Would you give up next year's #1 pick for Surtain?

Chiefs Pantalones · 03-09-2005, 10:05 PM

Me, I'd give up the 2nd rounder the Dolphins are asking for, but if Carl thinks (keyword is "thinks") he can get a good player this time after all these years with the 2nd round pick, then why not give up next year's 1st round pick? If the Chiefs are planning to do so well, that pick won't mean as much because it would be around 25 to 32nd overall.

UteChief · 03-09-2005, 10:07 PM

Nope, I would give up this years fourth and next years third or possible second depending on playing time and such.

**the Talking Can** · 03-09-2005, 10:08 PM

no way

Dayze · 03-09-2005, 10:11 PM

No. Because the Curse of the Chiefs will only allow them to go 4-12 after making such a deal - thus surrendering a top 5 pick.

Chiefnj · 03-09-2005, 10:14 PM

Nope.

WebGem · 03-09-2005, 10:18 PM

32nd?

**Bowser** · 03-09-2005, 10:19 PM

Hell no.

If the Rams can pull off getting Marshall Faulk for a 2nd and a 5th, why can't we do the same for Surtain? This year's second, next year's fifth.

el borracho · 03-09-2005, 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser

Hell no.

If the Rams can pull off getting Marshall Faulk for a 2nd and a 5th, why can't we do the same for Surtain? This year's second, next year's fifth.

I hope you are kidding.

el borracho · 03-09-2005, 10:23 PM

Oh, and to answer the question in the thread starter: No.

**Bowser** · 03-09-2005, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho

I hope you are kidding.

I'm not saying Faulk and Surtain are the same quality player, if that's what you mean.

Logical · 03-09-2005, 10:31 PM

Why on earth would we do that when all we have to do is give up this years number 2. That would be fucking insane. Carl at least occasionally gets someone like Tony Gonzalez and DT in the first round.

Nightfyre · 03-09-2005, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Special Ed

Me, I'd give up the 2nd rounder the Dolphins are asking for, but if Carl thinks (keyword is "thinks") he can get a good player this time after all these years with the 2nd round pick, then why not give up next year's 1st round pick? If the Chiefs are planning to do so well, that pick won't mean as much because it would be around 25 to 32nd overall.

Are you high?

keg in kc · 03-09-2005, 10:33 PM

No. I think NE set the market with the Starks trade, and because of that either our second this year or our first next year is too high. Make it the '06 second and I'm game. I'd even throw in a 5th this year.

03-09-2005, 10:34 PM

Absolutely not. I think Surtain could even be cut. Why the hell would we give up a pick?

Archie Bunker · 03-09-2005, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre

Are you high?

I am

03-09-2005, 10:05 PM
Chiefs Pantalones GO CHIEFS!!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $7938717	Would you give up next year's #1 pick for Surtain? Me, I'd give up the 2nd rounder the Dolphins are asking for, but if Carl thinks (keyword is "thinks") he can get a good player this time after all these years with the 2nd round pick, then why not give up next year's 1st round pick? If the Chiefs are planning to do so well, that pick won't mean as much because it would be around 25 to 32nd overall.
Posts: 26,629

03-09-2005, 10:07 PM	#2
UteChief Veteran Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: SLC, UT Casino cash: $9065460	Nope, I would give up this years fourth and next years third or possible second depending on playing time and such.
Posts: 1,671

03-09-2005, 10:08 PM	#3
the Talking Can Supporter Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: street Casino cash: $10022208	no way __________________ Clark Hunt: "Thank god for the Dominican pool boy"
Posts: 51,585

03-09-2005, 10:11 PM	#4
Dayze Resident Glue Sniffer Join Date: Nov 2003 Casino cash: $5219358	No. Because the Curse of the Chiefs will only allow them to go 4-12 after making such a deal - thus surrendering a top 5 pick. __________________ Life is 99% inspiration, 1% Perspiration, and 1% Attention to Detial. RIP & Godspeed: Saccoppo Lonewolf Ed Fire Me Boy
Posts: 37,358

03-09-2005, 10:14 PM	#5
Chiefnj MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Willis, Harris and Davis. Casino cash: $10004900	Nope. __________________ "I always tell (the assistant coaches), 'Make it simple, 'cause I'm stupid,'" Edwards said. "This ain't computer football." Herm Edwards, 3-20-07 Q: Herm, back on December 25th you were asked if Trent Green was your starter going into next season and you said, ‘yeah, why wouldn’t he be?’ Have you changed your mind on that? EDWARDS: No, I have not.” (1-11-07)
Posts: 6,811

03-09-2005, 10:18 PM	#6
WebGem MVP Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: NYC/Toronto/Mexico Casino cash: $9994900	32nd? __________________ Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bmifsud
Posts: 7,009

03-09-2005, 10:19 PM	#7
Bowser sorta mod-ish Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: KC North Casino cash: $3481616	Hell no. If the Rams can pull off getting Marshall Faulk for a 2nd and a 5th, why can't we do the same for Surtain? This year's second, next year's fifth.
Posts: 100,554

03-09-2005, 10:23 PM	#9
el borracho In Pat We Trust Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Albuquerque, NM Casino cash: $6429148	Oh, and to answer the question in the thread starter: No.
Posts: 11,815

03-09-2005, 10:31 PM	#11
Logical Screw U if U can't take a joke Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Why on earth would we do that when all we have to do is give up this years number 2. That would be fucking insane. Carl at least occasionally gets someone like Tony Gonzalez and DT in the first round.
Posts: 31,579

03-09-2005, 10:33 PM	#13
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	No. I think NE set the market with the Starks trade, and because of that either our second this year or our first next year is too high. Make it the '06 second and I'm game. I'd even throw in a 5th this year.
Posts: 58,682

03-09-2005, 10:34 PM	#14
Phobia Guest Casino cash: $	Absolutely not. I think Surtain could even be cut. Why the hell would we give up a pick?
Posts: n/a