Modern Warfare 2

[Buck]

PS3 Players: (ChiefsPlanet Name - PS3 Name)

Buck - BuckinKaeding
DMAC - Hytee-Dytee
evolve27 - evolve27
KCKID58 - KCNUT58
lostcause - robsonan
Mr. Flopnuts - USHLAGRANADA
Priest31kc - Priestkc31
SDChiefs - Synnakle1
SLAG - slag_02
Sofa King = BushwhackerBoyd
TinyEvel - TinyEvel
tyton75 - Tyton1975

Xbox 360 Players: (ChiefsPlanet Name - 360 Name)

AndChiefs - UnknownNewbie
Buck - LaMesaCharger
Cjizzles - chyeahhh son
Crashride - HEYISTHATCHICKN
Dunit35 - dyer35
'Hamas' Jenkins - T3sticleKuffs
HC_Chief - Caedes Tactus
JOhn - WyoChief
KC native - dez 1ne
KcGopher - KcGopher
Kraus - Trespasser 989
Metrolike - pants0n (not sure if thats an o or a zero)
Molitoth - Molitoth
Mr. Plow - HawkInHutch
Nightfyre - tehchuck
Nixhex - nixhex78
Pittsie - Cannon Fragger
QuikSsurfer - Quikies83
Stormtrooper - St0RmxTmTr00peR
WhitiE - White Es Back


IF YOU WANT YOUR NAME ON THESE LISTS, PM ME your CP Name - Video Game Name

I.E. PM Me....... Buck - LaMesaCharger

so I can just copy and paste it

[Sofa King]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

HE'S BACK ****ERS!!!!

what in the f-bomb is this guy all about?

[Katipan]

I PRESTIGED LAST NIGHT ON THE WII.

So take that.

****ing purists.

FYI. I played on the PS3 the other day. I can't do it. I physically can not make my fingers do two opposite motions at the same time.

[Pants]

Originally Posted by Third Eye

Yeah, TDM is a TEAM game. UAVs are far more helpful to the TEAM.

I'm pretty sure an instant win is more beneficial to the team, dumbass.

[Third Eye]

Originally Posted by Metrolike

I'm pretty sure an instant win is more beneficial to the team, dumbass.

Wow, nice hostility. Guess I'm just too stupid to realize that I could call in about 100 uavs for every opportunity to call in one nuke.

[Pants]

Originally Posted by Third Eye

Wow, nice hostility. Guess I'm just too stupid to realize that I could call in about 100 uavs for every opportunity to call in one nuke.

Ehhh, sorry, maybe I read your post in the wrong tone. It's hard to do online. Sorry for calling you a name. I see what you're saying now, I thought you were saying that people shouldn't call in nukes if they have them equipped because it's selfish. I agree with you on the last point.

[Buck]

T-Minus 14 days until new maps are out. We should Michael Myers on Overgrown.

[Pants]

Originally Posted by Buck

T-Minus 14 days until new maps are out. We should Michael Myers on Overgrown.

Sounds about right.

[Third Eye]

Originally Posted by Metrolike

Ehhh, sorry, maybe I read your post in the wrong tone. It's hard to do online. Sorry for calling you a name. I see what you're saying now, I thought you were saying that people shouldn't call in nukes if they have them equipped because it's selfish. I agree with you on the last point.

Ahh, no problem then.

[Quesadilla Joe]

What do you guys think is best?? Harrier and Pave Low at the same time or one at a time?

[HC_Chief]

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

What do you guys think is best?? Harrier and Pave Low at the same time or one at a time?

I like both at once.... more fire to rack up Ks before someone takes them out with a Stinger.

[Pants]

Originally Posted by HC_Chief

I like both at once.... more fire to rack up Ks before someone takes them out with a Stinger.

I think any air support without flares is a waste. This is why I go Pavelow, Chopper Gunner only as far as air. Besides, Harriers are a huge risk of FF in Hardcore, IMO.

[Quesadilla Joe]

Originally Posted by HC_Chief

I like both at once.... more fire to rack up Ks before someone takes them out with a Stinger.

That is what I think. It is a lot harder for people with rockets to shoot down one of them when you have both going at once.

I just wasn't sure if someone thinks that you get more kills doing one at a time.

[Pants]

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

That is what I think. It is a lot harder for people with rockets to shoot down one of them when you have both going at once.

I just wasn't sure if someone thinks that you get more kills doing one at a time.

You would get more kills by using one at a time if people don't get a chance to shoot them down, otherwise your air is competing for the same kills, which hurts even more if there's a respawn timer.

[Quesadilla Joe]

Originally Posted by Metrolike

You would get more kills by using one at a time if people don't get a chance to shoot them down, otherwise your air is competing for the same kills, which hurts even more if there's a respawn timer.

I only play FFA. HC is too boring for me, it seems like every HC game I have played was a big campfest. Plus it gets on my nerves when I am playing in team games when it seems that I am the only one supplying the team with UAV's. **** helping everyone else out when they aren't doing the same, there is no reason not to have a constant UAV in team games.

[Mr. Plow]

Originally Posted by HC_Chief

I like both at once.... more fire to rack up Ks before someone takes them out with a Stinger.

If HC, no sense in using them both at the same time.