3 illegals charged with voter fraud

[Comrade Crapski]

It's only 3, but it's a start...

3 Council Bluffs Noncitizens Charged with Voter Fraud

By Rod Boshart, Reporter

DES MOINES, Iowa – Three people were charged with felony counts of voter fraud in Pottawattamie County Thursday as a result of an Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation probe initiated last month in conjunction with the Iowa Secretary of State’s Office.

Class D first-degree election misconduct charges were brought against Albert Harte-Maxwell, 52; Linda Harte-Maxwell, 49; and Maria Ayon-Fernandez, 40, all of Council Bluffs. All three individuals were booked into the Pottawattamie County Jail on Thursday and released on their own recognizance, according to a DCI statement. The investigation was conducted by the DCI and Pottawattamie County Attorney’s Office.

According to criminal complaints filed in the case, Albert Harte-Maxwell, Linda Harte-Maxwell, and Maria Ayon-Fernandez are all non-U.S. citizens who registered to vote in Pottawattamie County. Albert Harte-Maxwell voted in the 2010 general election and 2011 city election; Linda Harte-Maxwell voted in the 2011 city election; and Maria Ayon-Fernandez voted in the 2010 general election, according to the complaint and affidavit. The Harte-Maxwells are citizens of Canada and Ayon-Fernandez is a citizen of Mexico, court records indicate.

Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz, who also serves as the state’s commissioner of election, praised the work of investigators for uncovering the election crimes allegedly perpetrated by three foreign nationals who are accused of participating in Iowa elections even though they are not U.S. citizens.

http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/3-Cou...170572526.html

[LiveSteam]

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

You can post links to all these accusations of voter fraud. The voter ID laws are suppose to correct in person voter fraud.

You guys can get all worked up. Spit fire and venom. In person voting fraud is just not wide spread as Fox News and the bubble are telling you. That is just fact. We are talking about a possible fraud on what % of ballots cast in person, 0.0000000001%?

Any percent is 1 % to many. JFC what part of that dont you get?

[BigRedChief]

Originally Posted by LiveSteam

Any percent is 1 % to many. JFC what part of that dont you get?

I get that .00000000001% is still too much. Its the over reaction to that .0000000001% that concerns me.

[HonestChieffan]

Grand Jury in Chicago would say quite different. But then, you dont care to deal in facts

[RINGLEADER]

We're becoming a banana republic...

[Titty Meat]

Speaking of voter fraud I didn't see any non-Paul Republicans bitching when some of his delegates gout thrown out.

[Otter]

Has anyone been accused of racism yet? because you only need to follow the rules if you're a produtive member of society otherwise you're a victim. I marvel in the 'wow' sometimes.

[BigRedChief]

Originally Posted by Otter

Has anyone been accused of racism yet?

Whats going on here with photo ID laws is not racism, its politics.

[LiveSteam]

[QUOTE=Otter;9035635]Has anyone been accused of racism yet?
Not me never.

[nstygma]

In the beginning of this country, only land owners had the right to vote. Why did the founders start with that?

[LiveSteam]

Originally Posted by nstygma

In the beginning of this country, only land owners had the right to vote. Why did the founders start with that?

God

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by banyon

So these 3 people are the justification for disenfranchising millions through the new voter id laws?
How did requiring id help at all? Looks like they were able to figure it out without ids?

Zero people are disenfranchised by requiring identification to vote.

[Comrade Crapski]

More communist/democrat crime:



There are obviously verifiable vote fraud problems in North Carolina.

In 2010 those problems surfaced meaningfully as indicated in the below voter fraud post from an earlier Charlotte Conservative Examiner article:

“
Perhaps in an effort to promote North Carolina as one of the healthiest States in the Nation, this latest voter twist comes to us from Susan Myrick of the Civitas Institute in North Carolina--not to be confused with Rep. Sue Myrick of NC who is unrelated. In a radio interview with local WBT Anchor Tara Servatious, Susan reports that she has been keeping track of the number of votes in North Carolina of individuals over the age of 110 years and apparently we have quite a few, over 410 of the 110 year olds--to be exact-- actually voted via absentee ballot on October the 28th. Yes indeed, now it would appear that good ole NC has the market cornered on the Centenarian vote.

“
At latest count, Susan has garnered a total Absentee Ballot vote of over 2,660 people over the age of 110. Someone contact the Guiness Book and warm up the Ford, the Fountain of Youth exists and its right here in lovely NC. It's no wonder people are moving here in droves--maybe the use of tobacco isn't such a bad thing after all? But, on a more serious note, with all of the irregularities going on all over the place, we can now begin to wonder about a few things.

Apparently those ultra-healthy seniors over 110 have aged and are now astoundingly over 112 years old, and are still able to make it to the polls ahead of time.

According to a post originally from the Silence Dogood political blog report, there were at least 758 individuals over the age of 112 who had either risen from their respective graves, or otherwise, to vote once again for the Democrats in charge, who might apparently have also guaranteed them an ever-lasting vote for life and beyond.

In visiting the political tracking site, we later found the same story in evidence, except the number of centenarian voters had increased measurably to 832 voters over the age of 112. Of these voters, over 70% were slated as Democrats, with a diminutive 25% counted as Republicans. The rest were unaffiliated.

When peering a little more deeply at the numbers we find that an astounding 2,374 people between the ages of 94 and 100 have already voted in the NC election to date. While an even more astounding 832 votes came from those individuals aged 112. However, according to the Guinness book of world records, the oldest living person in the world, at present, lives in Japan and is 114 years old. It would seem obvious that, according to the NC vote registry, this old fellow might be nudged aside in the near future, especially considering the crop of spry 112 year-olds seemingly alive and well in the old North State.

In fact, two of the 112 year aged voters were mail-in ballots from overseas; ostensibly vacationing to escape the now bitterly polarized political contest, and who can blame them?

But it gets worse when we note from another concerned voter, who indicated the following explanation, which goes but one full measure further to explain what's happening in NC during this voting season of , perhaps, persistent political zombies:

“
I overheard a nice lady about 70 telling her friend the following: "Yes, I voted today."

"Going back tomorrow too."

"They took us to a place that don't ask names and don't write nothing down. They give $20 each time."

She then handed her friend a card I couldn't see and told her friend to call the number.

This same tipster later sent a message indicating that he had, indeed, contacted the local election center, who immediately patted him upon the head graciously for being a good citizen with a promise to check on it again much later, in due course.

Obviously there is a problem, one in which voter ID might clearly provide a solution. A thing that only the Democratic party swears against at any cost, and for reasons becoming quite obvious.
..

http://www.examiner.com/article/nort...the-age-of-112

[banyon]

Originally Posted by patteeu

Zero people are disenfranchised by requiring identification to vote.

Yes they are. There are countless examples of elderly people who don't have to ability to travel a couple of states away and get their original birth certificates, etc. It's not so much the "having the ID" that's the problem. It's the "prove you're a citizen" component of the laws that throws up the hurdles.

In fact, several courts of appeal have affirmatively decided that there is inadequate infrastructure in place to provide the required ID's and are ordering the process halted.

[InChiefsHell]

Originally Posted by banyon

Yes they are. There are countless examples of elderly people who don't have to ability to travel a couple of states away and get their original birth certificates, etc. It's not so much the "having the ID" that's the problem. It's the "prove you're a citizen" component of the laws that throws up the hurdles.

In fact, several courts of appeal have affirmatively decided that there is inadequate infrastructure in place to provide the required ID's and are ordering the process halted.

How the hell do these people obtain a mortgage, cash a check, use a credit card...without some kind of ID? And you can send away for your birth cert...you don't have to travel a couple of states away...

[headsnap]

Originally Posted by patteeu

Many people are disenfranchised by requiring identification to vote again.

fyp