Saunders play calling in the second half deserves a lot of the blame

PunkinDrublic · 11-28-2004, 04:54 PM

Why the **** did the Chiefs abandon the run and instead opt for those stupid swing passes. The offense was running the ball all over the Chargers and they went away from what was working. Also what's with this running back by committee bullshit were seeing. Stick with one starter preferably Blaylock. If the Chiefs would have stuck with running the football instead of that stupid ass dumping the ball in the flat play they would have controlled the time of possesion and scored a couple of badly needed touchdowns in the second half. The running game is what kicks our offense into gear and opens up the passing game. Monday night the Chiefs were able to move the ball with balanced playcalling even though Blaylock was getting about 1ypc. Monday night they stuck with running the ball and it opened up the passing game. Losing to the Chargers is un-****ing-acceptable I don't care how much better they are than they used to be. Having a home game against San Diego on the Chiefs schedule is equivalent to the free space in bingo.

David. · 11-28-2004, 04:56 PM

blahblah

OCChargerFan · 11-28-2004, 05:07 PM

Sorry, your bitter but don't bad mouth us. I gave you guys props for playing a good game but you're just not a good team for a number of reasons, injuries included.

**Phobia** · 11-28-2004, 05:09 PM

Saunders is purposefully tanking games now. He's looking forward to the new toys he'll get next April with the first 2 picks in the draft.

Warrior5 · 11-28-2004, 05:12 PM

At this point in the season, this quote could easily read as follows:

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunkinDrublic

Losing to the Chiefs is un-****ing-acceptable...having a game against the Chiefs is equivalent to the free space in bingo.

Which Chief in Oakland will be the next to fumble inside the 10-yard line on his way to an almost-sure TD? Gonzo? Holmes? Vote in our on-line poll at www.BattleoftheBasementDwellers.com.

gblowfish · 11-28-2004, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warrior5

At this point in the season, this quote could easily read as follows: Which Chief in Oakland will be the next to fumble inside the 10-yard line on his way to an almost-sure TD? Gonzo? Holmes? Vote in our on-line poll at www.BattleoftheBasementDwellers.com.

Hey...that's a phony URL. What the....???

PunkinDrublic · 11-28-2004, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OCChargerFan

Sorry, your bitter but don't bad mouth us. I gave you guys props for playing a good game but you're just not a good team for a number of reasons, injuries included.

The Chiefs aren't a good team because they consistantly beat themselves week in and week out. I'll respect the chargers more when they can string together a couple of winning seasons and stop being the division doormat every other year. Wow Drew Brees was able to pass all over our defense that's only been done by every one of our opponents!!

David. · 11-28-2004, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunkinDrublic

The Chiefs aren't a good team because they consistantly beat themselves week in and week out. I'll respect the chargers more when they can string together a couple of winning seasons and stop being the division doormat every other year. Wow Drew Brees was able to pass all over our defense that's only been done by every one of our opponents!!

they're 8-3, you can

now.

PunkinDrublic · 11-28-2004, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David.

they're 8-3, you can

now.

They've been floating by on a weak schedule so you can

.

David. · 11-28-2004, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunkinDrublic

They've been floating by on a weak schedule so you can

.

you're nuts. NUTS

**dirk digler** · 11-28-2004, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunkinDrublic

They've been floating by on a weak schedule so you can

.

So did we last year.

**Phobia** · 11-28-2004, 05:28 PM

Weak schedule is a misnomer in today's NFL. Every division has the SAME opponents save 2 conference squads. If the Chiefs were 2 games behind the Chargers, we'd have something to discuss. The Chargers had the Jets and Browns instead of our Patriots and Ravens. If you really think the Jets and Browns would have pushed us over .500, you're barking up the wrong tree.

PunkinDrublic · 11-28-2004, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

Weak schedule is a misnomer in today's NFL. Every division has the SAME opponents save 2 conference squads. If the Chiefs were 2 games behind the Chargers, we'd have something to discuss. The Chargers had the Jets and Browns instead of our Patriots and Ravens. If you really think the Jets and Browns would have pushed us over .500, you're barking up the wrong tree.

I'm not saying the Chiefs are much better. If I sound bitter it's because I am. It's one thing if the Chiefs didn't have the talent to win but the offensive play calling today kept the Chiefs from destroying an overmatched defense IMO. The Chiefs have been underachieving team all year and losing at home to teams like the Texans and the Chargers is a real lowpoint for me.

FloridaChief · 11-28-2004, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PunkinDrublic

I'll respect the chargers more when they can string together a couple of winning seasons and stop being the division doormat every other year.

You can start respecting the Chargers now 'cause there's a new doormat in town...

tk13 · 11-28-2004, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

If you really think the Jets and Browns would have pushed us over .500, you're barking up the wrong tree.

I think we could've scored 105 points on the Browns today...

11-28-2004, 04:54 PM
PunkinDrublic Reign in Bayside! Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Dallas, Tx Casino cash: $35240	Saunders play calling in the second half deserves a lot of the blame Why the ** did the Chiefs abandon the run and instead opt for those stupid swing passes. The offense was running the ball all over the Chargers and they went away from what was working. Also what's with this running back by committee bullshit were seeing. Stick with one starter preferably Blaylock. If the Chiefs would have stuck with running the football instead of that stupid ass dumping the ball in the flat play they would have controlled the time of possesion and scored a couple of badly needed touchdowns in the second half. The running game is what kicks our offense into gear and opens up the passing game. Monday night the Chiefs were able to move the ball with balanced playcalling even though Blaylock was getting about 1ypc. Monday night they stuck with running the ball and it opened up the passing game. Losing to the Chargers is un-**ing-acceptable I don't care how much better they are than they used to be. Having a home game against San Diego on the Chiefs schedule is equivalent to the free space in bingo.
Posts: 5,081

11-28-2004, 04:56 PM	#2
David. . Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: University of Missouri Casino cash: $24230	blahblah
Posts: 8,167

11-28-2004, 05:07 PM	#3
OCChargerFan Rookie Join Date: Nov 2004 Casino cash: $1000	Sorry, your bitter but don't bad mouth us. I gave you guys props for playing a good game but you're just not a good team for a number of reasons, injuries included.
Posts: 11

11-28-2004, 05:09 PM	#4
Phobia Together is Powerful Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $2115225584	Saunders is purposefully tanking games now. He's looking forward to the new toys he'll get next April with the first 2 picks in the draft.
Posts: 52,474

11-28-2004, 05:28 PM	#12
Phobia Together is Powerful Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $2115225584	Weak schedule is a misnomer in today's NFL. Every division has the SAME opponents save 2 conference squads. If the Chiefs were 2 games behind the Chargers, we'd have something to discuss. The Chargers had the Jets and Browns instead of our Patriots and Ravens. If you really think the Jets and Browns would have pushed us over .500, you're barking up the wrong tree.
Posts: 52,474

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode