John Dorsey agrees to be the Chiefs next GM

[ShowtimeSBMVP]

Reid Ferrin ‏@KCChiefs_Reid

John Dorsey agrees to be the Chiefs next GM. More info to come. #Chiefs

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

You're ****ing clueless.

The scouts job is to watch tape/go to games and evaluate talent. It's not to be a ****ing yes man.

The scout's job is to follow orders. The coach and GM dictate the scheme, and that creates the playbook that scouts have to follow. Their job is to go to games and evaluate talent BASED ON THE PLAYBOOK. They are told exactly what players they are supposed to find. From there, their evaluations trickle to the college scouting director, whose job is to listen to a gazillion scouting reports and sum up the bullet points concisely to the head personnel guy.

Don't blame the guys whose job is to pull together the reports. Blame the multiple levels of leaders above the scouts that are giving them crappy playbooks to follow and that don't do a good job of slotting for draft value. It's not the scout's job to fight with Pioli. That was Emery's job.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

While I hate *****, he ran a very good scouting network.

Bullshit.

I can't believe you're still touting that mother****ing piece of shit.

[DeezNutz]

The Chiefs couldn't and didn't draft for shit during *****'s tenure, yet our "scouting network" was strong?

Yeah, not buying this one single bit. ***** didn't know the first thing about scouting, acquiring, or developing talent. Biggest fraud in NFL history.

And I'd like to thank the mods for wiping his name from this board. The ***** filter is brilliant.

Mother**** you for all time, *****.

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

The scout's job is to follow orders. The coach and GM dictate the scheme, and that creates the playbook that scouts have to follow. Their job is to go to games and evaluate talent BASED ON THE PLAYBOOK. They are told exactly what players they are supposed to find. From there, their evaluations trickle to the college scouting director, whose job is to listen to a gazillion scouting reports and sum up the bullet points concisely to the head personnel guy.

Don't blame the guys whose job is to pull together the reports. Blame the multiple levels of leaders above the scouts that are giving them crappy playbooks to follow and that don't do a good job of slotting for draft value. It's not the scout's job to fight with *****. That was Emery's job.

Link to prove that the various area scouts were producing high-quality information?

[CoMoChief]

great hire

[The Bad Guy]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Bullshit.

I can't believe you're still touting that mother****ing piece of shit.

The takes are just incredible.

It's like he lives in another football universe.

The depth on this team sucks, but the scouts were good?

Get ****ing lost.

[Mother****erJones]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Bullshit.

I can't believe you're still touting that mother****ing piece of shit.

how did he have a good network? All his picks suck except his OLB Houston. Egoli can go get hit by a ****ing train and i wouldnt give 2 dicks

[Mr_Tomahawk]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

While I hate *****, he ran a very good scouting network.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by O.city

Sorry, another question, my bad.

Quit apologizing dude lol

[Brock]

zilla zillaing it up again.

[Mother****erJones]

FYI Scott COULDNT have listened to scouts. His ego wouldnt allow it. He hired Yes men

[The Bad Guy]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

The scout's job is to follow orders. The coach and GM dictate the scheme, and that creates the playbook that scouts have to follow. Their job is to go to games and evaluate talent BASED ON THE PLAYBOOK. They are told exactly what players they are supposed to find. From there, their evaluations trickle to the college scouting director, whose job is to listen to a gazillion scouting reports and sum up the bullet points concisely to the head personnel guy.

Don't blame the guys whose job is to pull together the reports. Blame the multiple levels of leaders above the scouts that are giving them crappy playbooks to follow and that don't do a good job of slotting for draft value. It's not the scout's job to fight with *****. That was Emery's job.

Why are scouts fighing with anyone? They are information feeders. They write their reports based on their evaluations.

Good ****ing christ.

[The Bad Guy]

Originally Posted by Brock

zilla zillaing it up again.

No shit.

No one hijacks a thread with awful football takes like this clown.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

You think Peterson's scouts were limited, but *****'s weren't?

Based on what? Our incredible late round drafting the last 4 years?

Peterson had a reputation for pulling a lot of players from his network. Even in the late rounds. Made a ton of picks from the Pac 10.

Pioli made the picks based on scouting intelligence. I am convinced he gave his scouts a shitty playbook to follow. How many better picks would we have made if we were recruiting 1-gap players? What about the year Pioli demanded that his scouts pull only captains? Do you blame the scouts for the decision to never take a QB? And Pioli was the stubborn piece of shit that always tried to prove he could field a team with support players. Which is why he reached for so many players.

I wouldn't blame Pioli's shitty draft philosophy on the scouts. I don't know what kind of world people think the football world is where a scout would have anywhere near the power to argue against Pioli.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Bullshit.

I can't believe you're still touting that mother****ing piece of shit.

Only you would take anything I'm saying about Pioli right now as any kind of compliment.