Who is our starting QB?

**BigMeatballDave** · GBM 8-12-15

Who do you want under center?

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 08-24-2007, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave

Who do you want under center?

Peyton Manning.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 08-24-2007, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

Peyton Manning.

Ooohhh. I wanna play.

Tom Brady.

**BigMeatballDave** · 08-24-2007, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

Peyton Manning.

I should've know. You guys cannot be left alone...

KCJohnny · 08-24-2007, 05:52 PM

What? No write in vote for Jeff Terrell?

htismaqe · 08-24-2007, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCJohnny

What? No write in vote for Jeff Terrell?

Please.

PastorMikH · 08-24-2007, 04:42 PM

Croyle without question.

Huard isn't the future of this team. Huard is NOT a starting QB in the NFL. Not only has he been able to land a starting gig in all the time he's been in the NFL, he didn't even garner much interest as a starter by other teams before extending his contract here last spring. Starting Huard just wastes crucial developement time for Croyle. The ONLY way I start Huard first is if our OL can't protect a QB.

The only way Croyle can learn is to take snaps. The absolute worst that can happen under Croyle is we lose a bunch of games, realize he isn't our QBOTF and have a high draft pick for a QB in '08.

Huard might limp us along into the playoffs. But we will depend heavily on LJ again, run him into the ground, maybe out, and still get knocked out of the first round.

Croyle on the other hand, if he gets playing time, by the end of the season he could be rather surprising and if we make the playoffs with him, I think he'd give us a chance to win in the playoffs.

Like I said in another thread, if Huard is going to be our starter this season, we should cut Croyle all together because we'll just end up wasting him on the bench anyway.

RedThat · 08-24-2007, 04:45 PM

it depends.

If the Chiefs suck this year, I wouldn't mind if Croyle started because they have nothing to lose.

But with LJ back there, and possibly a good defense, I wouldn't mind if Huard started either. As long as he does what he did last year. Just play a simple style, and don't turn the ball over or try to win us games either. I think he could do that.

*Too be honest with you, I have mixed feelings about who to start

Coach · 08-24-2007, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull

it depends.

If the Chiefs suck this year, I wouldn't mind if Croyle started because they have nothing to lose.

But with LJ back there, and possibly a good defense, I wouldn't mind if Huard started either. As long as he does what he did last year. Just play a simple style, and don't turn the ball over or try to win us games either. I think he could do that.
*Too be honest with you, I have mixed feelings about who to start

Lighting, meet bottle.

I don't think Huard will even come close to his 98.0 rating that he put up last year.

dreaminboutsunday · 08-24-2007, 05:27 PM

Chiefs = Love ...if you really love the chiefs, does it really matter who the damn qb is?? NO! CHIEFS FANS are chiefs fans, through and through. but i choose brody croyle

GO CHIEFS!

MichaelH · 08-24-2007, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dreaminboutsunday

Chiefs = Love ...if you really love the chiefs, does it really matter who the damn qb is?? NO! CHIEFS FANS are chiefs fans, through and through. but i choose brody croyle

GO CHIEFS!

I agree to a point but I do care who the damn QB is. I don't think either will take us to the post season but Croyle has more long term potential.

PastorMikH · 08-24-2007, 05:30 PM

To the Huard hopfull, can LJ stand another season of "Keep in simple so the QB doesn't lose it" game planning?

If Croyle isn't the QBOTF, wouldn't it be good to settle that this year instead of having him sit on the bench for a year, having Herm rave about him, and passing on a legit QBOTF next year because we have Croyle waiting to take the reigns?

If we are going to go with an old vet, we should have kept Green. IMO he looked like he was back to old form in the KC/Miami game.

EyePod · 08-24-2007, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedBull

it depends.

If the Chiefs suck this year, I wouldn't mind if Croyle started because they have nothing to lose.

But with LJ back there, and possibly a good defense, I wouldn't mind if Huard started either. As long as he does what he did last year. Just play a simple style, and don't turn the ball over or try to win us games either. I think he could do that.

*Too be honest with you, I have mixed feelings about who to start

He did turn the ball over, just not in interceptions. He was a Fumble-Roni.

Archie Bunker · 08-24-2007, 04:50 PM

IMO this season isn't about W-L its about getting ready for a Super Bowl run in 08 and 09 so Brodie is my guy.

Even if I thought this team was a contender this year I would still pick Croyle because of his arm and mobility. Plus Huard has done NOTHING to win this job in preseason. Croyle has atleast shown flashes.

**HemiEd** · 08-24-2007, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PastorMikH

Croyle without question.

The ONLY way I start Huard first is if our OL can't protect a QB.

.

Do you think the line is going to be able to protect the QB? They need to improve in a major way.

View Poll Results: Who?
Brodie	65	79.27%
Damon	17	20.73%
Voters: 82. You may not vote on this poll

08-24-2007, 04:33 PM	Topic Starter
BigMeatballDave GBM 8-12-15 Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Dayton, Oh. Casino cash: $10052154	Who is our starting QB? Who do you want under center?
Posts: 59,997

08-24-2007, 05:52 PM	#5
KCJohnny Blind, deceived homer Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Maryland, USA Casino cash: $10004900	What? No write in vote for Jeff Terrell? __________________
Posts: 6,347

08-24-2007, 04:42 PM	#7
PastorMikH Will KC ever be better? Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Land of Red Dirt & Necks Casino cash: $9955087	Croyle without question. Huard isn't the future of this team. Huard is NOT a starting QB in the NFL. Not only has he been able to land a starting gig in all the time he's been in the NFL, he didn't even garner much interest as a starter by other teams before extending his contract here last spring. Starting Huard just wastes crucial developement time for Croyle. The ONLY way I start Huard first is if our OL can't protect a QB. The only way Croyle can learn is to take snaps. The absolute worst that can happen under Croyle is we lose a bunch of games, realize he isn't our QBOTF and have a high draft pick for a QB in '08. Huard might limp us along into the playoffs. But we will depend heavily on LJ again, run him into the ground, maybe out, and still get knocked out of the first round. Croyle on the other hand, if he gets playing time, by the end of the season he could be rather surprising and if we make the playoffs with him, I think he'd give us a chance to win in the playoffs. Like I said in another thread, if Huard is going to be our starter this season, we should cut Croyle all together because we'll just end up wasting him on the bench anyway. __________________
Posts: 20,453

08-24-2007, 04:45 PM	#8
RedThat Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Earth Casino cash: $10004900	it depends. If the Chiefs suck this year, I wouldn't mind if Croyle started because they have nothing to lose. But with LJ back there, and possibly a good defense, I wouldn't mind if Huard started either. As long as he does what he did last year. Just play a simple style, and don't turn the ball over or try to win us games either. I think he could do that. *Too be honest with you, I have mixed feelings about who to start
Posts: 6,666

08-24-2007, 05:27 PM	#10
dreaminboutsunday King Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Olathe Casino cash: $10004900	Chiefs = Love ...if you really love the chiefs, does it really matter who the damn qb is?? NO! CHIEFS FANS are chiefs fans, through and through. but i choose brody croyle GO CHIEFS!
Posts: 41

08-24-2007, 05:30 PM	#12
PastorMikH Will KC ever be better? Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Land of Red Dirt & Necks Casino cash: $9955087	To the Huard hopfull, can LJ stand another season of "Keep in simple so the QB doesn't lose it" game planning? If Croyle isn't the QBOTF, wouldn't it be good to settle that this year instead of having him sit on the bench for a year, having Herm rave about him, and passing on a legit QBOTF next year because we have Croyle waiting to take the reigns? If we are going to go with an old vet, we should have kept Green. IMO he looked like he was back to old form in the KC/Miami game. __________________
Posts: 20,453

08-24-2007, 04:50 PM	#14
Archie Bunker The Wait Is Over Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Random Small Town Casino cash: $2078978	IMO this season isn't about W-L its about getting ready for a Super Bowl run in 08 and 09 so Brodie is my guy. Even if I thought this team was a contender this year I would still pick Croyle because of his arm and mobility. Plus Huard has done NOTHING to win this job in preseason. Croyle has atleast shown flashes.
Posts: 6,191