MSNBC's Undecided Voter Panel Swayed by Romney

[petegz28]

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...ey_654728.html

[ROYC75]

That went well for MSNBC.

[The Rick]

They were obviously plants.

[Direckshun]

[RINGLEADER]

Originally Posted by petegz28

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...ey_654728.html

I watched the video -- out of eight people 1 said they were for Obama and 1 said they were for Romney. I think Romney has done a good job of not seeming "unacceptable," which is probably a blow to the president's strategy, and getting anyone to say nice things about Romney on MSNBC is quite a feat, but it was split 50/50. Just like the other polls I've seen that asked if the second debate made you more likely to go one way or the other...

[jjjayb]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

Wow. Do you do ANYTHING here besides 1. Hit and run with cut and paste articles and 2. Deflect the content of stories you don't like by griping about what websites they are reported on?

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by jjjayb

Wow. Do you do ANYTHING here besides 1. Hit and run with cut and paste articles and 2. Deflect the content of stories you don't like by griping about what websites they are reported on?

Little does Wee-Wee, A.K.A., Direckshun, know that I didn't get this off of Drudge. I heard about it on the radio on the way to work and went to the Weekly Standard directly.

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by jjjayb

Wow. Do you do ANYTHING here besides 1. Hit and run with cut and paste articles and 2. Deflect the content of stories you don't like by griping about what websites they are reported on?

What did you think of orange constantly copying and pasting from HuffPo?

Exhausting, was it not?

Now -- imagine that's where he got all his news from.

My entire thing is that Pete has immersed himself in rightwing media, predominantly Drudge. And this has had two consequences:

• He has become a rightwing demagogue as a result.
• He's become really misinformed as a result.

Take this article, for instance, which a GOP-sponsored outlet, linked by the GOP-sponsored Drudge, claims that a singular MSNBC panel was swayed.

When in reality:

Originally Posted by RINGLEADER

I watched the video -- out of eight people 1 said they were for Obama and 1 said they were for Romney.

So long as Pete is going to blindly swallow the bullshit the conservative media feeds him, I'm going to expose him as the puppet he is.

[qabbaan]

Crying about where a link came from in a clear attempt to distract from discussion of the content is the lowest form of pantywaste debate you could codify here

[BucEyedPea]

I hope so but it's hard to rely on the Weekly Slandered—the premier magazine of Trotskyite Bill Kristol.

[qabbaan]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

So long as Pete is going to blindly swallow the bullshit the conservative media feeds him, I'm going to expose him as the puppet he is.

You're going to educate us on who is a shill around here eh

[Saul Good]

Originally Posted by Direckshun

What did you think of orange constantly copying and pasting from HuffPo?

Exhausting, was it not?

Now -- imagine that's where he got all his news from.

My entire thing is that Pete has immersed himself in rightwing media, predominantly Drudge. And this has had two consequences:

• He has become a rightwing demagogue as a result.
• He's become really misinformed as a result.

Take this article, for instance, which a GOP-sponsored outlet, linked by the GOP-sponsored Drudge, claims that a singular MSNBC panel was swayed.

When in reality:



So long as Pete is going to blindly swallow the bullshit the conservative media feeds him, I'm going to expose him as the puppet he is.

Do you feel like you're adding anything with those posts? It just makes me take you less seriously and less likely to give you the benefit of the doubt when you post something that will take some effort to sift through.

I'll read through a long post/article from a poster who has consistently worthwhile takes. Nobody falls in and out of that category more than you.

[BucEyedPea]

Originally Posted by qabbaan

Crying about where a link came from in a clear attempt to distract from discussion of the content is the lowest form of pantywaste debate you could codify here

You've done it. Oh, btw, it's pantywaist.

[qabbaan]

Originally Posted by BucEyedPea

You've done it. Oh, btw, it's pantywaist.

No, the term is a comparison to stains and biological residue.

[Direckshun]

Originally Posted by Saul Too

Do you feel like you're adding anything with those posts?

Adding anything? Sure.

Originally Posted by Saul Too

It just makes me take you less seriously and less likely to give you the benefit of the doubt when you post something that will take some effort to sift through.

I'll read through a long post/article from a poster who has consistently worthwhile takes. Nobody falls in and out of that category more than you.

Alrighty then.

So what would you prefer to see from my posting in this forum?

I assume heckling pete's bullshit is off the table for you.