Chiefs Chiefs on verge of a deal with Andy Reid (merged) - Page 65

Carlota69 · 10:02 PM

I just saw it on his Facebook status...

UPDATE:

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter

Update from @mortreport: Cards visit with Andy Reid is off, Chiefs have not scheduled other visits with candidates, hoping to wrap deal Fri.

BradBigglestein · 01-02-2013, 01:52 PM

Eagles fan here. I can break down the pros and cons of Reid if anyone wants. I'm sure all here who are national football fans as well as Chiefs fans know some about Reid, but there is stuff that doesn't make the national headlines that is more locally known about him.

**OnTheWarpath58** · 01-02-2013, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

810 was bagging on Clark because he took Pioli with him to Atlanta. I'm like, well, if the boss has concerns one way he determines how to address them is to watch his guy in action. I mean that's one thought anyway.

I'd want that mother****er with me too, so I could keep an eye on him.

I'm sure as **** not leaving him in KC unattended.

Then again, this could have all been avoided by just firing the assclown on Monday.

htismaqe · 01-02-2013, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier

He said that it's looking like none of what Hunt said is true, but then he stopped himself and said, I don't want to call Hunt a liar, but...

Yep.

**petegz28** · 01-02-2013, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier

He said that it's looking like none of what Hunt said is true, but then he stopped himself and said, I don't want to call Hunt a liar, but...

Two days after the interview and Clark is a liar because Pioli is still here and we don't have a new coach signed yet.

**DaneMcCloud** · 01-02-2013, 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

810 was also saying that the Cards are a more attractive opportunity than the Chiefs. Which I don't agree with assuming Pioli us shewed the door one way or the other.

What do you know about the Cardinals, Pete?

I'm guessing nothing. As usual.

tomahawk kid · 01-02-2013, 01:53 PM

I don't think KK has watched any sports outside of K State football for several years.

I'm also sorta shocked they stopped talking about golf / mortgage rates to discuss the Chiefs coaching search.

notorious · 01-02-2013, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradBigglestein

Eagles fan here. I can break down the pros and cons of Reid if anyone wants. I'm sure all here who are national football fans as well as Chiefs fans know some about Reid, but there is stuff that doesn't make the national headlines that is more locally known about him.

Let er' rip, please.

**petegz28** · 01-02-2013, 01:54 PM

610 starting to jump on the "why is Pioli even still here?" bandwagon.

Zeke · 01-02-2013, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

810 was also saying that the Cards are a more attractive opportunity than the Chiefs. Which I don't agree with assuming Pioli us shewed the door one way or the other.

Pioli still being with the Chiefs is a HUGE negative for anyone that is going to consider the job.

**GloryDayz** · 01-02-2013, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Now they're speculating that Pioli is being retained because Clark doesn't want him to turn coat during the trials on the age discrimination lawsuits.

Is there some age limit of being a bad football person?

Detoxing · 01-02-2013, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradBigglestein

Eagles fan here. I can break down the pros and cons of Reid if anyone wants. I'm sure all here who are national football fans as well as Chiefs fans know some about Reid, but there is stuff that doesn't make the national headlines that is more locally known about him.

Go ahead, shoot.

tomahawk kid · 01-02-2013, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradBigglestein

Eagles fan here. I can break down the pros and cons of Reid if anyone wants. I'm sure all here who are national football fans as well as Chiefs fans know some about Reid, but there is stuff that doesn't make the national headlines that is more locally known about him.

Please.

tooge · 01-02-2013, 01:55 PM

It’s a surprisingly simple deal, based on a review of the information and communications with a source having direct knowledge of the negotiation process. Manning gets an $18 million fully guaranteed base salary for 2012. Though he doesn’t get a signing bonus, he’ll receive $6 million of the $18 million base salary as an advance.

Then, if Manning is on the Broncos’ roster on the final day of the 2012 league year, his base salaries of $20 million in 2013 and $20 million in 2014 become fully guaranteed.

In other words, the Broncos can cut Manning at any point after Super Bowl XLVII and before the last day before the start of the 2013 league year and limit the contract to a one-year, $18 million investment. And so, just as the Colts faced a $28 million decision in March 2012, the Broncos will face a $40 million decision in March of 2013.

That said, there’s a limited out for the 2014 base salary, for one specific reason. If, during the 2013 season, Manning suffers another injury to his neck, the Broncos will be off the hook for the $20 million in 2014. If Manning suffers an injury, regardless of severity, to any other area of his body, he still gets the $20 million in 2014.

Then, if Manning is on the roster on the final day of the 2014 league year (which will occur in February or March of 2015), his base salary of $19 million in 2015 will become fully guaranteed.

Finally, if Manning is on the roster for the final day of the 2015 league year (which will occur in February or March of 2016), his base salary of $19 million for 2016 will be fully guaranteed.

It’s that simple. The Broncos have the unilateral right to drop Manning before the end of the 2012, 2014, or 2015 league year and avoid the remaining $78 million, $38 million, or $19 million, respectively. And if Manning suffers another neck injury during the 2013 season, the deal can be capped at two years and $38 million

**OnTheWarpath58** · 01-02-2013, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

610 starting to jump on the "why is Pioli even still here?" bandwagon.

Anyone with a brain KNOWS why Pioli is still here.

But they have to keep making shit up to fill airtime.

mr. tegu · 01-02-2013, 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

I'd want that mother****er with me too, so I could keep an eye on him.

I'm sure as **** not leaving him in KC unattended.

Then again, this could have all been avoided by just firing the assclown on Monday.

Pioli probably would have offered Dirk a contract if Hunt didn't show up.

01-02-2013, 01:52 PM	#961
BradBigglestein Starter Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $2265	Eagles fan here. I can break down the pros and cons of Reid if anyone wants. I'm sure all here who are national football fans as well as Chiefs fans know some about Reid, but there is stuff that doesn't make the national headlines that is more locally known about him.
Posts: 130

01-02-2013, 01:53 PM	#966
tomahawk kid Drunk in the Neighborhood Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Beating the War Drums Casino cash: $45977	I don't think KK has watched any sports outside of K State football for several years. I'm also sorta shocked they stopped talking about golf / mortgage rates to discuss the Chiefs coaching search.
Posts: 5,476

01-02-2013, 01:54 PM	#968
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $214434	610 starting to jump on the "why is Pioli even still here?" bandwagon. __________________ "Finally, anyone who uses the terms, irregardless, a whole nother, or all of the sudden shall be sentenced to a work camp." Stewie Griffin
Posts: 57,761

01-02-2013, 01:55 PM	#973
tooge MVP Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Liberty, MO Casino cash: $75931	It’s a surprisingly simple deal, based on a review of the information and communications with a source having direct knowledge of the negotiation process. Manning gets an $18 million fully guaranteed base salary for 2012. Though he doesn’t get a signing bonus, he’ll receive $6 million of the $18 million base salary as an advance. Then, if Manning is on the Broncos’ roster on the final day of the 2012 league year, his base salaries of $20 million in 2013 and $20 million in 2014 become fully guaranteed. In other words, the Broncos can cut Manning at any point after Super Bowl XLVII and before the last day before the start of the 2013 league year and limit the contract to a one-year, $18 million investment. And so, just as the Colts faced a $28 million decision in March 2012, the Broncos will face a $40 million decision in March of 2013. That said, there’s a limited out for the 2014 base salary, for one specific reason. If, during the 2013 season, Manning suffers another injury to his neck, the Broncos will be off the hook for the $20 million in 2014. If Manning suffers an injury, regardless of severity, to any other area of his body, he still gets the $20 million in 2014. Then, if Manning is on the roster on the final day of the 2014 league year (which will occur in February or March of 2015), his base salary of $19 million in 2015 will become fully guaranteed. Finally, if Manning is on the roster for the final day of the 2015 league year (which will occur in February or March of 2016), his base salary of $19 million for 2016 will be fully guaranteed. It’s that simple. The Broncos have the unilateral right to drop Manning before the end of the 2012, 2014, or 2015 league year and avoid the remaining $78 million, $38 million, or $19 million, respectively. And if Manning suffers another neck injury during the 2013 season, the deal can be capped at two years and $38 million
Posts: 6,847

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode