Importance to the offense who would you have picked?

Logical · 03-21-2006, 04:08 PM

TRich

A declining W. Shields

Both epitomize the Chiefs it would have been best if they both could have retired a Chief. But given the Choice who would you have picked to keep?

Sully · 03-21-2006, 04:09 PM

T-Rich, actually.
We have a guard to fill in (just not a tackle)
T-Rich was a road grader on the GL. Hopefully Cruz can be as well. He was working out at my gym last week. No point to that, just name dropping.

JBucc · 03-21-2006, 04:11 PM

We have other guards, and Shields costs a lot more money. So if I had a choice I'd rather Shields retired and T-Rich stayed. But I'm fine the way it is.

Logical · 03-21-2006, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBucc

We have other guards, and Shields costs a lot more money. So if I had a choice I'd rather Shields retired and T-Rich stayed. But I'm fine the way it is.

Kind of my thought as well.

el borracho · 03-21-2006, 05:02 PM

You forgot the "neither" option (not that I would have picked it).

I chose Shields over Richardson. Seriously, we can get another fullback.

Lemon Pie · 03-21-2006, 05:11 PM

i wasn't expecting Shields to play this season so I have already convinced myself that Welbourne would be a nice replacement. Although a nice surprise having Shields back, I'd rather have T-rich.

StcChief · 03-21-2006, 05:18 PM

If you can't have both.
Shields.

Hopefully Cruz, Wilson, Dunn can step in and be the front man to LJ

CHENZ A! · 03-21-2006, 05:19 PM

As much as I hate to see either of them go, Shields still dominates his position.

KCChiefsFan88 · 03-21-2006, 06:16 PM

Will Shields without a doubt. T-Rich was a great player, but his role in the offense was decreasing.

**patteeu** · 03-21-2006, 07:02 PM

TRich is declining too. Will Shields is and always has been more valuable.

Cochise · 03-21-2006, 07:08 PM

Guards are more valuable than fullbacks. Guards are on the field 100% of offensive downs. Richardson was on the field, what, 33% of downs?

unlurking · 03-21-2006, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise

Guards are more valuable than fullbacks. Guards are on the field 100% of offensive downs. Richardson was on the field, what, 33% of downs?

Agreed.

Shootr · 03-21-2006, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sully

He was working out at my gym last week. No point to that, just name dropping.

I saw him at the gym, too. Did he look kinda small to you?

seclark · 03-21-2006, 07:48 PM

i voted t-rich...but i'm football ignernt.
sec

KC_John · 03-21-2006, 08:00 PM

Keep Shields without question..thoo Carl is a fooking idiot to let Trich go. WTf else is he spending the money on...there had better be a good surprise in the Chiefs FA signing future to justify this move.

View Poll Results: Given the Choice who would you have picked to keep?
T Rich	10	27.03%
W Shields	25	67.57%
I am just observing	2	5.41%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

03-21-2006, 04:08 PM
Logical Screw U if U can't take a joke Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $94931	Importance to the offense who would you have picked? TRich A declining W. Shields Both epitomize the Chiefs it would have been best if they both could have retired a Chief. But given the Choice who would you have picked to keep?
Posts: 31,579

03-21-2006, 04:09 PM	#2
Sully Good Merlinpeen to all!!! Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Lees Summit Casino cash: $26777	T-Rich, actually. We have a guard to fill in (just not a tackle) T-Rich was a road grader on the GL. Hopefully Cruz can be as well. He was working out at my gym last week. No point to that, just name dropping. __________________ "Let's all get the same girl pregnant, tonight!"
Posts: 12,229

03-21-2006, 04:11 PM	#3
JBucc MVP Join Date: Oct 2005 Casino cash: $13531	We have other guards, and Shields costs a lot more money. So if I had a choice I'd rather Shields retired and T-Rich stayed. But I'm fine the way it is.
Posts: 12,009

03-21-2006, 05:02 PM	#5
el borracho Bears fan since 2013 Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Albuquerque, NM Casino cash: $27900	You forgot the "neither" option (not that I would have picked it). I chose Shields over Richardson. Seriously, we can get another fullback.
Posts: 9,973

03-21-2006, 05:11 PM	#6
Lemon Pie Banned Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Texas Casino cash: $13514	i wasn't expecting Shields to play this season so I have already convinced myself that Welbourne would be a nice replacement. Although a nice surprise having Shields back, I'd rather have T-rich.
Posts: 1,621

03-21-2006, 05:18 PM	#7
StcChief Playing for #1 Draft Pick Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Just West of Lambs land Casino cash: $1024708	If you can't have both. Shields. Hopefully Cruz, Wilson, Dunn can step in and be the front man to LJ __________________ sig test for this screwy schema
Posts: 25,902

03-21-2006, 05:19 PM	#8
CHENZ A! you make me smile Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: OPKS Casino cash: $56965	As much as I hate to see either of them go, Shields still dominates his position. __________________
Posts: 5,847

03-21-2006, 06:16 PM	#9
KCChiefsFan88 Wanted: A Franchise QB Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Miami, FL Casino cash: $32816	Will Shields without a doubt. T-Rich was a great player, but his role in the offense was decreasing.
Posts: 6,950

03-21-2006, 07:02 PM	#10
patteeu The 23rd Pillar Join Date: Sep 2002 Casino cash: $416875	TRich is declining too. Will Shields is and always has been more valuable. __________________ Obamacare’s fix for an American health care system that the federal government long ago broke, is to give the federal government far more power over American health care; that its solution to escalating health costs is to mandate greater health benefits (and, hence, higher costs); and that its solution to the pricey overreliance on pre-paid health plans — offered by insurance companies in lieu of real insurance — is to have the government require Americans to buy those pre-paid health plans under penalty of law.
Posts: 67,168

03-21-2006, 07:08 PM	#11
Cochise MVP Join Date: May 2003 Casino cash: $60	Guards are more valuable than fullbacks. Guards are on the field 100% of offensive downs. Richardson was on the field, what, 33% of downs?
Posts: 34,302

03-21-2006, 07:48 PM	#14
seclark MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: nemo Casino cash: $377	i voted t-rich...but i'm football ignernt. sec
Posts: 9,310

03-21-2006, 08:00 PM	#15
KC_John Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Hoosier Daddy? Casino cash: $1000	Keep Shields without question..thoo Carl is a fooking idiot to let Trich go. WTf else is he spending the money on...there had better be a good surprise in the Chiefs FA signing future to justify this move.
Posts: 294

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode