eye

The attempted genocide of every single Canaanite or to “completely destroy” the Canaanites in order that they may have that land for themselves.

Versus:

Turning the other cheek
Blessed are the Peacemakers ( Sermon on the Mount)
and I am sure Christ wouldn't have called any woman a slut since he didn't call Mary Magdalene one.

Which one do you think GD sounds like more? I say Old Testament. Not making any statements about the Bible other than what Testament GD sounds like more.
No, I get what you are saying about your assumption of GD but many have this notion about both testaments being very different when they are not theologically different at all and must be told in truth.

At the very heart of this question lies a fundamental misunderstanding of what both the Old and New Testaments reveal about the nature of God. Another way of expressing this same basic thought is when people say, “The God of the Old Testament is a God of wrath while the God of the New Testament is a God of love.” The fact that the Bible is God’s progressive revelation of Himself to us through historical events and through His relationship with people throughout history might contribute to misconceptions about what God is like in the Old Testament as compared to the New Testament. However, when one reads both the Old and the New Testaments, it becomes evident that God is not different from one testament to another and that God’s wrath and His love are revealed in both testaments.

For example, throughout the Old Testament, God is declared to be a “compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness,” (Exodus 34:6; Numbers 14:18; Deuteronomy 4:31; Nehemiah 9:17; Psalm 86:5, 15; 108:4; 145:8; Joel 2:13). Yet in the New Testament, God’s loving-kindness and mercy are manifested even more fully through the fact that “God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16). Throughout the Old Testament, we also see God dealing with Israel the same way a loving father deals with a child. When they willfully sinned against Him and began to worship idols, God would punish them. Yet, each time He would deliver them once they had repented of their idolatry. This is much the same way God deals with Christians in the New Testament. For example, Hebrews 12:6 tells us that “the Lord disciplines those he loves, and he punishes everyone he accepts as a son.”

In a similar way, throughout the Old Testament we see God’s judgment and wrath poured out on sin. Likewise, in the New Testament we see that the wrath of God is still “being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness” (Romans 1:18). So, clearly, God is no different in the Old Testament than He is in the New Testament. God by His very nature is immutable (unchanging). While we might see one aspect of His nature revealed in certain passages of Scripture more than other aspects, God Himself does not change.

As we read and study the Bible, it becomes clear that God is the same in the Old and New Testaments. Even though the Bible is 66 individual books written on two (or possibly three) continents, in three different languages, over a period of approximately 1500 years by more than 40 authors, it remains one unified book from beginning to end without contradiction. In it we see how a loving, merciful, and just God deals with sinful men in all kinds of situations. Truly, the Bible is God’s love letter to mankind. God’s love for His creation, especially for mankind, is evident all through Scripture. Throughout the Bible we see God lovingly and mercifully calling people into a special relationship with Himself, not because they deserve it, but because He is a gracious and merciful God, slow to anger and abundant in loving-kindness and truth. Yet we also see a holy and righteous God who is the Judge of all those who disobey His Word and refuse to worship Him, turning instead to worship gods of their own creation (Romans chapter 1).

Because of God’s righteous and holy character, all sin—past, present, and future—must be judged. Yet God in His infinite love has provided a payment for sin and a way of reconciliation so that sinful man can escape His wrath. We see this wonderful truth in verses like 1 John 4:10: “This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins.” In the Old Testament, God provided a sacrificial system whereby atonement could be made for sin. However, this sacrificial system was only temporary and merely looked forward to the coming of Jesus Christ who would die on the cross to make a complete substitutionary atonement for sin. The Savior who was promised in the Old Testament is fully revealed in the New Testament. Only envisioned in the Old Testament, the ultimate expression of God’s love, the sending of His Son Jesus Christ, is revealed in all its glory in the New Testament. Both the Old and the New Testaments were given “to make us wise unto salvation” (2 Timothy 3:15). When we study the Testaments closely, it is evident that God “does not change like shifting shadows” (James 1:17).
__________________
"All real Americans love the sting of battle and may God have mercy on my enemies because I wont".

'Progressivism' is nothing more than a dressed up co-opted term for 'Marxism'.

Last edited by Chiefshrink; 08-12-2018 at 09:48 PM..
Posts: 20,119
Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 09:38 PM   #19
GloryDayz GloryDayz is offline
45, 46, 47....
 
GloryDayz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: FEMA-Free Zone
Casino cash: $85480
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea View Post
Eye for an Eye

The attempted genocide of every single Canaanite or to “completely destroy” the Canaanites in order that they may have that land for themselves.

Versus:

Turning the other cheek
Blessed are the Peacemakers ( Sermon on the Mount)
and I am sure Christ wouldn't have called any woman a slut since he didn't call Mary Magdalene one.

Which one do you think GD sounds like more? I say Old Testament. Not making any statements about the Bible other than what Testament GD sounds like more.
Sweetheart, when is the $20 rent due?
__________________
.
#F***EricBerry
#BEPdefendsLyingWhores
#FFFFFFFF
#ServeAtThePleasureOfThePresident
#WitchHunt
#ObamaEraSurvivor
#InTrumpWeTrust
#AbolishTheFBI
#MeToo
#HeToo
#Doorknobs
#BotsMan...BOTS
Posts: 71,996
GloryDayz is obviously part of the inner Circle.GloryDayz is obviously part of the inner Circle.GloryDayz is obviously part of the inner Circle.GloryDayz is obviously part of the inner Circle.GloryDayz is obviously part of the inner Circle.GloryDayz is obviously part of the inner Circle.GloryDayz is obviously part of the inner Circle.GloryDayz is obviously part of the inner Circle.GloryDayz is obviously part of the inner Circle.GloryDayz is obviously part of the inner Circle.GloryDayz is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 09:50 PM   #20
baitism baitism is offline
MVP
 
baitism's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Overland Park, KS
Casino cash: $19651
Dems have backed themselves into a corner. Only a left wing loon can win the dem primary and they will have no appeal to the vast majority of this country.
Posts: 9,294
baitism is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.baitism is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.baitism is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.baitism is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.baitism is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.baitism is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.baitism is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.baitism is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.baitism is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.baitism is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.baitism is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 10:06 PM   #21
GloucesterChief GloucesterChief is offline
MVP
 

Join Date: Jan 2013
Casino cash: $26554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiefshrink View Post
I get your point, but she very well could be the Palin for the Left and IF she can fake a little conservatism and throw it in from time to time(much like Barry did in 08) as she did by challenging the "identity politics" thing that isn't working I think she would do better than you think. Because Pelosi and Schumer are the definition of insanity and much of the Bernie side of the Left is recognizing this and wants change. And as far as her past affair with Brown, morality is relative in their(Dem) world and it doesn't matter especially if she is resonating.
Oh the getting your start by ****ing a politician is only just the beginning. Her term as DA of Cali was pretty bad as well.
Posts: 9,313
GloucesterChief threw an interception on a screen pass.GloucesterChief threw an interception on a screen pass.GloucesterChief threw an interception on a screen pass.GloucesterChief threw an interception on a screen pass.GloucesterChief threw an interception on a screen pass.GloucesterChief threw an interception on a screen pass.GloucesterChief threw an interception on a screen pass.GloucesterChief threw an interception on a screen pass.GloucesterChief threw an interception on a screen pass.GloucesterChief threw an interception on a screen pass.GloucesterChief threw an interception on a screen pass.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 10:07 PM   #22
Chiefshrink Chiefshrink is offline
Admit it KC...You love me now!
 
Chiefshrink's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: donkey land
Casino cash: $18001
Quote:
Originally Posted by baitism View Post
Dems have backed themselves into a corner. Only a left wing loon can win the dem primary and they will have no appeal to the vast majority of this country.
Praise Jesus !!! and I agree thoroughly!!

But like I said in an earlier post if they would just fake some conservatism they would at least do somewhat better but we all know that would piss off the head communists who run this party.
__________________
"All real Americans love the sting of battle and may God have mercy on my enemies because I wont".

'Progressivism' is nothing more than a dressed up co-opted term for 'Marxism'.
Posts: 20,119
Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 10:09 PM   #23
Chiefshrink Chiefshrink is offline
Admit it KC...You love me now!
 
Chiefshrink's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: donkey land
Casino cash: $18001
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloucesterChief View Post
Oh the getting your start by ****ing a politician is only just the beginning. Her term as DA of Cali was pretty bad as well.
Well you know more than I about this lady but you know as well as I do when it comes to politics of the Dem party it ain't about performance or morality but what resonates with them.
__________________
"All real Americans love the sting of battle and may God have mercy on my enemies because I wont".

'Progressivism' is nothing more than a dressed up co-opted term for 'Marxism'.
Posts: 20,119
Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.Chiefshrink is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2018, 10:38 PM   #24
Over Yonder Over Yonder is offline
Veteran
 
Over Yonder's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: North Missouri
Casino cash: $1500
Quote:
Originally Posted by baitism View Post
Dems have backed themselves into a corner. Only a left wing loon can win the dem primary and they will have no appeal to the vast majority of this country.
I wouldn't be so sure of that. The Dem message I am hearing is.....

"Everything should be free, Trump and the rich white people are the devil, and to reiterate, free shit for everyone!!!"

And I think Kamala can deliver that message. Heck, this country elected Obama..... TWICE!! Let's not forget the cancer that is eating away at America. It's still there.

...And if we can't convince Americans of this, we will just bring in some more foreigners. And not the kind that sing songs like Urgent.

Baitism, I hope you are right. But the writing on the wall that I am reading is screaming death to traditional America. Twice in this century the electoral college has bailed out the U.S. America is filling up with people that are more interested with self than country. Think about right here on this board how many people post stuff like "I can't believe people vote against their own self interest." I can think of 3 posters right off the top of my head that have said something similar to that.

The long game all plays right into the Dems corner. And the damn Repubs won't fight back, cause racist and stuff

Oh well, let's enjoy it while we can I guess
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prison Bitch View Post
Posts: 3,857
Over Yonder is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Over Yonder is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Over Yonder is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Over Yonder is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Over Yonder is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Over Yonder is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Over Yonder is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Over Yonder is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Over Yonder is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Over Yonder is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Over Yonder is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2018, 05:05 AM   #25
Hammock Parties Hammock Parties is offline
checkUP
 
Hammock Parties's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $577
discount bitch obama

you don't get to play the "identity politics labels are divisive and bigoted!!!" card when you are the one bringing up how great identity politics are

"vote for me! i'm a black woman and gosh we need one of those in the white house! it's possible i may become a lesbian too, if it will help my campaign!"
Posts: 201,178
Hammock Parties is obviously part of the inner Circle.Hammock Parties is obviously part of the inner Circle.Hammock Parties is obviously part of the inner Circle.Hammock Parties is obviously part of the inner Circle.Hammock Parties is obviously part of the inner Circle.Hammock Parties is obviously part of the inner Circle.Hammock Parties is obviously part of the inner Circle.Hammock Parties is obviously part of the inner Circle.Hammock Parties is obviously part of the inner Circle.Hammock Parties is obviously part of the inner Circle.Hammock Parties is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2018, 03:39 PM   #26
Calcountry Calcountry is offline
Shoot the tube
 
Calcountry's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2003
Casino cash: $6320
Quote:
Originally Posted by frozenchief View Post
I saw the headline Kamala Harris balloons. I’m very disappointed in this thread.
Funny, I was wondering what a BALLON was.
Posts: 27,069
Calcountry 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliCalcountry 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliCalcountry 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliCalcountry 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliCalcountry 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliCalcountry 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliCalcountry 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliCalcountry 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliCalcountry 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliCalcountry 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliCalcountry 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitelli
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 AM.


This is a test for a client's site.
Fort Worth Texas Process Servers
Covering Arlington, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie and surrounding communities.
Tarrant County, Texas and Johnson County, Texas.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.