Chiefs Alex Smith to Chiefs? - Page 8

**FRCDFED** · 08-19-2011, 10:20 AM

2011 NFL Trade Rumors – Alex Smith to Chiefs?

August 18, 2011 08:10 PM EDT

comments: 1

Alex Smith has been given several opportunities to win over the front office and fans of the San Francisco 49ers, but the former NFL first-round draft pick has been inconsistent throughout his career, and it could be time for a change in scenery.

The 49ers drafted a quarterback for their future and now are looking to bring in a veteran quarterback to lead the team for a year and let Colin Kaepernick learn the ropes from someone other than Smith.

The latest trade rumor has Smith being sent to the Kansas City Chiefs in a deal that will give Smith a fresh start, and the Chiefs badly needed backup to Matt Cassel. Kansas City now has just rookie fifth-round draft choice Ricky Stanzi as the teams backup, and an injury to Cassel could be harmful to the team's success in the upcoming NFL season.

The good news for Chiefs fans is that Smith would be a cheap acquisition, and it would give the team some much-needed insurance at the quarterback position. If San Francisco brings in a veteran in the next week or two, look for Smith to become a member of a different team before the season begins.

Just Passin' By · 08-19-2011, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58

What is funny is the 49ers were talking about bringing in Culpepper. Even they think Culpepper is an upgrade over Smith to backup Kapernick.

Then why did they sign McCown instead of Culpepper?

ForeverChiefs58 · 08-19-2011, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan

That's because the fans hate him and chanted for Carr. Sort of like people here saying that no team would give up a pick for Cassel.

God, I hope Cassel can turn things around and show everyone he is a good QB this year playing the top defenses. But even if he didn't he already showed with the Patriots he can come in as a backup and not lose a game for his team. Alex Smith has never shown that. That is why the fans hate him so much and would rather he headbutt a flaming AIDS tree than play QB even as a backup.

ForeverChiefs58 · 08-19-2011, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Or the fact that the organization wants nothing to do with Smith because he didn't live up to his hype.

Yeah, especially passing on Rogers for Smith. Mike Mcarthy is now very happy.

But after they went from Joe Montana to Steve Young it makes me sick to hear them complain about QB's.

xztop12 · 08-19-2011, 03:56 PM

Hahaha some guy named Larry writes an amateur article and it gets 8 pages of posts on here. What an astute bunch you all are.

ForeverChiefs58 · 08-19-2011, 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Then why did they sign McCown instead of Culpepper?

Yeah they went with McCown over Culpepper. They are both pretty horrible.

McCown started 31 games in eight seasons in the NFL with four different teams. No matter what the depth chart says, I can't imagine he is ahead of Kapernick when the season starts.

Just Passin' By · 08-19-2011, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58

Yeah they went with McCown over Culpepper. They are both pretty horrible.

McCown started 31 games in eight seasons in the NFL with four different teams. No matter what the depth chart says, I can't imagine he is ahead of Kapernick when the season starts.

But your claim was that they found Culpepper to be better. Are you saying that the new regime is deliberately passing over the better players in order to keep stiffs (that they didn't even draft) in the starting lineup?

ForeverChiefs58 · 08-19-2011, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

But your claim was that they found Culpepper to be better. Are you saying that the new regime is deliberately passing over the better players in order to keep stiffs (that they didn't even draft) in the starting lineup?

I don't think very many people believed Smith would be on the team when the season started. The Smith experiment in San Fran hasn't worked. So looking at Culpepper, McCown or anyone else would be to backup Kapernick.

No way can Kapernick be worse than Smith or those other scrubs.

Titty Meat · 08-19-2011, 04:09 PM

If we're going to trade a pick for a QB i'd rather trade for Mike Kafkha.

Just Passin' By · 08-19-2011, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58

I don't think very many people believed Smith would be on the team when the season started. The Smith experiment in San Fran hasn't worked. So looking at Culpepper, McCown or anyone else would be to backup Kapernick.

No way can Kapernick be worse than Smith or those other scrubs.

Except that, right now, Kapernick is worse than Smith.

**The Franchise** · 08-19-2011, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Except that, right now, Kapernick is worse than Smith.

You're not going to talk him out of his hate for all things Alex Smith.

I seriously think Alex Smith ran over his dog or ****ed his mom.

ForeverChiefs58 · 08-19-2011, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Except that, right now, Kapernick is worse than Smith.

Well, according to the OP

"The 49ers drafted a quarterback for their future and now are looking to bring in a veteran quarterback to lead the team for a year and let Colin Kaepernick learn the ropes from someone other than Smith."

They are more ok with Kaepernick learning from McCown than Smith.

My point is if they are not ok with Smith as a backup we shouldn't be either.

ForeverChiefs58 · 08-19-2011, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

You're not going to talk him out of his hate for all things Alex Smith.

I seriously think Alex Smith ran over his dog or ****ed his mom.

He went to run over my dog, missed and hit a fire hydrant. I posted earlier I wouldn't even let him try and **** my mother cause he would fumble it up and then miss her by 5 yards.

**The Franchise** · 08-19-2011, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58

He went to run over my dog, missed and hit a fire hydrant. I posted earlier I wouldn't even let him try and **** my mother cause he would fumble it up and then miss her by 5 yards.

Yeah....it was stupid back then when you said it.....anddddddddd it's still stupid now.

RustShack · 08-19-2011, 04:38 PM

51/53 really isn't that bad for a backup QB. Especially considering hes coming from such a bad and messed up organization. Odds are pretty good that Stanzi will throw more picks than TD's this year just like most rookies would just being thrown out to the wolves. I don't know what his contract is, but I wouldn't be against him being here for insurance for a year or two at MOST until Stanzi has a full grasp on everything. Even if Stanzi had a full offseason here, at least 9/10 times a rookie QB isn't going to be ready to take over.

ForeverChiefs58 · 08-19-2011, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Yeah....it was stupid back then when you said it.....anddddddddd it's still stupid now.

I disagree with you. Deal with it. You don't have to be such a ****ing asshole.

08-19-2011, 10:20 AM
FRCDFED Line'em up Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: somewhere out there Casino cash: $9326297	Alex Smith to Chiefs? 2011 NFL Trade Rumors – Alex Smith to Chiefs? August 18, 2011 08:10 PM EDT comments: 1 Alex Smith has been given several opportunities to win over the front office and fans of the San Francisco 49ers, but the former NFL first-round draft pick has been inconsistent throughout his career, and it could be time for a change in scenery. The 49ers drafted a quarterback for their future and now are looking to bring in a veteran quarterback to lead the team for a year and let Colin Kaepernick learn the ropes from someone other than Smith. The latest trade rumor has Smith being sent to the Kansas City Chiefs in a deal that will give Smith a fresh start, and the Chiefs badly needed backup to Matt Cassel. Kansas City now has just rookie fifth-round draft choice Ricky Stanzi as the teams backup, and an injury to Cassel could be harmful to the team's success in the upcoming NFL season. The good news for Chiefs fans is that Smith would be a cheap acquisition, and it would give the team some much-needed insurance at the quarterback position. If San Francisco brings in a veteran in the next week or two, look for Smith to become a member of a different team before the season begins.
Posts: 3,184

08-19-2011, 03:56 PM	#109
xztop12 Starter Join Date: May 2010 Casino cash: $10004900	Hahaha some guy named Larry writes an amateur article and it gets 8 pages of posts on here. What an astute bunch you all are.
Posts: 785

08-19-2011, 04:09 PM	#113
Titty Meat Inmem 2.0 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: My house Casino cash: $2307558	If we're going to trade a pick for a QB i'd rather trade for Mike Kafkha.
Posts: 75,063

08-19-2011, 04:38 PM	#119
RustShack **** That Noise Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Jack Trice Casino cash: $4726954	51/53 really isn't that bad for a backup QB. Especially considering hes coming from such a bad and messed up organization. Odds are pretty good that Stanzi will throw more picks than TD's this year just like most rookies would just being thrown out to the wolves. I don't know what his contract is, but I wouldn't be against him being here for insurance for a year or two at MOST until Stanzi has a full grasp on everything. Even if Stanzi had a full offseason here, at least 9/10 times a rookie QB isn't going to be ready to take over. __________________
Posts: 15,047