When you play to lose

**the Talking Can** · 09-17-2006, 05:58 PM

...you lose.

Anyone who claims they didn't know we were going to lose in the 2nd half - deep down in your bones - is a LIAR.

run, run, 5 yard slant, punt
run, run, 5 yard out, punt
run, run, 5 yard slant, punt
run, run, 5 yard out, punt
run, run, 5 yard slant, punt
run, run, 5 yard out, punt
game over, loss
pretend we care about moral victories after all these years...rinse, wash...

As the Steelers showed, even with a back up QB you have to take some shots and TRY to win.

The BEST performance by a Chiefs D since DT died...sacrificed for Herm's blood lust for punting and losing.

WE SHOULD HAVE WON. But winning is too risky for Herm.

another weekend ruined....

Mecca · 09-17-2006, 06:00 PM

Ugh......Damon Huard was playing. We have no QB no LT, you wanna call a regular gameplan? It won't work period, that was an extremely well played game just to come that close to winning in these circumstances.

I'm really ****in tired of these threads, if they had done this with Green in fine bitch. It's Damon Huard what were you expecting the same offense?

kcxiv · 09-17-2006, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Ugh......Damon Huard was playing. We have no QB no LT, you wanna call a regular gameplan? It won't work period, that was an extremely well played game just to come that close to winning in these circumstances.

I'm really ****in tired of these threads, if they had done this with Green in fine bitch. It's Damon Huard what were you expecting the same offense?

Obviously he was. People cant freaking figure out that our Tackles suck, we cannot run the Coryell Offense. They had no real choice but to play how they did if they wanted to stay in the game. We would have been dow to Dee Brown at QB if we had a regular game plan.

milkman · 09-17-2006, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Ugh......Damon Huard was playing. We have no QB no LT, you wanna call a regular gameplan? It won't work period, that was an extremely well played game just to come that close to winning in these circumstances.

I'm really ****in tired of these threads, if they had done this with Green in fine bitch. It's Damon Huard what were you expecting the same offense?

I agree, without Trent and with our deficiencies at tackle, we can't expect to run the same offense.

We can't expect it when Green gets back.

But if the Chiefs had mixed in some play action passing on first down, they could have given the Donkeys something to think about besides LJ.

They don't have to be deep throws.

Jus something to mix it and help the running game.

Mecca · 09-17-2006, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I agree, without Trent and with our deficiencies at tackle, we can't expect to run the same offense.

We can't expect it when Green gets back.

But if the Chiefs had mixed in some play action passing on first down, they could have given the Donkeys something to think about besides LJ.

They don't have to be deep throws.

Jus something to mix it and help the running game.

I'll agree with you that's a very rationale assement that makes sense. I'm just getting tired of people who can't seem to realize we have gaping holes in this offense right now, we can't run the same offense anymore it just won't work.

Raiderhater · 09-17-2006, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

I'll agree with you that's a very rationale assement that makes sense. I'm just getting tired of people who can't seem to realize we have gaping holes in this offense right now, we can't run the same offense anymore it just won't work.

And I'm getting tired of you assuming that people are calling for the regular offense. What milkman posted is all that I have seen asked for. You are just too dense to pick it up, or too contrary to care.

Mecca · 09-17-2006, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raiderhader

And I'm getting tired of you assuming that people are calling for the regular offense. What milkman posted is all that I have seen asked for. You are just too dense to pick it up, or too contrary to care.

You apparently missed some of the other posts.......

**the Talking Can** · 09-17-2006, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Ugh......Damon Huard was playing. We have no QB no LT, you wanna call a regular gameplan? It won't work period, that was an extremely well played game just to come that close to winning in these circumstances.

I'm really ****in tired of these threads, if they had done this with Green in fine bitch. It's Damon Huard what were you expecting the same offense?

Where did I say we should have called our regular game plan? Could you provide that quote? Or maybe actually read a post before responding to it?

I said we had to take some shots in the 2nd half.

We were the better team. Even with Huard we deserved to win.

We didn't lose because of Huard we lost because Herm didn't trust our players. Victory was there for the taking....Denver took it.

I'll get over it...but it was a huge waste.

kcxiv · 09-17-2006, 06:00 PM

Give us Pittsburg's o line and i am all for it

blueballs · 09-17-2006, 06:15 PM

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/playby...0060917_KC@DEN

wolfpack0735 · 09-17-2006, 06:22 PM

since we are bound and determind to play ultra-conservitive on offnese,we should start croyle. it dosnt take much to hand the ball off and throw 5 yard passes. give the rookie playing time.

ChiefsFanatic · 09-17-2006, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

...you lose.

Anyone who claims they didn't know we were going to lose in the 2nd half - deep down in your bones - is a LIAR.

run, run, 5 yard slant, punt
run, run, 5 yard out, punt
run, run, 5 yard slant, punt
run, run, 5 yard out, punt
run, run, 5 yard slant, punt
run, run, 5 yard out, punt
game over, loss
pretend we care about moral victories after all these years...rinse, wash...

As the Steelers showed, even with a back up QB you have to take some shots and TRY to win.

The BEST performance by a Chiefs D since DT died...sacrificed for Herm's blood lust for punting and losing.

WE SHOULD HAVE WON. But winning is too risky for Herm.

another weekend ruined....

If you have a backup QB on your team that can only run 30% of your offense, why is he on your team?

Raiderhater · 09-17-2006, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsFanatic

If you have a backup QB on your team that can only run 30% of your offense, why is he on your team?

Because if he had the ability to run an entire offense he'd be a starter some place else.

Hootie · 09-17-2006, 06:25 PM

some of you need to learn the game of football.

The only ****ing chance we had to win the game, was doing exactly what we did today, eat clock, run the ball, use our punter, win the field position battle, and win the turnover battle. We did all but one, albeit the most important one, but taking Denver into OT AT Denver while missing your pro bowl QB isn't easy to do.

Seriously people, get a FRIGGIN' clue.

ChiefsFanatic · 09-17-2006, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

some of you need to learn the game of football.

The only ****ing chance we had to win the game, was doing exactly what we did today, eat clock, run the ball, use our punter, win the field position battle, and win the turnover battle. We did all but one, albeit the most important one, but taking Denver into OT AT Denver while missing your pro bowl QB isn't easy to do.

Seriously people, get a FRIGGIN' clue.

People who think like that should be on the coaching staff..................ummmm wait, they already are. Do you think the 3rd and 4th receiver can get away with only being able to run a third of our plays? How about the backup RB only knowing a third of the plays?

Why is it OK for a backup QB to only be able to run a third of our plays? If he can't run OUR offense, instead of HIS offense, then he should not be on the team.

09-17-2006, 05:58 PM	Topic Starter
the Talking Can Supporter Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: street Casino cash: $10022208	When you play to lose ...you lose. Anyone who claims they didn't know we were going to lose in the 2nd half - deep down in your bones - is a LIAR. run, run, 5 yard slant, punt run, run, 5 yard out, punt run, run, 5 yard slant, punt run, run, 5 yard out, punt run, run, 5 yard slant, punt run, run, 5 yard out, punt game over, loss pretend we care about moral victories after all these years...rinse, wash... As the Steelers showed, even with a back up QB you have to take some shots and TRY to win. The BEST performance by a Chiefs D since DT died...sacrificed for Herm's blood lust for punting and losing. WE SHOULD HAVE WON. But winning is too risky for Herm. another weekend ruined....
Posts: 51,585

09-17-2006, 06:00 PM	#2
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $2657050	Ugh......Damon Huard was playing. We have no QB no LT, you wanna call a regular gameplan? It won't work period, that was an extremely well played game just to come that close to winning in these circumstances. I'm really ****in tired of these threads, if they had done this with Green in fine bitch. It's Damon Huard what were you expecting the same offense?
Posts: 110,768

09-17-2006, 06:00 PM	#9
kcxiv In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Central Valley, Cali Casino cash: $8807996	Give us Pittsburg's o line and i am all for it
Posts: 29,110

09-17-2006, 06:15 PM	#10
blueballs Banned Join Date: Feb 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/playby...0060917_KC@DEN
Posts: 14,233

09-17-2006, 06:22 PM	#11
wolfpack0735 buttnaked is the only way tobe Join Date: May 2001 Location: B/T lost & nowhere in ks. Casino cash: $10008827	since we are bound and determind to play ultra-conservitive on offnese,we should start croyle. it dosnt take much to hand the ball off and throw 5 yard passes. give the rookie playing time. __________________ Three most important things in life... Chiefs football, Beer and women, all in that order!! Adopt - A - Chief Willie Lanier Old enough to remember WHAT a Super Bowl is!!
Posts: 534

09-17-2006, 06:25 PM	#14
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	some of you need to learn the game of football. The only ****ing chance we had to win the game, was doing exactly what we did today, eat clock, run the ball, use our punter, win the field position battle, and win the turnover battle. We did all but one, albeit the most important one, but taking Denver into OT AT Denver while missing your pro bowl QB isn't easy to do. Seriously people, get a FRIGGIN' clue.
Posts: 56,356