|
|
View Poll Results: Would you have traded that #1 -3rd pick for Seymour ? | |||
Yes, knowing it was TJack or Seymour. I go Seymour. | 19 | 57.58% | |
No. I would have kept Tyson Jackson. | 5 | 15.15% | |
This poll is flawed and Gaz would cut off your fingers so you would stop typing. | 9 | 27.27% | |
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
11-09-2010, 04:08 PM | Topic Starter |
Most Valuable Poster
Join Date: Oct 2003
Casino cash: $9490002
|
With 2009 #1 pick, 3rd overall, do you trade for Richard Seymour or pick TJ?
Richard Seymour was a beast on Sunday.
As much as we trade with the Patriots... why didn't we have the ability to snag him first? He arguably won the game for the Raiders yesterday. I'm sure we could have got Cassel, Vrabel & Seymour for our 1st & 2nd and their 4th or something. Tyson Jackson sucks IMO. |
Posts: 36,649
|
11-09-2010, 04:11 PM | #2 |
The Beast Inside Your Head
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Parts Unknown
Casino cash: $2049122
|
Trading a 1st round pick for Seymour at this stage would have been about as smart as drafting Tyson Jackson.
|
Posts: 25,858
|
11-09-2010, 04:14 PM | #3 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Liberty, MO
Casino cash: $3974112
|
no, you dont trade a first for him
|
Posts: 14,976
|
11-10-2010, 12:05 AM | #4 |
MVP
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Petaluma, CA, USA
Casino cash: $9955920
|
|
Posts: 10,146
|
11-09-2010, 04:16 PM | #5 |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $1904088
|
Orakpo
|
Posts: 47,107
|
11-09-2010, 04:16 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Top City
Casino cash: $10004900
|
drafting TJ at #3 was dumb. Trading the #3 for an aging Seymour, also would have been dumb.
Sure, we would be much better off with Seymour, but you would never trade the #3. |
Posts: 1,543
|
11-09-2010, 04:19 PM | #7 |
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $2308919
|
Neither....
__________________
|
Posts: 47,478
|
11-09-2010, 04:20 PM | #8 |
Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Irving Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
We could of had HALI and Orakpo. F***!!!!!!!!
|
Posts: 421
|
11-09-2010, 04:25 PM | #9 |
MIZZOU
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Saint Joseph
Casino cash: $10005040
|
hindsight is 20/20
|
Posts: 1,076
|
11-09-2010, 04:59 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Top City
Casino cash: $10004900
|
|
Posts: 1,543
|
11-09-2010, 05:08 PM | #11 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2008
Casino cash: $5823814
|
TJ is the next Seymour / Pioli
|
Posts: 5,090
|
11-09-2010, 06:45 PM | #12 |
Under the Sofa
Join Date: Apr 2009
Casino cash: $10010607
|
TJ is the next Junior Siaavi
|
Posts: 4,907
|
11-09-2010, 08:44 PM | #13 |
Most Valuable Poster
Join Date: Oct 2003
Casino cash: $9490002
|
|
Posts: 36,649
|
11-09-2010, 09:11 PM | #14 |
Starter
Join Date: Sep 2009
Casino cash: $10010678
|
I believe everyone here was ready to throw Dorsey under a bus just a year ago, I still think the verdict is out on TJ, that being said I'm tired of waiting Seymour makes us better now. He would be able to apply the extra pressure we need apposite Hali, would be fun to watch. Not to mention he's a beast vs the run.
|
Posts: 40
|
11-09-2010, 09:13 PM | #15 | |
Hockey Town
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Casino cash: $2647050
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 110,785
|
|
|