610/810 Chiefs Planet call-in mob?

[RealSNR]

This was mentioned in the Geno Smith thread. Matt Miller (draft dumbass extraordinaire) was on Border Patrol this morning. Whoever the host is for that show did an okay job trying to hammer out why Miller is such a flippant moron who wants us to take a ****ing OT but not a QB, even though he has Geno going to the Raiders at #3. His response was something like, "Oakland really likes Geno Smith. I make these drafts from a league-wide perspective, I'm not reporting for just one team. Geno is my 11th rated player on the board, so unless I hear that the Chiefs really want him, I'm not going to project him to the Chiefs at 1. Besides, they're a team that has a lot of needs, y'know... tack... well, potentially at tackle and uhhh... diarrhea diarrhea"

I'm sick of these draft douches thinking they know what's best for the Chiefs in their prognostications. You don't have to be high on any of the QBs to know that letting Albert walk and drafting his replacement at #1 overall is a ****ing TERRIBLE idea that improves the team ZERO PERCENT.

This guy will be on throughout draft season, as will a few others. Sorter and I have been chatting, and we want to plan a call-in blitz to these shows. Make them see the light. Most of the fans who call in just aren't sending the message hard enough.

Also, GoChiefs has generously volunteered to capture the audio and post it everywhere he can.

If you're interested, let us know. We'll try to find a date/time to call in to one of these shows and take control of the conversation the RIGHT way.

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by GoWalrus

He used to be a Matt Cassel fan.

He thinks we should draft Joeckel and move Albert to guard.......he's unsaveable.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

He thinks we should draft Joeckel and move Albert to guard.......he's unsaveable.

It doesn't matter, because once Geno is here and raping seals he'll apologize personally and bow down.

[philfree]

So players who are 10 yards off the LOS are in the box?

[PaulAllen]

Originally Posted by philfree

So players who are 10 yards off the LOS are in the box?

If they're in the secondary and your number one wideout is left completely wide open, then yeah I'd say that's about as close you can get

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by philfree

So players who are 10 yards off the LOS are in the box?

The entire defense on that play is anticipating a run on 4th and 1 and defending the play in that manner. The safeties are maybe a couple of yards outside the box but it's splitting hairs.

And the fact anyone thinks corners line up that way in a "base defense" is hilarious.

[philfree]

Originally Posted by GoWalrus

The entire defense on that play is anticipating a run on 4th and 1 and defending the play in that manner. The safeties are maybe a couple of yards outside the box but it's splitting hairs.

And the fact anyone thinks corners line up that way in a "base defense" is hilarious.

That's fine and they may be anticipating run but that's not 11 in the box. Guys 7,9 and 10 yards off the LOS are not in the box.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by philfree

So players who are 10 yards off the LOS are in the box?

Depends which direction.

If they're 10 yards off the line into the defensive backfield, they're paying HUGE dap to the WRs, and are getting in the best position possible to just tackle the receiver to the ground.

If they're 10 yards off the receiver closer to the QB/center, it means they don't give a shit what the WRs do, because they know the QB can't complete a pass to him. Most likely it will be a running play that they want to shut down.

Which one is that picture?

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by philfree

That's fine and they may be anticipating run but that's not 11 in the box. Guys 7,9 and 10 yards off the LOS are not in the box.

Seven yards is definitely in the box. Both safeties normally don't play as close as they are in that screenshot.

Bottom line: that is not a base defense in any way. You and Bob Fescoe are dumbasses.

[philfree]

Originally Posted by GoWalrus

Seven yards is definitely in the box. Both safeties normally don't play as close as they are in that screenshot.

Bottom line: that is not a base defense in any way. You and Bob Fescoe are dumbasses.

I didn't say it was a base defense and I don't care either way but it's not 11 in the box.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by philfree

I didn't say it was a base defense and I don't care either way but it's not 11 in the box.

It's pretty ****ing close. You're splitting hairs, and being obtuse.

[tony77]

Originally Posted by |Zach|

Why is it so important sports radio personalities feel the same way you do.

agree

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by GoWalrus

It's pretty ****ing close. You're splitting hairs, and being obtuse.

It's not a base defense, but it's not 11 in the box. What he's doing is being accurate. You're fudging for dramatic effect.

[philfree]

Originally Posted by GoWalrus

It's pretty ****ing close. You're splitting hairs, and being obtuse.

Close? So me counting 7 guys within 5 yards of the LOS and 4 guys at 7 or more yards from the LOS is obtuse? Whatever.

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by |Zach|

Why is it so important sports radio personalities feel the same way you do.

Because you hope the guys who are paid to do this actually know wtf they are talking about.

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by philfree

Close? So me counting 7 guys within 5 yards of the LOS and 4 guys at 7 or more yards from the LOS is obtuse? Whatever.

It's clear from that photo that all 11 defenders are selling out on the run. They're not even CLOSE to either of our wideouts. Meaning they don't respect Cassel one ****ing bit.

Is that more accurate?