Home Mail MemberMap Chat (0) Wallpapers
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > The GET IN MAH BELLY! Lounge > D.C.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-25-2011, 02:22 PM  
notorious notorious is offline
I Lay Wood for a Living
 
notorious's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Who knows?
Casino cash: $1169
How/Why are checkpoints legal?

How/Why are checkpoints legal?






I have never had a problem at one, and when I do get selected the police usually take one look at me and send me on my way. Although they are not very intrusive, what gives them the right?
Posts: 30,137
notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 02:28 PM   #2
Cave Johnson Cave Johnson is offline
Andy the Big Reid Coach
 
Cave Johnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: E. Bumf***istan
Casino cash: $93214
Quote:
Originally Posted by notorious View Post
How/Why are checkpoints legal?

I have never had a problem at one, and when I do get selected the police usually take one look at me and send me on my way. Although they are not very intrusive, what gives them the right?
Per the Rehnquist court, the stops are minimally intrusive and serve a strong public interest.

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/06/15/us...eckpoints.html
Posts: 9,575
Cave Johnson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Cave Johnson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Cave Johnson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Cave Johnson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Cave Johnson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Cave Johnson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Cave Johnson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Cave Johnson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Cave Johnson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Cave Johnson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Cave Johnson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 02:30 PM   #3
notorious notorious is offline
I Lay Wood for a Living
 
notorious's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Who knows?
Casino cash: $1169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pittsie View Post
Per the Rehnquist court, the stops are minimally intrusive and serve a strong public interest.

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/06/15/us...eckpoints.html

Short and sweet.


Thanks.


We basically forfeit a very small amount of freedom for safety.
Posts: 30,137
notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 02:30 PM
trndobrd
This message has been deleted by trndobrd. Reason: overly snippy for a reasonable question
Old 03-25-2011, 02:32 PM   #4
notorious notorious is offline
I Lay Wood for a Living
 
notorious's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Who knows?
Casino cash: $1169
Quote:
Originally Posted by trndobrd View Post
No, they are not legal. It's just that in the 20+ years that police have been using them, and in the resulting thousands of DUI cases, no defense attorney has ever thought to challenge the use of DUI checkpoints.
That is a LOT of $$$ going to the city and state, not to mention $$$ going to lawyers.


There is no reason to challenge it.
Posts: 30,137
notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 02:43 PM   #5
CrazyPhuD CrazyPhuD is offline
Meow
 
CrazyPhuD's Avatar
 
Pandemic Version 2 Champion Simon Champion
Join Date: Jun 2005
Casino cash: $1615695
Well sure they probably aren't legal, but the other truth is that realistically no one should ever be convicted of a DUI as a result of them(unless obviously they are grossly drunk). Why? They can stop you but they can't force you to take a field sobriety test. In absence of a field sobriety test how can they convict you of a DUI at a checkpoint? There is no reasonable suspicion that you are drunk. You weren't pulled over for weaving and unless you have obvious signs of impairment, merely detecting the presence of alcohol on your person isn't probable cause for a DUI arrest.

You can't be compelled to take a breath/blood test unless you are arrested(in most states I believe). People forget that they have the right to refuse a field sobriety test, you do not have to provide evidence against yourself. The major exception is if you are arrested. THEN you are either compelled to blood/breath or lose your license.

But if you don't take the field sobriety test then how is a probably cause arrest justified? If it isn't it doesn't matter if you blew over the limit at the station, no legal arrest means no legal evidence.
__________________
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t*rd by the clean end"
Posts: 8,013
CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 02:47 PM   #6
notorious notorious is offline
I Lay Wood for a Living
 
notorious's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Who knows?
Casino cash: $1169
Banyon has probably nailed a few of our local drunks to the wall.


It would be nice if he could weigh in on checkpoints.
Posts: 30,137
notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.notorious is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 02:55 PM   #7
vailpass vailpass is offline
Yah Mules!
 
vailpass's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2001
Casino cash: $99234074
DUI checkpoint, Human Smuggling checkpoint, or drug/Illegal produce checkpoint?
We have all 3 here in the lovely state of Arizona/CA border.
Posts: 36,463
vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.vailpass is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 03:07 PM   #8
chiefsnorth chiefsnorth is offline
Veteran
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Casino cash: $15815
I once had a police officer tell me that in Illinois you actually did not have a right to decline a search of a motor vehicle when you were operating that vehicle. No idea if that is correct or not. I suppose they could always make something up, like "I thought I smelled marijuana" anyway if they really wanted to snoop.
Posts: 1,808
chiefsnorth must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chiefsnorth must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chiefsnorth must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chiefsnorth must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chiefsnorth must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chiefsnorth must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chiefsnorth must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chiefsnorth must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chiefsnorth must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chiefsnorth must have mowed badgirl's lawn.chiefsnorth must have mowed badgirl's lawn.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 03:46 PM   #9
BIG_DADDY BIG_DADDY is offline
THE RED MENACE
 
BIG_DADDY's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: San Mateo, CA 94401
Casino cash: $63512
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefsnorth View Post
I once had a police officer tell me that in Illinois you actually did not have a right to decline a search of a motor vehicle when you were operating that vehicle. No idea if that is correct or not. I suppose they could always make something up, like "I thought I smelled marijuana" anyway if they really wanted to snoop.
Just words. If you don't give them permission to search they may search anyway but that can also make what they find inadmissible. Often times they will just take the contraband and let you go because they know it is a legal nightmare.
__________________
Posts: 29,620
BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 03:50 PM   #10
BIG_DADDY BIG_DADDY is offline
THE RED MENACE
 
BIG_DADDY's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: San Mateo, CA 94401
Casino cash: $63512
Quote:
Originally Posted by notorious View Post
Short and sweet.


Thanks.


We basically forfeit a very small amount of freedom for safety.
Those who would give up Essential Liberty
to purchase a little Temporary Safety,
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.


Benjamin Franklin
__________________
Posts: 29,620
BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.BIG_DADDY is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 04:14 PM   #11
ClevelandBronco ClevelandBronco is offline
Banned
 
ClevelandBronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Casino cash: $159300
Those who would confuse Essential Liberty with convenience
should tie kite strings around their dicks
in a lightning storm.
Posts: 20,135
ClevelandBronco has disabled reputation
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 04:30 PM   #12
KC native KC native is offline
a toda madre o un desmadre
 
KC native's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Casino cash: $1067589
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefsnorth View Post
I once had a police officer tell me that in Illinois you actually did not have a right to decline a search of a motor vehicle when you were operating that vehicle. No idea if that is correct or not. I suppose they could always make something up, like "I thought I smelled marijuana" anyway if they really wanted to snoop.
Completely incorrect but cops are allowed to lie to you to get you to confess things that you would otherwise not tell them.
__________________
The diameter of your knowledge is the circumference of your actions. Ras Kass

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowanian View Post
I'm just a little pussy from Iowa
Posts: 16,488
KC native Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.KC native Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.KC native Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.KC native Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.KC native Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.KC native Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.KC native Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.KC native Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.KC native Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.KC native Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.KC native Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 04:41 PM   #13
Stewie Stewie is offline
Supporter
 
Stewie's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West of the Equator
Casino cash: $809
DUI checkpoints (place and time) are made public days before they happen.
Posts: 10,684
Stewie wants to die in a aids tree fire.Stewie wants to die in a aids tree fire.Stewie wants to die in a aids tree fire.Stewie wants to die in a aids tree fire.Stewie wants to die in a aids tree fire.Stewie wants to die in a aids tree fire.Stewie wants to die in a aids tree fire.Stewie wants to die in a aids tree fire.Stewie wants to die in a aids tree fire.Stewie wants to die in a aids tree fire.Stewie wants to die in a aids tree fire.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 06:46 PM   #14
orange orange is offline
MVP
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Denver, CO
Casino cash: $70871
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyPhuD View Post
Well sure they probably aren't legal, but the other truth is that realistically no one should ever be convicted of a DUI as a result of them(unless obviously they are grossly drunk). Why? They can stop you but they can't force you to take a field sobriety test. In absence of a field sobriety test how can they convict you of a DUI at a checkpoint? There is no reasonable suspicion that you are drunk. You weren't pulled over for weaving and unless you have obvious signs of impairment, merely detecting the presence of alcohol on your person isn't probable cause for a DUI arrest.

You can't be compelled to take a breath/blood test unless you are arrested(in most states I believe). People forget that they have the right to refuse a field sobriety test, you do not have to provide evidence against yourself. The major exception is if you are arrested. THEN you are either compelled to blood/breath or lose your license.

But if you don't take the field sobriety test then how is a probably cause arrest justified? If it isn't it doesn't matter if you blew over the limit at the station, no legal arrest means no legal evidence.
Implied consent and driving while intoxicated
See also: Drunk driving (United States)

All U.S. states have driver licensing laws which state that a licensed driver has given his implied consent to a field sobriety test and/or a Breathalyzer or similar manner of determining blood alcohol concentration. These laws have generally been upheld by courts as a valid exercise of the states' police power, against challenges under the Fourth Amendment (as a reasonable search and seizure) and Fifth Amendment (as not violative of the right against self-incrimination). This is largely because in the United States, driving is considered a privilege rather than a right, and the state has a legitimate interest in keeping dangerously intoxicated drivers off the road, to prevent injury, property damage, and loss of life. In most states, however, the police must have reasonable grounds for administering a sobriety test.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implied_consent


Sure, that's only Wikipedia, but my advice is "Don't test it."
Posts: 11,661
orange Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.orange Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.orange Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.orange Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.orange Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.orange Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.orange Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.orange Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.orange Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.orange Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.orange Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2011, 09:26 PM   #15
CrazyPhuD CrazyPhuD is offline
Meow
 
CrazyPhuD's Avatar
 
Pandemic Version 2 Champion Simon Champion
Join Date: Jun 2005
Casino cash: $1615695
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange View Post
Implied consent and driving while intoxicated
See also: Drunk driving (United States)

All U.S. states have driver licensing laws which state that a licensed driver has given his implied consent to a field sobriety test and/or a Breathalyzer or similar manner of determining blood alcohol concentration. These laws have generally been upheld by courts as a valid exercise of the states' police power, against challenges under the Fourth Amendment (as a reasonable search and seizure) and Fifth Amendment (as not violative of the right against self-incrimination). This is largely because in the United States, driving is considered a privilege rather than a right, and the state has a legitimate interest in keeping dangerously intoxicated drivers off the road, to prevent injury, property damage, and loss of life. In most states, however, the police must have reasonable grounds for administering a sobriety test.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implied_consent


Sure, that's only Wikipedia, but my advice is "Don't test it."
Why not? You should always know the laws of your state and if you don't and get busted for it then it's your fault. For instance implied consent in CA does NOT apply to field sobriety tests and also in AZ it is 100% voluntary. I believe in oregon the law says that implied consent is valid for field sobriety tests. But I would have no problem refusing them. It's one thing to claim you sign away your rights if there is probable cause for the tests, it is quite another if the tests are done just because. Fortunately it's not something that I have to worry about because field sobriety tests here are 100% voluntary. Nor would I really worry about it in another state if I had a CA drivers license. But in most cases you have the right to ask the officer if you are required to consent to these tests. Now will the officer always tell you the truth? Of course not that's why it is your duty to understand the law.

For instance here is the CA statute for implied consent

Quote:
23612. (a) (1) (A) A person who drives a motor vehicle is deemed to have given his or her consent to chemical testing of his or her blood or breath for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content of his or her blood, if lawfully arrested for an offense allegedly committed in violation of Section 23140, 23152, or 23153. If a blood or breath test, or both, are unavailable, then paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) applies.

(B) A person who drives a motor vehicle is deemed to have given his or her consent to chemical testing of his or her blood or urine for the purpose of determining the drug content of his or her blood, if lawfully arrested for an offense allegedly committed in violation of Section 23140, 23152, or 23153.
In CA and in many states you must be arrest FIRST before implied consent comes in and really I have no major issue with that. But if they wish to force someone who may have done absolutely nothing wrong into a field sobriety test just because the officer's flashlight detects alcohol from something in the car then that's bullshit.

It is my belief that many states also require there to be probably cause before chemical tests(as indicated by the wiki link also), but there are some states that do appear to place field sobriety under implied consent, so it is the citizens responsibility to understand his or her state's laws.
__________________
"Political correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t*rd by the clean end"
Posts: 8,013
CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.CrazyPhuD threw an interception on a screen pass.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.