|
|
|
#2 |
|
The 23rd Pillar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Casino cash: $416186
|
I think Huckabee has a shot at being the running mate of either Giuliani or Romney. Maybe even McCain. As much as I'm not attracted to him, myself, he'd be good as an attack surrogate and he'd be good in the debates.
I think you make some good guesses in your OP. I think Richardson with Obama is a good fit. I'm not sure Biden would want to be VP. jAZ mentioned Wesley Clark as a possible VP for Hilary and I think that would make a lot of sense. In fact, he might be good for any of the dems.
__________________
![]() "After voters re-elected an administration that added five trillion dollars to the nation’s debt, left 23 million Americans unemployed, surrendered Iraq to America’s enemy Iran, and enabled the Muslim Brotherhood to gain control of the largest country in the Middle East, the one lesson Republicans should agree on is that elections are driven by emotions, not reason." - David Horowitz |
|
Posts: 67,066
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Black for Palestine
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
Casino cash: $1166358
|
Quote:
Not so sure about Obama. I'm not sure how Clark would work into Obama's philosophy of change. |
|
|
Posts: 37,466
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Tucson, AZ
Casino cash: $43034
|
I think part of the problem with you list is that you seem a little overly (though definately not exclusively) focused on the VP coming from the ranks of the current candidates.
Clinton will pick Clark. He entered the 2004 race, IMO, purely to get experience and visiblity so that he could be her VP in 2008. He set's up perfectly. I also think Clark would be good for Obama... and he definately is a outsider seeking to bring change to DC. But Clark isn't the sure thing with Obama that he is with Clinton. I think you guys make a great point about Richardson for VP w/ Obama. I could see him doing that, and him throwing his support behind Obama tommorrow night (were it to happen) would go a long way towards that. I think with McCain, it's another done deal, IMO. Sam Brownback endorsed McCain for a reason. And it's likely played a sizable role in McCain's momentum. Lieberman won't leave the Dems unless they pull his committee chair. I just don't see him being the guy for McCain. I could see Huckabee grabbing Rudy as his VP. They have a cozy relationship, IRC. Jake thought it was going to be the other way around, but I could see Rudy serving Huck well. Not sure his ego would allow it. |
|
Posts: 24,700
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Casino cash: $3875
|
Clark will without a doubt be Hillary's VP if she wins the nomination. He endorsed Hillary early on despite the fact that you wouldn't think she'd be his #1 choice given his beliefs. He would be the perfect compliment for Hillary. His military experience would be great to allieviate questions about her foreign policy/national security credentials while the fact that he's adored by the progressive wing of the democratic party would be great given that she generally doesn't do well with the moew liberal wing of the party.
For Obama, I think Richardson would make a great VP with all his experience. On the republican side, Huckabee would be ideal for a lot of the other contenders. Especially people like Romney, Rudy (ok fine, he's no longer a contender) or McCain. |
|
Posts: 327
![]() |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
the great pumpkin
Join Date: Jul 2002
Casino cash: $43412
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Posts: 747
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|