Home Mail MemberMap Chat (0) Wallpapers
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > The Lounge

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2007, 07:32 PM  
Smed1065 Smed1065 is offline
Supporter
 
Smed1065's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: QB Land
Casino cash: $2002834
Jaguars Violating the "First Law of Hoes"

A view from an opposition writer. Sounds like KC in a lot of ways to me.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Ed Thompson
NFL Writer, Scout.com
Posted Oct 6, 2007


The Jaguars had one of the most-feared rushing attacks in the NFL in 2006. Although Fred Taylor and Maurice Jones-Drew are back, the Jaguars haven't been getting the same results. Scout.com's Ed Thompson points out some of the prominent problems.

During the Jacksonville Jaguars' bye week, one aspect of their offensive attack that certainly had to be at the forefront of concern was how to get the running game back on track.

As they head into their fourth game of the season against the Kansas City Chiefs, the Jaguars' rushing offense is averaging 124.7 yards per game -- 13th-best in the NFL. As committed to the run as ever, the Jaguars are rushing an average of 32.7 times per game this year compared to 32.1 rushing attempts per game last year.

But the results have been much different.

In 2006, Jacksonville posted 158.8 yards-per-game rushing, third-best in the league while averaging 4.95 yards per carry (second-best in the league).

This year, they're only averaging 3.82 yards per carry (21st in the league) even though they're featuring the same two running backs -- Fred Taylor and Maurice Jones-Drew.

Instead of being a feared as one of the league's leading rushing attacks, the Jaguars' early-season results have been rather ... well, ordinary. Without significant progress in their passing attack to compensate for it, Jacksonville appears to have lost some ground offensively since last year. And they need to get it fixed if they don't want to slip far behind the 4-0 Colts.

That said, the wheels haven't totally fallen off the cart. The Jaguars are still doing some things well in the rushing arena.

They haven't lost the ability to break big runs of 10-plus yards. After the first three weeks of play, (when all teams had just three games under their belts) Jacksonville's 11 big-play runs put them in the top ten in that category out of the league's 32 teams.

NFL teams generally consider any run of more than 4 yards to be a successful play. Jacksonville is just barely above the league median (midpoint result), gaining at least 5 yards on 43.9 percent of their runs, 15th-best in the NFL. And they've been effective on second-down, averaging a 4.56 yards-per-carry -- thirteenth-best in the league -- roughly half-a-yard higher per-carry than the average NFL team.

But Jacksonville is having a tougher time avoiding stuffs that result in negative yardage plays. Excluding kneel-down plays by the quarterback to kill the clock, the Jaguars have had ten negative yardage rushing plays already this season. So on 10.6 percent of their runs, they've been losing ground -- the 13th-highest rate in the league. Last year, they only lost yardage on 7.6 percent of their plays. Nine of those ten stuffs have been almost equally at the expense of Taylor (5) and Jones-Drew (4).

But what's really haunting the team is their poor results on first down. Is there anyone in an NFL stadium who doesn't expect to see the Jaguars running the ball on first down these days? Their lack of creativity and confidence in their passing game has been an anchor around the ankles of Taylor and Jones-Drew.

While the Jaguars ran the ball 60.8 percent of the time on first-down last year (sixth-highest in the league), they've upped that to 68 percent so far this year (second-highest) despite results that are telling them it's not a very smart decision. The Jaguars are getting a successful run play of 5 yards or more just 37.3 percent of the time -- ninth worst in the league, despite having two talented running backs. Meanwhile, the average NFL team is hitting roughly 43-44 percent. And guess what? Six of the Jaguars' 10 negative-yardage rushing plays this year have come on first-down plays.

And if there's any doubt that the team's lack of creativity on first down is contributing to their rushing game woes, consider this -- they've managed two yards or less on 21 of their first-down runs. That was the worst record in the league in that category until the Jaguars got to sit out last week while some other teams racked up a few more of those plays in Week 4 action.

Bottom line? Last year, the Jaguars averaged 5.55 yards per run on first down (third-best in the NFL). This year they're averaging 3.16 yards, dropping them to 24th in the league.

But maybe where they are focusing their attack is playing a role in the lackluster results as well.

This year the Jaguars are running 65 percent of their plays between the inside shoulders of the guards versus 61 percent last year. They've run to the right 18 percent of the time versus 21 percent last year, and to the left 17 percent of the time versus 18 percent last year. So the distribution of runs isn't wildly different.

But here's something that really sticks out. While their rushing average per play is down 0.7 yards to left side versus last year and 0.3 yards to the right, their average gain up the middle behind the interior line is down almost 1.5 yards per carry (3.67 this year versus 5.16 last year). And that's particularly problematic when you're choosing to run the ball between the guards 65 percent of the time and even slightly more often than last year.

The Jaguars are simply violating the "First Law of Holes" as stated years ago by British politician Denis Healey.

"If you are in one, stop digging," he said.

Wise words. But for some bizarre reason, the Jaguars are running more often on first downs and continuing to run a high-percent of their rushing attempts up the middle even though it's putting their rushing attack in a deeper hole.

It'll be interesting to see if and how head coach Jack Del Rio has adjusted his offensive game plan after two weeks of evaluating the misfires in the running game during the opening weeks of the 2007. Will he have David Garrard throw more on first down? Will he test the perimeters with his rushing attack a bit more often?

Or will he keep on violating the "First Law of Hoes"?

http://nflexperts.scout.com/2/687785.html

Last edited by Smed1065; 10-06-2007 at 11:16 PM..
Posts: 8,859
Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 07:37 PM   #2
Skip Towne Skip Towne is offline
Supporter
 
Skip Towne's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: T-Town
Casino cash: $1109186
Nobody talk about holes except Endelt.
Posts: 69,672
Skip Towne < CasselSkip Towne < CasselSkip Towne < CasselSkip Towne < CasselSkip Towne < CasselSkip Towne < CasselSkip Towne < CasselSkip Towne < CasselSkip Towne < CasselSkip Towne < CasselSkip Towne < Cassel
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 07:37 PM   #3
DenverDanChiefsFan DenverDanChiefsFan is offline
coo coo ca choo
 
DenverDanChiefsFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Donkey Central
Casino cash: $969230
what ever happened to cliff notes?
Posts: 2,477
DenverDanChiefsFan would the whole thing.DenverDanChiefsFan would the whole thing.DenverDanChiefsFan would the whole thing.DenverDanChiefsFan would the whole thing.DenverDanChiefsFan would the whole thing.DenverDanChiefsFan would the whole thing.DenverDanChiefsFan would the whole thing.DenverDanChiefsFan would the whole thing.DenverDanChiefsFan would the whole thing.DenverDanChiefsFan would the whole thing.DenverDanChiefsFan would the whole thing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 07:41 PM   #4
chagrin chagrin is offline
Giggitty!
 
chagrin's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando, Florida
Casino cash: $8163
my god, thanks for nothing dude
__________________
I'll try to be nice to you, if you stop being such an idiot
Posts: 13,334
chagrin must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chagrin must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chagrin must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chagrin must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chagrin must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chagrin must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chagrin must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chagrin must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chagrin must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chagrin must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chagrin must have mowed badgirl's lawn.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 07:49 PM   #5
Deberg_1990 Deberg_1990 is offline
MVP
 
Deberg_1990's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx.
Casino cash: $178928
Tell me about it.....Jones-Drew has been killing my fantasy team this year. I thought he was going to have a HUGE season.


Im thinking about starting him tomorrow because the one weakness of the Chiefs D so far this year is the run D.
__________________
Originally Posted by Cassel's Reckoning:

Matt once made a very nice play in Seattle where he spun away from a pass rusher and hit Bowe off his back foot for a first down.

One of the best plays Matt has ever made.
Posts: 49,161
Deberg_1990 has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.Deberg_1990 has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.Deberg_1990 has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.Deberg_1990 has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.Deberg_1990 has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.Deberg_1990 has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.Deberg_1990 has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.Deberg_1990 has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.Deberg_1990 has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.Deberg_1990 has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.Deberg_1990 has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 10:53 PM   #6
Count Zarth Count Zarth is online now
Emperor of the Universe
 
Count Zarth's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $10240602
Ed Thompson is not an "opposition" writer. He's the Colts scout.com publisher.
Posts: 165,286
Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 10:58 PM   #7
Smed1065 Smed1065 is offline
Supporter
 
Smed1065's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: QB Land
Casino cash: $2002834
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOATSE
Ed Thompson is not an "opposition" writer. He's the Colts scout.com publisher.

So he roots for the Chiefs?

Kewl, it has worked in the past.

Glad it was not an AFC team.
__________________
Always next year but.........there is 2015!
Posts: 8,859
Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 10:59 PM   #8
Smed1065 Smed1065 is offline
Supporter
 
Smed1065's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: QB Land
Casino cash: $2002834
Quote:
Originally Posted by chagrin
my god, thanks for nothing dude
Put me on iggy then.

Not too many quote me.
__________________
Always next year but.........there is 2015!
Posts: 8,859
Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 11:41 PM   #9
Ugly Duck Ugly Duck is offline
Proof: ChargerFanz DO exist!
 
Ugly Duck's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Petaluma, CA, USA
Casino cash: $42832
Quote:
Originally Posted by denverdanchiefsfan
what ever happened to cliff notes?
writer's block....
__________________
Posts: 9,840
Ugly Duck is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Ugly Duck is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Ugly Duck is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Ugly Duck is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Ugly Duck is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Ugly Duck is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Ugly Duck is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Ugly Duck is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Ugly Duck is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Ugly Duck is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Ugly Duck is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2007, 11:45 PM   #10
Smed1065 Smed1065 is offline
Supporter
 
Smed1065's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: QB Land
Casino cash: $2002834
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ugly Duck
writer's block....

Because I thought you might have comprehension skills of your own?

Guess not.

Of course I could take UD view of jumping on any error instead of facts.
__________________
Always next year but.........there is 2015!
Posts: 8,859
Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.Smed1065 would the whole thing.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.