MSNBC's Undecided Voter Panel Swayed by Romney

[petegz28]

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...ey_654728.html

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

Adding anything? Sure.



Alrighty then.

So what would you prefer to see from my posting in this forum?

I assume heckling pete's bullshit is off the table for you.

tl;dr

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by Saul Too

tl;dr

That's about what I got from you last time I asked.

[DaveNull]

There are bigger unanswered questions about folks that are undecided at this point than who they'll vote for.

I picture them all driving el camino like cars, living in split level houses and drinking coke light.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Didn't watch the video, but how was the panel swayed by Romney?

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

That's about what I got from you last time I asked.

I don't care what you post. You don't need to take requests from me. I'd just prefer that you not spam the board.

Pete posts articles linked from Drudge. We get it.

You have a problem with that. We get it.

There really isn't any need for you to go all "Clay in a McCluster thread".

Do it if you want. Just don't expect to be taken seriously.

[DaveNull]

Didn't watch the video, but how was the panel swayed by Romney?

They couldn't really point to one thing over another.

[RNR]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Didn't watch the video, but how was the panel swayed by Romney?

Because he is anyone besides the embarrassment we have in office now. Nobody less the blind followers of the right wing party bullshit sees him as anything else~

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider

Because he is anyone besides the embarrassment we have in office now. Nobody less the blind followers of the right wing party bullshit sees him as anything else~

I meant, how many panelists did he sway? The title makes it sound like the entire panel was swayed, or at least a majority. I find that difficult to believe.

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by Saul Too

I don't care what you post. You don't need to take requests from me. I'd just prefer that you not spam the board.

Pete posts articles linked from Drudge. We get it.

You have a problem with that. We get it.

There really isn't any need for you to go all "Clay in a McCluster thread".

Do it if you want. Just don't expect to be taken seriously.

You're perfectly content, or at least don't bitch about, any of the guys "spamming" the board who happen to be on your side of the aisle.

It's not my methodology you abhor, it's my ideology.

Which, honestly, is hard for me to care about.

[RNR]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

I meant, how many panelists did he sway? The title makes it sound like the entire panel was swayed, or at least a majority. I find that difficult to believe.

Sorry, I watched the debate but have paid little attention to the aftermath. I would be shocked if it was a huge swing. What was your take on the debate? I thought Romney slaughtered him the first time. Obama was much better this round and held his own~

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

You're perfectly content, or at least don't bitch about, any of the guys "spamming" the board who happen to be on your side of the aisle.

It's not my methodology you abhor, it's my ideology.

Which, honestly, is hard for me to care about.

I'm not content with it. I just don't read their shit. If I skip all of their wordy posts, I don't feel like I'm missing much. If I skip all of your wordy posts, I might.

There are plenty of posters on "my side" that make me roll my eyes when I see that they have posted, and I tend to gloss over their posts or ignore the threads entirely. I don't bitch about it because I don't care.

[jjjayb]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

What did you think of orange constantly copying and pasting from HuffPo?

Exhausting, was it not?

Now -- imagine that's where he got all his news from.

My entire thing is that Pete has immersed himself in rightwing media, predominantly Drudge. And this has had two consequences:

• He has become a rightwing demagogue as a result.
• He's become really misinformed as a result.

Take this article, for instance, which a GOP-sponsored outlet, linked by the GOP-sponsored Drudge, claims that a singular MSNBC panel was swayed.

When in reality:



So long as Pete is going to blindly swallow the bullshit the conservative media feeds him, I'm going to expose him as the puppet he is.

So you think the articles you post aren't also linked at left leaning sites?

[RINGLEADER]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Didn't watch the video, but how was the panel swayed by Romney?

They were generally complimentary of Romney and felt like he had a decent plan to turn things around, but only 2 committed...

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by Saul Too

I'm not content with it. I just don't read their shit. If I skip all of their wordy posts, I don't feel like I'm missing much. If I skip all of your wordy posts, I might.

There are plenty of posters on "my side" that make me roll my eyes when I see that they have posted, and I tend to gloss over their posts or ignore the threads entirely. I don't bitch about it because I don't care.

Exactly, you don't bitch about it because you don't care.

But when liberal Direckshun's at it... you somehow find the energy to care.

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by jjjayb

So you think the articles you post aren't also linked at left leaning sites?

Two things:

1. Drudge is not a right leaning site. The Wall Street Journal is right leaning. Wilkinson is right leaning. David Frum is right leaning.

It is a Republican propaganda outlet. Hannity-endorsed. It is a different beast altogether.

2. Pete gets all his news from Drudge. This is not new information. I on the other hand stick with reputable news resources. I read plenty of liberal blogs, just like I take in a ton of conservative media as well, and often times much of the stuff I post ends up there. Which affects my point about Pete's reliance on Drudge... how?