Why people laugh at Creationists

[Dave Lane]

Taking a lead from Killer Clown I thought I'd create a alternative thread to post some videos I like...

[EDIT New video here]

So on with the show:

Here's the Kent Hovind Theory:



"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it.
Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many.
Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books.
Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders.
Do not believe in traditions simply because they have been handed down for many generations.
But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it."

[Dave]

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

Not really, I'm presenting my pov and people attack it.

Victim

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by Dave

Victim

Heh, not at all. I'm pointing out future victims if they stay the course.

[Cephalic Trauma]

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

More like I don't feel the need to argue, it doesn't make or break me. You can run around calling those that find fault with man stupid if it makes you feel better.

Nobody's arguing with you, per se. They are arguing with your primitive belief that is all too pervasive in a world that has so many tools to become enlightened. You, and others who think like you, choose to stay in the dark because it's comfortable.

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by Cephalic Trauma

Nobody's arguing with you, per se. They are arguing with your primitive belief that is all too pervasive in a world that has so many tools to become enlightened. You, and others who think like you, choose to stay in the dark because it's comfortable.

Actually I'm in the light and those that do not see the light stand in darkness.

[Cephalic Trauma]

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

Actually I'm in the light and those that do not see the light stand in darkness.

Translation: "My view is right, yours is wrong. End of story."

Primitive.

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by Cephalic Trauma

Translation: "My view is right, yours is wrong. End of story."

Truth.

fyp, like I said no need for me to argue.

[Fish]

Originally Posted by KILLER_CLOWN

Actually I'm in the light and those that do not see the light stand in darkness.

A Scientologist could say the same thing and you two would be on equal footing... Keep that in mind...

[King_Chief_Fan]

Originally Posted by Dave Lane

Just show me some evidence. I mean any real certifiable evidence that ANY of your positions are true and then we can talk. Until then you are a 14 year old that believes in Santa. Study up understand what 99.9% of scientists say and believe and then we can talk ,until then stay at the childs table.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJioWKPlBIw

here is something that has been proven by scientist

Let me know what you think....and I want proof that this is wrong
and if it is other science contradicting then there is a problem in the world of science......you might want to join us 14 year olds

[KILLER_CLOWN]

Originally Posted by Fish

A Scientologist could say the same thing and you two would be on equal footing... Keep that in mind...

In your eyes I understand that, also of note I don't have a problem with scientologists they can believe what they wish as long as they aren't hurting anyone.

[Brock]

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJioWKPlBIw

here is something that has been proven by scientist

Let me know what you think....and I want proof that this is wrong
and if it is other science contradicting then there is a problem in the world of science......you might want to join us 14 year olds

wow.

[mlyonsd]

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJioWKPlBIw

here is something that has been proven by scientist

Let me know what you think....and I want proof that this is wrong
and if it is other science contradicting then there is a problem in the world of science......you might want to join us 14 year olds

I'm glad I wasn't smoked up when I watched that. Not that I could have kept up with it if I was.

[Fish]

Originally Posted by King_Chief_Fan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJioWKPlBIw

here is something that has been proven by scientist

Let me know what you think....and I want proof that this is wrong
and if it is other science contradicting then there is a problem in the world of science......you might want to join us 14 year olds

I'm sorry, but if you think that constitutes as scientific proof, then I don't think there is anything that can be said. To use the unified theory as scientific evidence of the existence of God? Well, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Not to mention the 5 dozen straw man arguments in a row.

It starts out saying there are 4 attributes that would describe what a God would be. Then it says all we have to do to prove God exists, is to find something in the universe that also satisfies those 4 attributes. But that's not proving God. That's proving something in the universe has what we think are godlike properties. And then it completely falls all over itself trying to prove that the unified theory fills those 4 requirements. But it doesn't, and was not meant to.

That's just using little bits and pieces of actual scientific knowledge, and warping it and simplifying it to fit a godlike description. That's not proof at all. There's a reason that video has user comments disabled....

Also, there is certainly other science contradicting it. And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. That's the way it should be. Science doesn't work with one person declaring a statement, and it just being accepted. Everything in science is questioned countless times. Contradicting info doesn't mean there's anything wrong with science. It means there's something wrong with the idea.

[go bowe]

Originally Posted by RNR

Dear creator
I was hoping you could clear something up for me. There are several people who claim to have books written by you, or at least books that you inspired the writers to record your words. The problem is there are countless versions of who you are and what you wanted to tell us. So I thought maybe you would be interested in a book signing tour. That way we could settle this once and for all.

Thanks in advance~

great idea!

think of the publicity for the big guy in the sky...

killer would be orgasmic...

and all of us science believers would be proven wrong...

think of the unbridled joy we could experience being freed of our earthly conceits...

i can't wait...

[go bowe]

Originally Posted by Fish

I'm sorry, but if you think that constitutes as scientific proof, then I don't think there is anything that can be said. To use the unified theory as scientific evidence of the existence of God? Well, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Not to mention the 5 dozen straw man arguments in a row.

It starts out saying there are 4 attributes that would describe what a God would be. Then it says all we have to do to prove God exists, is to find something in the universe that also satisfies those 4 attributes. But that's not proving God. That's proving something in the universe has what we think are godlike properties. And then it completely falls all over itself trying to prove that the unified theory fills those 4 requirements. But it doesn't, and was not meant to.

That's just using little bits and pieces of actual scientific knowledge, and warping it and simplifying it to fit a godlike description. That's not proof at all. There's a reason that video has user comments disabled....

Also, there is certainly other science contradicting it. And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. That's the way it should be. Science doesn't work with one person declaring a statement, and it just being accepted. Everything in science is questioned countless times. Contradicting info doesn't mean there's anything wrong with science. It means there's something wrong with the idea.

perfectly put, well said, and tally-****ing-ho...

never heard it put quite that way but it seems so obvious once you said it...

[RNR]

Originally Posted by Fish

I'm sorry, but if you think that constitutes as scientific proof, then I don't think there is anything that can be said. To use the unified theory as scientific evidence of the existence of God? Well, that doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Not to mention the 5 dozen straw man arguments in a row.

It starts out saying there are 4 attributes that would describe what a God would be. Then it says all we have to do to prove God exists, is to find something in the universe that also satisfies those 4 attributes. But that's not proving God. That's proving something in the universe has what we think are godlike properties. And then it completely falls all over itself trying to prove that the unified theory fills those 4 requirements. But it doesn't, and was not meant to.

That's just using little bits and pieces of actual scientific knowledge, and warping it and simplifying it to fit a godlike description. That's not proof at all. There's a reason that video has user comments disabled....

Also, there is certainly other science contradicting it. And there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. That's the way it should be. Science doesn't work with one person declaring a statement, and it just being accepted. Everything in science is questioned countless times. Contradicting info doesn't mean there's anything wrong with science. It means there's something wrong with the idea.

The silly YouTube nonsense he posted aside trying to argue with these people is pointless. Religion has battled against science since the beginning. Slowly as their fangs and claws were removed and they can no longer force their will on people. Now with evidence they cannot dismiss they do one of two things, ignore it or say wow god is even cooler than we thought~