Home Mail MemberMap Chat (0) Wallpapers
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > The Lounge > D.C.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-16-2012, 11:35 PM  
Direckshun Direckshun is offline
Black for Palestine
 
Direckshun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
Casino cash: $23954
Let's research gun violence.

I've said this in a couple other threads, but I don't believe that gun control is going to get any traction in Congress. Some Democrats will push for it, some other Republicans will table it, some pro-gun control folks like myself will cry foul, and yet another Congress will pass without any gun control measures seeing the light of day.

But here's one thing that maybe we can start doing: better educate ourselves on gun violence, so we can stop stabbing in the dark as to what we can better do to mitigate it.

The problem is that for a couple decades now, the government has not been able to produce any information on gun violence because the NRA has been threatening war if Congress failed to choke off all funding for gun-related research.

The CDC and NIH used to conduct research for decades, but around the time of the late 90s, the NRA became so powerful it was able to prevent these agencies from granting funds to researchers on those topics. McClatchy DC:

Quote:
The CDC and NIH award billions in grants. They fund research into cancer, brain injury, tobacco use, obesity, AIDS, abortion, hearing loss, allergies, infectious diseases, back pain and virtually everything else related to human health. But gun violence is the one area that carries that specific language. The effect has been to limit federal funding into research that could be used to shape policy.
This is irresponsible. We pass hundreds of gun-related laws across the country every few years. Like all laws, we should be able to research the impact of the laws we pass, so we can make decisions based on more than pure ideology.

Anyway, there's a ton of stories on this, but here's a really good one from last year in the Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/26/us...anted=all&_r=0

N.R.A. Stymies Firearms Research, Scientists Say
By MICHAEL LUO
Published: January 25, 2011

In the wake of the shootings in Tucson, the familiar questions inevitably resurfaced: Are communities where more people carry guns safer or less safe? Does the availability of high-capacity magazines increase deaths? Do more rigorous background checks make a difference?

The reality is that even these and other basic questions cannot be fully answered, because not enough research has been done. And there is a reason for that. Scientists in the field and former officials with the government agency that used to finance the great bulk of this research say the influence of the National Rife Association has all but choked off money for such work.

“We’ve been stopped from answering the basic questions,” said Mark Rosenberg, former director of the National Center for Injury Control and Prevention, part of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which was for about a decade the leading source of financing for firearms research.

Chris Cox, the N.R.A.’s chief lobbyist, said his group had not tried to squelch genuine scientific inquiries, just politically slanted ones.

“Our concern is not with legitimate medical science,” Mr. Cox said. “Our concern is they were promoting the idea that gun ownership was a disease that needed to be eradicated.”

The amount of money available today for studying the impact of firearms is a fraction of what it was in the mid-1990s, and the number of scientists toiling in the field has dwindled to just a handful as a result, researchers say.

The dearth of money can be traced in large measure to a clash between public health scientists and the N.R.A. in the mid-1990s. At the time, Dr. Rosenberg and others at the C.D.C. were becoming increasingly assertive about the importance of studying gun-related injuries and deaths as a public health phenomenon, financing studies that found, for example, having a gun in the house, rather than conferring protection, significantly increased the risk of homicide by a family member or intimate acquaintance.

Alarmed, the N.R.A. and its allies on Capitol Hill fought back. The injury center was guilty of “putting out papers that were really political opinion masquerading as medical science,” said Mr. Cox, who also worked on this issue for the N.R.A. more than a decade ago.

Initially, pro-gun lawmakers sought to eliminate the injury center completely, arguing that its work was “redundant” and reflected a political agenda. When that failed, they turned to the appropriations process. In 1996, Representative Jay Dickey, Republican of Arkansas, succeeded in pushing through an amendment that stripped $2.6 million from the disease control centers’ budget, the very amount it had spent on firearms-related research the year before.

“It’s really simple with me,” Mr. Dickey, 71 and now retired, said in a telephone interview. “We have the right to bear arms because of the threat of government taking over the freedoms that we have.”

The Senate later restored the money but designated it for research on traumatic brain injury. Language was also inserted into the centers’ appropriations bill that remains in place today: “None of the funds made available for injury prevention and control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may be used to advocate or promote gun control.”

The prohibition is striking, firearms researchers say, because there are already regulations that bar the use of C.D.C. money for lobbying for or against legislation. No other field of inquiry is singled out in this way.

In the end, researchers said, even though it is murky what exactly is allowed under this provision and what is not, the upshot is clear inside the centers: the agency should tread in this area only at its own peril.

“They had a near-death experience,” said Dr. Arthur Kellermann, whose study on the risks versus the benefits of having guns in the home became a focal point of attack by the N.R.A.

In the years since, the C.D.C. has been exceedingly wary of financing research focused on firearms. In its annual requests for proposals, for example, firearms research has been notably absent. Gail Hayes, spokeswoman for the centers, confirmed that since 1996, while the agency has issued requests for proposals that include the study of violence, which may include gun violence, it had not sent out any specifically on firearms.

“For policy to be effective, it needs to be based on evidence,” said Dr. Garen Wintemute, director of the Violence Prevention Research Program at the University of California, Davis, who had his C.D.C. financing cut in 1996. “The National Rifle Association and its allies in Congress have largely succeeded in choking off the development of evidence upon which that policy could be based.”

Private foundations initially stepped into the breach, but their attention tends to wax and wane, researchers said. They are also much more interested in work that leads to immediate results and less willing to finance basic epidemiological research that scientists say is necessary to establishing a foundation of knowledge about the connection between guns and violence, or the lack thereof.

The National Institute of Justice, part of the Justice Department, also used to finance firearms research, researchers said, but that money has also petered out in recent years. (Institute officials said they hoped to reinvigorate financing in this area.)

Stephen Teret, founding director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research, estimated that the amount of money available for firearms research was a quarter of what it used to be. With so much uncertainty about financing, Mr. Teret said, the circle of academics who study the phenomenon has fallen off significantly.

After the centers’ clash with the N.R.A., Mr. Teret said he was asked by C.D.C. officials to “curtail some things I was saying about guns and gun policy.”

Mr. Teret objected, saying his public comments about gun policy did not come while he was on the “C.D.C. meter.” After he threatened to file a lawsuit against the agency, Mr. Teret said, the officials backed down and gave him “a little bit more leeway.”

C.D.C. financing for research on gun violence has not stopped completely, but it is now mostly limited to work in which firearms are only a component.

The centers also ask researchers it finances to give it a heads-up anytime they are publishing studies that have anything to do with firearms. The agency, in turn, relays this information to the N.R.A. as a courtesy, said Thomas Skinner, a spokesman for the centers.

Invariably, researchers said, whenever their work touches upon firearms, the C.D.C. becomes squeamish. In the end, they said, it is often simply easier to avoid the topic if they want to continue to be in the agency’s good graces.

Dr. Stephen Hargarten, professor and chairman of emergency medicine at the Medical College of Wisconsin, used to direct a research center, financed by the C.D.C., that focused on gun violence, but he said he had now shifted his attention to other issues.
Posts: 46,882
Direckshun is obviously part of the inner Circle.Direckshun is obviously part of the inner Circle.Direckshun is obviously part of the inner Circle.Direckshun is obviously part of the inner Circle.Direckshun is obviously part of the inner Circle.Direckshun is obviously part of the inner Circle.Direckshun is obviously part of the inner Circle.Direckshun is obviously part of the inner Circle.Direckshun is obviously part of the inner Circle.Direckshun is obviously part of the inner Circle.Direckshun is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 12:11 PM   #706
Frazod Frazod is offline
Banned
 
Frazod's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: my own personal pig hell
Casino cash: $5050
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Salt Weapon View Post
For real? I shoot animals, it's how I feed my family asshole, I shoot, kill, and butcher about 6 deer a year, I violently kill about 30 halibut and 100 salmon each year too. Every once in a while I'll murder a moose or a bear. My family eats well. **** you.
Posted via Mobile Device
Heh. I guess this one's been banned most of the time you've been here. You'll love him. Take the absolute worst qualities of every liberal poster on this board, throw it in a blender, add some vinegar, water and estrogen, then pour it into a cocktail glass with a little pink umbrella and you'll get Wickedson.
Posts: 91,125
Frazod < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Frazod < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Frazod < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Frazod < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Frazod < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Frazod < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Frazod < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Frazod < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Frazod < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Frazod < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.Frazod < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 12:16 PM   #707
Fish Fish is offline
Missing Dick Curl
 
Fish's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $11326
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Salt Weapon View Post
For real? I shoot animals, it's how I feed my family asshole, I shoot, kill, and butcher about 6 deer a year, I violently kill about 30 halibut and 100 salmon each year too. Every once in a while I'll murder a moose or a bear. My family eats well. **** you.
Posted via Mobile Device
Yeah, but you don't need to do that stuff. You could just go to McDonalds and none of those poor animals would have to die at the hands of your murder machine.
__________________
Posts: 26,230
Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 12:17 PM   #708
Bambi Bambi is offline
Supporter
 
Bambi's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New York City
Casino cash: $13415
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Salt Weapon View Post
For real? I shoot animals, it's how I feed my family asshole, I shoot, kill, and butcher about 6 deer a year, I violently kill about 30 halibut and 100 salmon each year too. Every once in a while I'll murder a moose or a bear. My family eats well. **** you.
Posted via Mobile Device
www.seamlessweb.com

What you're eating sounds gross. But please, as soon as deer meat takes off in dining establishments the public actually uses, please...let me know.
__________________
The other thing about B-Rush is that he never lied. Coach Self would be like, “Did everyone make curfew last night? If you didn’t make curfew, raise your hand.” All of us that broke curfew kept our hands down — except B-Rush. He’d raise his hand and tell on himself. Coach Self would ask him why he didn’t make curfew and he’d say, “Because the club was crackin’!” Everyone would laugh and he’d make B-Rush run a little bit.
Posts: 13,231
Bambi has disabled reputation
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 12:20 PM   #709
Fish Fish is offline
Missing Dick Curl
 
Fish's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $11326
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wickedson View Post
www.seamlessweb.com

What you're eating sounds gross. But please, as soon as deer meat takes off in dining establishments the public actually uses, please...let me know.
You poor clueless bastard..
__________________
Posts: 26,230
Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.Fish is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 12:20 PM   #710
AussieChiefsFan AussieChiefsFan is offline
Mayday .... All Day
 
AussieChiefsFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Casino cash: $8349
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea View Post
This shows why you're not an American. The 2nd Amendment was not written so people could shoot deer. It was written to shoot government tyrants.

Now stfu and govern you're own damn country. So glad you can't vote here.
I wasn't necessarily referring to the 2nd amendment.

The point is, who the hell needs an assault rifle at all. And now that you bring up the 2nd amendment, who would need an assault rifle to defend themselves and their homes? Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the average American has an assault rifle lying around, but I still find it ridiculous that many do. When the amendment was first created it was in the day where single shot rifles that took seconds after each shot to reload, were the norm.
__________________
2013 Adopt-A-Chief: Sean "The Beard" McGrath
Posts: 12,315
AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 12:20 PM   #711
Cave Johnson Cave Johnson is offline
Andy the Big Reid Coach
 
Cave Johnson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: E. Bumf***istan
Casino cash: $10666
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider View Post
Only a dipshit would draw that conclusion from my post~
Only a complete idiot would expect historical accuracy from a 3 minute, tongue-in-check cartoon.
Posts: 10,236
Cave Johnson is too fat/Omaha.Cave Johnson is too fat/Omaha.Cave Johnson is too fat/Omaha.Cave Johnson is too fat/Omaha.Cave Johnson is too fat/Omaha.Cave Johnson is too fat/Omaha.Cave Johnson is too fat/Omaha.Cave Johnson is too fat/Omaha.Cave Johnson is too fat/Omaha.Cave Johnson is too fat/Omaha.Cave Johnson is too fat/Omaha.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 01:29 PM   #712
Der Flöprer Der Flöprer is offline
Flop Heil!
 
Der Flöprer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Top 5 CP Overlord
Casino cash: $10077213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radar Chief View Post
Yea, slavery. Brought here from Europe, which the white people here ended in a bloody war. Totally relevent to the NRA.
For the record, I'm for our 2nd amendment rights. The cartoon is funny though, and as mentioned earlier, contains satire.

Oh, and I don't carry. So please don't shoot me.
__________________
Grammar: The difference between knowing your shit, and knowing you're shit.
Posts: 47,778
Der Flöprer is obviously part of the inner Circle.Der Flöprer is obviously part of the inner Circle.Der Flöprer is obviously part of the inner Circle.Der Flöprer is obviously part of the inner Circle.Der Flöprer is obviously part of the inner Circle.Der Flöprer is obviously part of the inner Circle.Der Flöprer is obviously part of the inner Circle.Der Flöprer is obviously part of the inner Circle.Der Flöprer is obviously part of the inner Circle.Der Flöprer is obviously part of the inner Circle.Der Flöprer is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 01:34 PM   #713
BigRedChief BigRedChief is online now
Brainwashed
 
BigRedChief's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Swims with fishes
Casino cash: $19114
VARSITY
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Salt Weapon View Post
I shoot, kill, and butcher about 6 deer a year,
Posted via Mobile Device
So, you are the one who shot Bambi's mother?, His cousin and aunt?
__________________
If you don't have a seat at the table, you're probably on the menu
Posts: 44,930
BigRedChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.BigRedChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.BigRedChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.BigRedChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.BigRedChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.BigRedChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.BigRedChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.BigRedChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.BigRedChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.BigRedChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.BigRedChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 01:35 PM   #714
Munson Munson is offline
Roy E.
 
Munson's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Olathe, KS
Casino cash: $10267171
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod View Post
I'm just fighting Direckshun with Direckshun. What, you don't like it?

Please rephrase the question. You're just not being very clear.
Too funny!
__________________
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Posts: 4,744
Munson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Munson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Munson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Munson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Munson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Munson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Munson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Munson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Munson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Munson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.Munson is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 02:13 PM   #715
A Salt Weapon A Salt Weapon is offline
Veteran
 
A Salt Weapon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Alaska
Casino cash: $8146
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRedChief View Post
So, you are the one who shot Bambi's mother?, His cousin and aunt?
Yeah, sorry.
Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 1,806
A Salt Weapon is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.A Salt Weapon is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.A Salt Weapon is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.A Salt Weapon is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.A Salt Weapon is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.A Salt Weapon is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.A Salt Weapon is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.A Salt Weapon is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.A Salt Weapon is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.A Salt Weapon is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.A Salt Weapon is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 03:16 PM   #716
donkhater donkhater is offline
Brilliant!!
 
donkhater's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Zionsville, IN, USA
Casino cash: $7634
Quote:
Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan View Post
I wasn't necessarily referring to the 2nd amendment.

The point is, who the hell needs an assault rifle at all. And now that you bring up the 2nd amendment, who would need an assault rifle to defend themselves and their homes? Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the average American has an assault rifle lying around, but I still find it ridiculous that many do. When the amendment was first created it was in the day where single shot rifles that took seconds after each shot to reload, were the norm.
That's right. And to Buc's point, does the military or police force still use muskets? No. So the second amendment wouldn't really be of any use if it was narrow in its scope of what arms the citizenry could bear, would it?
__________________
The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants
Posts: 3,709
donkhater would the whole thing.donkhater would the whole thing.donkhater would the whole thing.donkhater would the whole thing.donkhater would the whole thing.donkhater would the whole thing.donkhater would the whole thing.donkhater would the whole thing.donkhater would the whole thing.donkhater would the whole thing.donkhater would the whole thing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 03:19 PM   #717
AussieChiefsFan AussieChiefsFan is offline
Mayday .... All Day
 
AussieChiefsFan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Casino cash: $8349
Quote:
Originally Posted by donkhater View Post
That's right. And to Buc's point, does the military or police force still use muskets? No. So the second amendment wouldn't really be of any use if it was narrow in its scope of what arms the citizenry could bear, would it?
No, but weapons appropriate for home defense and appropriate for the military would be two very different things.
__________________
2013 Adopt-A-Chief: Sean "The Beard" McGrath
Posts: 12,315
AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.AussieChiefsFan is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 03:28 PM   #718
KChiefer KChiefer is offline
Fantastic Planeteer
 
KChiefer's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Champaign, IL
Casino cash: $6821


Overthrows an entire Empire without using guns. Gets assassinated by one lunatic with a gun.
Posts: 4,943
KChiefer wants to die in a aids tree fire.KChiefer wants to die in a aids tree fire.KChiefer wants to die in a aids tree fire.KChiefer wants to die in a aids tree fire.KChiefer wants to die in a aids tree fire.KChiefer wants to die in a aids tree fire.KChiefer wants to die in a aids tree fire.KChiefer wants to die in a aids tree fire.KChiefer wants to die in a aids tree fire.KChiefer wants to die in a aids tree fire.KChiefer wants to die in a aids tree fire.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 03:41 PM   #719
LiveSteam LiveSteam is offline
All aboard the crazy train
 
LiveSteam's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: homeof43conferencetitles
Casino cash: $11202
Quote:
Originally Posted by AussieChiefsFan View Post
No, but weapons appropriate for home defense and appropriate for the military would be two very different things.
Weapons at home should be capable of taking on Military,Police ect.
Thats the hole point of the 2nd.
You idiots want us to only have pee shooters & junk weapons that we could never use to rise against the machine if need be.
& when you say take away armor piercing bullets. You are talking about almost every high power rifle caliber on earth.
Posts: 17,383
LiveSteam is obviously part of the inner Circle.LiveSteam is obviously part of the inner Circle.LiveSteam is obviously part of the inner Circle.LiveSteam is obviously part of the inner Circle.LiveSteam is obviously part of the inner Circle.LiveSteam is obviously part of the inner Circle.LiveSteam is obviously part of the inner Circle.LiveSteam is obviously part of the inner Circle.LiveSteam is obviously part of the inner Circle.LiveSteam is obviously part of the inner Circle.LiveSteam is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 03:48 PM   #720
CoMoChief CoMoChief is offline
The Revolution Has Begun
 
CoMoChief's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: KCMO
Casino cash: $11014
Quote:
Originally Posted by frazod View Post
Heh. I guess this one's been banned most of the time you've been here. You'll love him. Take the absolute worst qualities of every liberal poster on this board, throw it in a blender, add some vinegar, water and estrogen, then pour it into a cocktail glass with a little pink umbrella and you'll get Wickedson.
I don't laugh at a lot of stuff you say on here......but that's funny.
__________________
2014 Adopt-A-Chief: RT Donald Stephenson #79
Posts: 31,227
CoMoChief threw an interception on a screen pass.CoMoChief threw an interception on a screen pass.CoMoChief threw an interception on a screen pass.CoMoChief threw an interception on a screen pass.CoMoChief threw an interception on a screen pass.CoMoChief threw an interception on a screen pass.CoMoChief threw an interception on a screen pass.CoMoChief threw an interception on a screen pass.CoMoChief threw an interception on a screen pass.CoMoChief threw an interception on a screen pass.CoMoChief threw an interception on a screen pass.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:00 PM.


This is a test for a client's site.
A new website that shows member-created construction site listings that need fill or have excess fill. Dirt Monkey @ https://DirtMonkey.net
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.