Obama election staffers have no problem with vote early and vote often.

[jjjayb]

[jjjayb]

Originally Posted by Literature

Flesh this out for me. You've got your registration form in front of you. You fill out John Smith, even though your name isn't John Smith. What's your next step?

Send it in, along with proof of residence. A utility bill would be an acceptable form of proof of residence.

[La literatura]

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy

Well, here is what google popped up in a simple search:

I only read the first couple of paragraphs for each one, but they seemed pretty self explanatory:


http://www.wnd.com/2011/09/344577/

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124182750646102435.html

http://dailycaller.com/2010/06/10/ac...new-documents/


Are you trying to say ACORN was innocent of the charges levied against it? Charges that a judge reviewed and heard evidence for in Nevada? Charges that ACORN officials were convicted of?

Read those articles, and then we can talk about the charges.

[jjjayb]

Originally Posted by Literature

I've discovered in life that a lot of people like to pretend they know what they're talking about, even though they've never spent a minute of their time actually searching for the truth of it. It's okay to some degree. There's a lot of information to process in the world. We can't be experts in everything. But it's hard to excuse a person who doesn't know but acts like he knows.

Look in the mirror much?

[KC Dan]

Originally Posted by jjjayb

Look in your mom's mirror much?

fyp

[La literatura]

Originally Posted by jjjayb

Look in the mirror much?

Multiple times a day.

[jjjayb]

Originally Posted by Literature

Multiple times a day.

Sorry for you.

By the way. One of these Obama staffers was fired today. Amazing to me how many of them thought absolutely NOTHING of voting twice. I wonder how much that happens in the Kansas City area. I'm probably still registered to vote in Missouri, as well as my current registration in Kansas.

[mnchiefsguy]

Originally Posted by Literature

You know why you're a douchebag? Because I ask you one question, and you imply that I'm in denial. You're a weasel. I never said anything hinting on the guilt or innocence of ACORN in any charge, you piece of shit.

How would you appreciate if I said things like, "Are you trying to say that black people don't deserve to vote?" when I ask you about the voter ID requirements? You'd probably be frustrated because it's dishonest to imply.

Says the guy who implies that anyone who supports the "undue burden" of having an ID at the polls is doing so because of politics, and not out of a desire to keep our elections clean.

Says the guy who implied that RR did not support the rights of the poor or minorities to vote, as you did earlier in this thread.

Get off of your high horse.

[La literatura]

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy

Says the guy who implies that anyone who supports the "undue burden" of having an ID at the polls is doing so because of politics, and not out of a desire to keep our elections clean.

Says the guy who implied that RR did not support the rights of the poor or minorities to vote, as you did earlier in this thread.

Get off of your high horse.

Now I can tell that you're done arguing, and you've turned to lying. Until you clean up the act, I think we're through here.

[mnchiefsguy]

Originally Posted by jjjayb

Sorry for you.

By the way. One of these Obama staffers was fired today. Amazing to me how many of them thought absolutely NOTHING of voting twice. I wonder how much that happens in the Kansas City area. I'm probably still registered to vote in Missouri, as well as my current registration in Kansas.

The multiple registrations actually brings up a very fixable problem. There should be some kind of national database for registered voters...so that when one person registers in Kansas, let's say, and supplies their s.s. #, etc., then that info can be entered into the database, and any other state that person was registered in could then remove that person from there voter roles. Not sure how complicated, or how expensive, such a system would be, but it would be worth looking into.

[mnchiefsguy]

Originally Posted by Literature

Of course you wish they didn't vote. That's not the issue. The issue is whether people who you think suck at life have a right to vote. This country was founded upon the idea that people have an inherent right to choose who governs them. And people died to protect that right.

There used to be a principle of "I might not agree with what you said, but I'll defend your right to say it." Your principle seems to be, "I don't like what you're saying, so I'll just turn a blind eye when the government places undue burdens upon that."

Don't you have a son in the armed forces? What do you think he fights for? Presumably, American freedoms like voting, not drinking or adopting a pet.

Did you, or did you not, post that?

Did you, or did you not, follow that post up with this bit of sarcasm:

Great! You definitely seem to be a huge pillar of support for people's right to vote. Keep up the terrific work!

Sure looks like you implied RR did not support the right of minorities to vote to me.

Look in the mirror, you will see a liar staring back at you.

[La literatura]

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy

Did you, or did you not, post that?

Did you, or did you not, follow that post up with this bit of sarcasm:



Sure looks like you implied RR did not support the right of minorities to vote to me.

Look in the mirror, you will see a liar staring back at you.

Okay, you're not lying. You're just stupid. No, that doesn't imply that RR doesn't support the right of minorities to vote. It implies that RR doesn't care much about vocally supporting the right of minorities to vote. That might be a little too nuanced for you to process, but I'm not going to spend much time going over why they're different.

[mnchiefsguy]

Originally Posted by Literature

Okay, you're not lying. You're just stupid. No, that doesn't imply that RR doesn't support the right of minorities to vote. It implies that RR doesn't care much about vocally supporting the right of minorities to vote. That might be a little too nuanced for you to process, but I'm not going to spend much time going over why they're different.

In other words, you try to avoid admitting your lie by parsing words and splitting hairs....got it.

[La literatura]

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy

In other words, you try to avoid admitting your lie by parsing words and splitting hairs....got it.

Words: they matter and they don't all mean the same thing. The more you know . . .

[mnchiefsguy]

Originally Posted by Literature

Words: they matter and they don't all mean the same thing. The more you know . . .

Well, apparently RR thought you were saying the same thing, since he posted this:

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider

Read my post again Jensen. I said I support their rights~

So perhaps you should choose your words more carefully, after all, words do matter.

[La literatura]

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy

Well, apparently RR thought you were saying the same thing, since he posted this:




So perhaps you should choose your words more carefully, after all, words do matter.

Yes, RR re-emphasized that he supports the right to vote. I can still reply sarcastically to him about his support without implying that he doesn't support the right of minorities to vote. I hate to be rude, but I can't walk you through 12 years of elementary school right now.