Elections Republican Erick Erickson wishes for "sweet meteor of death" instead of current field

Amnorix · 02-13-2012, 06:22 AM

I heard about this on Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me, the NPR show, so I decided to look it up. Pretty amusing. I think it reflects the views of many Republicans who don't like Obama, but really can't get excited about any of their choices.

http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/0...of-death-2012/

As I said back in December, I have no plans to endorse a candidate for President of the United States. I wrote, at the time, “I would prefer instead to tell you exactly what I think about each of the candidates, good or bad, and let the chips fall where they may.”

Since then, I have routinely been asked who I would endorse. Today, after a lot of reflection on this race, I can honestly say my position has not changed and I would honestly prefer Ace of Spades’ sweet meteor of death than any of the candidates left in the race. Only the sweet meteor of death seems capable of stopping both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. I can take the easy way out and not endorse because while I recognize politics necessitates compromise, I would have to compromise my intellectual honesty too much to choose any of the remaining candidates. Tonight, on my radio show, I put my weight behind the sweet meteor of death. You can listen to my reasons why here.

The Republican Party is putting itself in the hands of the economy. With Mitt Romney as the nominee, we will be forced to hope for a deteriorating economy because, while I will vote for him and think he is vastly better than Barack Obama, the fact is he has made no case for himself against Barack Obama except that he can do a better job on the economy. And let’s be clear — no Republican should hope or appear to be hoping for a deteriorating economy. It’s just that with no other justification for his election other than electability based on the ability to fix the economy, if the economy fixes itself, suddenly there is no justification for Mitt Romney’s electability.

My sincere and honest hope is that both Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich stay in the race as long as possible to deny MItt Romney enough delegates to secure the Republican nomination. I do not think either Santorum or Gingrich have much of a better shot against Barack Obama, but I do think they are at least running on bigger ideas than Mitt Romney — ideas that still translate and survive an improving economy.

For months I have said I am for “Not Romney.” It is not because I think either Gingrich or Santorum have a better shot at winning than Romney, but because I still hold out hope for a broker convention to save us from ourselves.
I may be a Republican, and at one time an elected Republican, but I have always needed more than just a letter of the alphabet next to someone’s name to get me excited. Newt Gingrich excites because he picks fights with all the people I think need to be fought, including Mitt Romney. God bless him for that. But I am under no illusion that makes him capable of beating Barack Obama without a deteriorating economy.

Rick Santorum excites me because, while I think he is a big government and compassionate conservative, he is willing to defend traditional mores in this country in a way few are. HIs bold stand for faith and tradition is honest and refreshing, but it also makes for a massive liability in a general election when he has so little to show voters on other fronts.

As for Romney, he does not excite me and has largely run his campaign making sure conservatives know he can get the nomination without them. That’s all well and good, but he certainly should not expect me or other conservatives to do anything for him in the general election other than, hopefully it won’t just be me, showing up to vote for him. That’s about all I plan to do for the man.

I’ll support the Republican nominee for President. I’ll defend him from meritless attacks and I will oppose Barack Obama. Any one of our candidates is better than Barack Obama. But God help us if any one of them is the nominee.

Until we reach the magic number 1144, which is the number of delegates needed to secure the Republican nomination, I hold out hope that someone or some meteor saves us from ourselves

Brainiac · 02-13-2012, 07:32 AM

What Erick Erickson fails to understand is that fixing the economy is the most important issue. That's why moderate Republicans support Romney. Fixing the economy is far more important than picking fights with debate moderators and other candidates. It's also far more important than outlawing gay marriage and birth control.

Erick Erickson isn't very bright.

I can at least respect the Ron Paul supporters, because even though I disagree with their proposed solutions, at least they are focused on the issues that are important. Anyone who supports Gingrich or Santorum for the reasons he listed are focusing on the wrong issues.

**patteeu** · 02-13-2012, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brainiac

What Erick Erickson fails to understand is that fixing the economy is the most important issue. That's why moderate Republicans support Romney. Fixing the economy is far more important than picking fights with debate moderators and other candidates. It's also far more important than outlawing gay marriage and birth control.

Erick Erickson isn't very bright.

I can at least respect the Ron Paul supporters, because even though I disagree with their proposed solutions, at least they are focused on the issues that are important. Anyone who supports Gingrich or Santorum for the reasons he listed are focusing on the wrong issues.

I agree with all of this.

It seems to me that Erick Erickson is more interested in promoting himself than he is in winning the election this fall. I've never been a big RedState fan although I've never really paid much attention to why.

mikey23545 · 02-13-2012, 09:20 AM

What the hell is an Erick Erickson? Some comic book Viking?

Taco John · 02-13-2012, 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545

What the hell is an Erick Erickson? Some comic book Viking?

He's the norse god of uninfluential echo chambers.

mikey23545 · 02-13-2012, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

He's the norse god of uninfluential echo chambers.

Amnorix · 02-13-2012, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu

I agree with all of this.

It seems to me that Erick Erickson is more interested in promoting himself than he is in winning the election this fall. I've never been a big RedState fan although I've never really paid much attention to why.

I've never heard of him or RedState, but having heard the amusing phrase on NPR, figured I'd post it here.

**dirk digler** · 02-13-2012, 09:43 AM

Erick Erickson is on CNN and runs Redstate

02-13-2012, 06:22 AM
Amnorix In BB I trust Join Date: May 2003 Location: Boston, Mass. Casino cash: $195980	Republican Erick Erickson wishes for "sweet meteor of death" instead of current field I heard about this on Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me, the NPR show, so I decided to look it up. Pretty amusing. I think it reflects the views of many Republicans who don't like Obama, but really can't get excited about any of their choices. http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/0...of-death-2012/ As I said back in December, I have no plans to endorse a candidate for President of the United States. I wrote, at the time, “I would prefer instead to tell you exactly what I think about each of the candidates, good or bad, and let the chips fall where they may.” Since then, I have routinely been asked who I would endorse. Today, after a lot of reflection on this race, I can honestly say my position has not changed and I would honestly prefer Ace of Spades’ sweet meteor of death than any of the candidates left in the race. Only the sweet meteor of death seems capable of stopping both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama. I can take the easy way out and not endorse because while I recognize politics necessitates compromise, I would have to compromise my intellectual honesty too much to choose any of the remaining candidates. Tonight, on my radio show, I put my weight behind the sweet meteor of death. You can listen to my reasons why here. The Republican Party is putting itself in the hands of the economy. With Mitt Romney as the nominee, we will be forced to hope for a deteriorating economy because, while I will vote for him and think he is vastly better than Barack Obama, the fact is he has made no case for himself against Barack Obama except that he can do a better job on the economy. And let’s be clear — no Republican should hope or appear to be hoping for a deteriorating economy. It’s just that with no other justification for his election other than electability based on the ability to fix the economy, if the economy fixes itself, suddenly there is no justification for Mitt Romney’s electability. My sincere and honest hope is that both Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich stay in the race as long as possible to deny MItt Romney enough delegates to secure the Republican nomination. I do not think either Santorum or Gingrich have much of a better shot against Barack Obama, but I do think they are at least running on bigger ideas than Mitt Romney — ideas that still translate and survive an improving economy. For months I have said I am for “Not Romney.” It is not because I think either Gingrich or Santorum have a better shot at winning than Romney, but because I still hold out hope for a broker convention to save us from ourselves. I may be a Republican, and at one time an elected Republican, but I have always needed more than just a letter of the alphabet next to someone’s name to get me excited. Newt Gingrich excites because he picks fights with all the people I think need to be fought, including Mitt Romney. God bless him for that. But I am under no illusion that makes him capable of beating Barack Obama without a deteriorating economy. Rick Santorum excites me because, while I think he is a big government and compassionate conservative, he is willing to defend traditional mores in this country in a way few are. HIs bold stand for faith and tradition is honest and refreshing, but it also makes for a massive liability in a general election when he has so little to show voters on other fronts. As for Romney, he does not excite me and has largely run his campaign making sure conservatives know he can get the nomination without them. That’s all well and good, but he certainly should not expect me or other conservatives to do anything for him in the general election other than, hopefully it won’t just be me, showing up to vote for him. That’s about all I plan to do for the man. I’ll support the Republican nominee for President. I’ll defend him from meritless attacks and I will oppose Barack Obama. Any one of our candidates is better than Barack Obama. But God help us if any one of them is the nominee. Until we reach the magic number 1144, which is the number of delegates needed to secure the Republican nomination, I hold out hope that someone or some meteor saves us from ourselves
Posts: 31,091

02-13-2012, 07:32 AM	#2
Brainiac Veteran Join Date: Mar 2010 Casino cash: $39601	What Erick Erickson fails to understand is that fixing the economy is the most important issue. That's why moderate Republicans support Romney. Fixing the economy is far more important than picking fights with debate moderators and other candidates. It's also far more important than outlawing gay marriage and birth control. Erick Erickson isn't very bright. I can at least respect the Ron Paul supporters, because even though I disagree with their proposed solutions, at least they are focused on the issues that are important. Anyone who supports Gingrich or Santorum for the reasons he listed are focusing on the wrong issues.
Posts: 2,867

02-13-2012, 09:20 AM	#4
mikey23545 MVP Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $149683	What the hell is an Erick Erickson? Some comic book Viking?
Posts: 10,365

02-13-2012, 09:43 AM	#8
dirk digler Please squeeze Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Clinton, MO Casino cash: $160396	Erick Erickson is on CNN and runs Redstate
Posts: 45,056

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode