Home Mail MemberMap Chat (0) Wallpapers
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > The Ed & Dave Lounge > Media Center

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2010, 12:24 PM  
Buck Buck is offline
Take a Chill Pill
 
Buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Casino cash: $509
Star Trek 12 Gets Release Date

I'm not sure if its Star Trek 12 or Star Trek 2, but the release date is June 29, 2012.

http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2010/01/11...-nothing-else/

UPDATE: Paramount has confirmed to MTV that the projected release date for the "Star Trek" sequel is indeed June 29, 2012.

This counts as news, but there's not much to it. We all know there's a "Star Trek" sequel coming. Hell, Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci, writers/producers of the May reboot, were talking about sequel possibilities as far back as the week after the first movie came out. Now we have a date to pin our hopes to: June 29, 2012.

Nothing else is known or announced, so don't ask. Maybe director J.J. Abrams will return to helm the sequel, maybe he won't. Maybe Khan will be the villain, maybe not. For all we know, the plan is to give us an epic "Star Trek Meets Star Wars" crossover. Could happen, right?

The news comes from a variety of sources, including Ain't It Cool News and Box Office Mojo, but there's no Paramount-issued press release that I can find. The information ran through some trustworthy sources, but we've yet to receive comment from the studio directly.

Regardless, there really hasn't ever been any doubt that we'd be seeing more "Star Trek." Abrams' take on the series made it friendly to an entirely new, much wider audience than its ever known before.

Were you anything less than certain that a "Star Trek" sequel was coming eventually? Where would you like the story to go from where it is now? Any specific hopes for the sequel?
Posts: 42,072
Buck is obviously part of the inner Circle.Buck is obviously part of the inner Circle.Buck is obviously part of the inner Circle.Buck is obviously part of the inner Circle.Buck is obviously part of the inner Circle.Buck is obviously part of the inner Circle.Buck is obviously part of the inner Circle.Buck is obviously part of the inner Circle.Buck is obviously part of the inner Circle.Buck is obviously part of the inner Circle.Buck is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 02:19 PM   #841
DJ's left nut DJ's left nut is offline
Gonna take a break for awhile.
 
DJ's left nut's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $5000
Wait a minute....

V'ger is the returned Voyager probe, launched in the 20th century and well before the events of the reboot, including the new reality - yes? And everything V'ger did is completely independent of anything Kirk or the rest of the federation would've done, correct?

In other words, nothing that transpired in the re-boot would've stopped V'ger from coming to earth and doing exactly what happened in Trek 1.

So technically speaking, won't the 'new' Enterprise crew have to deal with V'ger at some point?
__________________
If you can't draw a crowd, draw dicks on the wall.

2013 Adopt-A-Chief: AJ Jenkins, WR #13
Posts: 19,563
DJ's left nut is obviously part of the inner Circle.DJ's left nut is obviously part of the inner Circle.DJ's left nut is obviously part of the inner Circle.DJ's left nut is obviously part of the inner Circle.DJ's left nut is obviously part of the inner Circle.DJ's left nut is obviously part of the inner Circle.DJ's left nut is obviously part of the inner Circle.DJ's left nut is obviously part of the inner Circle.DJ's left nut is obviously part of the inner Circle.DJ's left nut is obviously part of the inner Circle.DJ's left nut is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 02:22 PM   #842
Fried Meat Ball! Fried Meat Ball! is offline
Cast Iron Jedi
 
Fried Meat Ball!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Casino cash: $6812
VARSITY
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut View Post
Wait a minute....

V'ger is the returned Voyager probe, launched in the 20th century and well before the events of the reboot, including the new reality - yes? And everything V'ger did is completely independent of anything Kirk or the rest of the federation would've done, correct?

In other words, nothing that transpired in the re-boot would've stopped V'ger from coming to earth and doing exactly what happened in Trek 1.

So technically speaking, won't the 'new' Enterprise crew have to deal with V'ger at some point?
Theoretically, yes.
Posts: 23,220
Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 02:33 PM   #843
Bowser Bowser is offline
Eff an A, Cotton!!
 
Bowser's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In Transition
Casino cash: $6170
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut View Post
Wait a minute....

V'ger is the returned Voyager probe, launched in the 20th century and well before the events of the reboot, including the new reality - yes? And everything V'ger did is completely independent of anything Kirk or the rest of the federation would've done, correct?

In other words, nothing that transpired in the re-boot would've stopped V'ger from coming to earth and doing exactly what happened in Trek 1.

So technically speaking, won't the 'new' Enterprise crew have to deal with V'ger at some point?
Posts: 52,256
Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.Bowser is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 02:40 PM   #844
keg in kc keg in kc is offline
oxymoron
 
keg in kc's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: OP/KC/Whatever
Casino cash: $5782
The events of the motion picture wouldn't occur for another 13 years in the alternate universe.
Posts: 51,454
keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.keg in kc is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 04:15 PM   #845
Red Brooklyn Red Brooklyn is offline
Veteran
 
Red Brooklyn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Casino cash: $5482
I really liked Into Darkness. But I really liked the 09 version, too. So, no big surprise. Not a perfect film, but really well executed sequel and a fun reboot/alternate interpretation of events. This whole alternate timeline thing is just brilliant.

I have no idea if they'll do a third. I hope so. Because the set up after this guy is awesome. The next one could be something special. We can actually move forward instead of dancing sideways.

Last edited by Red Brooklyn; 06-14-2013 at 10:26 PM..
Posts: 3,437
Red Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitelli
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 06:25 PM   #846
Frazod Frazod is offline
Banned
 
Frazod's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: my own personal pig hell
Casino cash: $5050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Branden Albert's Huge Balls View Post
He slammed it.
Is there something about watching Plinkett that makes you stupid?

He didn't slam it. In fact, he seemed to like it more than any of the other Star Trek films he reviewed.

Posts: 91,125
Frazod < CasselFrazod < CasselFrazod < CasselFrazod < CasselFrazod < CasselFrazod < CasselFrazod < CasselFrazod < CasselFrazod < CasselFrazod < CasselFrazod < Cassel
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 07:10 PM   #847
BigBeauford BigBeauford is offline
Veteran
 
BigBeauford's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lenexa, KS
Casino cash: $6094
So Star Trek snobs on here look forward more to , than liking this excellent movie? Give me a break. This movie is easily the best that I have viewed this year.
Posts: 1,107
BigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitelli
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 10:01 PM   #848
Count Zarth Count Zarth is offline
JUST SAY NO
 
Count Zarth's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by qbsacker93 View Post
So Star Trek snobs on here look forward more to , than liking this excellent movie? Give me a break. This movie is easily the best that I have viewed this year.
You know nothing about what makes a good Star Trek movie.
__________________
The Chiefs will finish 5-11, Alex Smith will play horribly, and Geno and I will cackle with glee while he burns Kansas City.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace View Post
I may be brain dead who knows.
Posts: 167,620
Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 10:26 PM   #849
Red Brooklyn Red Brooklyn is offline
Veteran
 
Red Brooklyn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Casino cash: $5482
Quote:
Originally Posted by Branden Albert's Huge Balls View Post
You know nothing about what makes a good Star Trek movie.
Tired argument is tired.
Posts: 3,437
Red Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitelli
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 04:35 AM   #850
Fried Meat Ball! Fried Meat Ball! is offline
Cast Iron Jedi
 
Fried Meat Ball!'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2004
Casino cash: $6812
VARSITY
Man of Steel was better.
Posts: 23,220
Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fried Meat Ball! is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 10:34 AM   #851
unlurking unlurking is offline
Venator
 
unlurking's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2003
Casino cash: $5854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Brooklyn View Post
I really liked Into Darkness. But I really liked the 09 version, too. So, no big surprise. Not a perfect film, but really well executed sequel and a fun reboot/alternate interpretation of events. This whole alternate timeline thing is just brilliant.

I have no idea if they'll do a third. I hope so. Because the set up after this guy is awesome. The next one could be something special. We can actually move forward instead of dancing sideways.
I enjoyed the reboot, even though I expected to hate it. The alternate timeline idea really pissed me off. I love Star Trek. I wanted more Star Trek, not rehashed Star Trek. The reboot gave that too me when I didn't think it could. I was very pleasantly surprised.

Star Trek 2.2 is the reason I hated the alternate timeline idea. All of my objections to rebooting the series came through in this rehashed Khan movie. It just seemed like a mish mash of Trek lore. Sadly, I loved Cumberbatch, and he makes a great villain. He makes a shitty Khan. The The role reversal, triblles, and immortality serum just seemed to take the laziness of story writing to a new extreme. One that was satisfyingly lacking in the 09 reboot, but shoved in my face in 2.2.

If 2.3 has whales, VGER, Khan (I'm expecting he escaped his ship's destruction), aircraft carriers, terraforming missiles, etc. I will be skipping it. I should have skipped 2.2 knowing Khan was in it.
__________________

Posts: 8,004
unlurking has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.unlurking has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.unlurking has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.unlurking has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.unlurking has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.unlurking has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.unlurking has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.unlurking has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.unlurking has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.unlurking has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.unlurking has just been standing around suckin' on a big ol' chili dog.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 10:44 AM   #852
Count Zarth Count Zarth is offline
JUST SAY NO
 
Count Zarth's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire Me Boy! View Post
Man of Steel was better.
It would be hard NOT to be better.

Any decent science fiction movie with an original plot/story > Into Darkpiss
__________________
The Chiefs will finish 5-11, Alex Smith will play horribly, and Geno and I will cackle with glee while he burns Kansas City.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace View Post
I may be brain dead who knows.
Posts: 167,620
Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 11:53 AM   #853
BigBeauford BigBeauford is offline
Veteran
 
BigBeauford's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Lenexa, KS
Casino cash: $6094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Branden Albert's Huge Balls View Post
It would be hard NOT to be better.

Any decent science fiction movie with an original plot/story > Into Darkpiss
Agreed, we have never had 's backstory hashed out in multiple forms of media by different directors/visionaries over multiple decades.
Posts: 1,107
BigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliBigBeauford 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitelli
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 11:54 AM   #854
Count Zarth Count Zarth is offline
JUST SAY NO
 
Count Zarth's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by qbsacker93 View Post
Agreed, we have never had 's backstory hashed out in multiple forms of media by different directors/visionaries over multiple decades.
Well, I haven't seen the new movie, but nerd consensus seems to be that it's pretty awesome, and not a ripoff.
__________________
The Chiefs will finish 5-11, Alex Smith will play horribly, and Geno and I will cackle with glee while he burns Kansas City.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace View Post
I may be brain dead who knows.
Posts: 167,620
Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.Count Zarth is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 01:57 PM   #855
Red Brooklyn Red Brooklyn is offline
Veteran
 
Red Brooklyn's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Casino cash: $5482
Quote:
Originally Posted by unlurking View Post
Star Trek 2.2 is the reason I hated the alternate timeline idea. All of my objections to rebooting the series came through in this rehashed Khan movie. It just seemed like a mish mash of Trek lore. Sadly, I loved Cumberbatch, and he makes a great villain. He makes a shitty Khan. The The role reversal, triblles, and immortality serum just seemed to take the laziness of story writing to a new extreme. One that was satisfyingly lacking in the 09 reboot, but shoved in my face in 2.2.

If 2.3 has whales, VGER, Khan (I'm expecting he escaped his ship's destruction), aircraft carriers, terraforming missiles, etc. I will be skipping it. I should have skipped 2.2 knowing Khan was in it.
To each their own. But it didn't feel like a rehash to me (outside of the obvious moments of borrowed plot, which only really amounted to like five minutes of screen time). It was just a new introduction to a standard original series character. It continued the same things I loved about the reboot. It gave us a new introduction/take on a classic character. And Kahn was much more interesting and fleshed out than Bana's Romulan. Big improvement there, I thought.

And this is all way before the timeframe of Wrath of Kahn. If Into Darkness is a rehash, it's a rehash of the original series Kahn episode.

I wonder if it's just because it's the second in the new series and Kahn was the second film in the original run. Would people have been bothered if they'd waited until the fifth or sixth film to do a Kahn story?

Into Darkness probably isn't quite as good as Star Trek (09). But I did actually like it more than Wrath. I would have preferred less direct homage, but I think they pulled it off. It's all explained very well. It's clever and gripping. And I was on the edge of my seat the whole time. I even got a bit teary at times.

The tribble in the middle of the scene was awkward and pure set up. That could have been handled more gracefully. And the resurrection was strained. But it could have been worse. And it's not like anyone expected dude to stay dead.

It's nice that we finally have the Enterprise out on its mission. I think that has the potential to open up the new timeline. I'm excited to see where they take it.
Posts: 3,437
Red Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby PiscitelliRed Brooklyn 's adopt a chief was Sabby Piscitelli
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.