Chiefs Chiefs on verge of a deal with Andy Reid (merged) - Page 95

Carlota69 · 10:02 PM

I just saw it on his Facebook status...

UPDATE:

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan

Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter

Update from @mortreport: Cards visit with Andy Reid is off, Chiefs have not scheduled other visits with candidates, hoping to wrap deal Fri.

htismaqe · 01-02-2013, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Then it all comes back to keeping him on because all he cares about is money?

That's the prevailing speculation.

**DoucheMcCloud** · 01-02-2013, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu

In 2012 Morris averaged 4.8 ypc. In 2011 McGahee average 4.8 ypc. Charles is on a completely different level than those guys, averaging 6.4 ypc in 2010. The first two had success because of the running QB and the option offense. Charles had success in spite of the QB.

Any average NFL RB would be doing what Morris is doing this season or what McGahee did with Denver in 2011. Even Lance Ball averaged 4.8 ypc on nearly 100 carries.

Whether we lose one or both the Chiefs d-line is not nearly as devoid of talent as you are making it out to be. Compared to what the Cardinals have to do on their o-line, our d-line is in much better shape. Our secondary is what we need to address on defense. Not the ILB you keep brining up which is one of least positions of need on any defense.

Yeah their o-line sucks. What is your point? That it is not going to be as easy a fix as you are suggesting? No one is arguing against that a large part of their troubles are o-line but to suggest that is an easy fix and our issues are somehow much tougher is disingenuous.

And again, a premise of yours is that Whisenhunt is a good coach, with which I agree. Well why couldn't they have a better year if they supposedly have all this talent? And if the reason they didn't have a good year is because of o-line and QB, well then you are underestimating how important those things are to that team. It is either Whisenhunt isn't that good or the talent isn't clearly better than any other teams'. Either way one of your arguments is wrong, so which do you choose?

What a bunch of bullshit.

Jackson, Dorsey, Bailey, Smith and Pituatoa SUCK. Silar is garbage. I'm healthier than Kendrick Lewis and I'm 47 years old.

You can argue all you want but that doesn't change the fact that the Chiefs need a shit ton of personnel on BOTH sides of the ball before they can compete for the playoffs, especially considering there's not an RGIII or Andrew Luck or even a Cam Newton available this year.

I said it in 2009 and I'll say it again in 2013: Scott ***** set this franchise back FIVE YEARS with the selections of Tyson Jackson and Matt Cassel and it could be several more years before they're ready to compete consistently.

htismaqe · 01-02-2013, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier

Reid is interviewing for GM?

Of course.

Scott ***** has abdicated his role as GM since he's now the Devil.

Brock · 01-02-2013, 04:31 PM

Jesus ****ing christ. The worst gm since matt millen gets to keep his job and people here are rationalizing it? "Well, he'll just be handling contracts"

**** this.

O.city · 01-02-2013, 04:32 PM

Funny that a few days ago it was, "***** can't do anything, dude is an asshole, successful at nothing"

Now we are contemplating it being ok to keep him around in any capacity?

Detoxing · 01-02-2013, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

So why take ***** to Philly?

Reid has to test Scooter's BJ skills.

**Pestilence** · 01-02-2013, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler

If you were planning to fire someone would you bring them along to interview their potential replacement?

Reid is not *****'s potential replacement. ***** is still on the payroll. Like I said....we've heard nothing about ***** in the interview. FFS....he could've just sat there while Hunt did the interview.

ChiefMojo · 01-02-2013, 04:32 PM

Again if ***** is here next season, it will be in a role no different than he was in New England. If that isn't true and he still runs the teams... then you can call Clark on the lie.

TEX · 01-02-2013, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Still got an obsession with me I see. That's fine, I'm sexy, smart, and funny.

I don't do cuckold thing though. You'll have to find somebody else to **** your girlfriend/wife.

No - I think you're an idiot, who is full of yourself, and you prove it in times like these.

jd1020 · 01-02-2013, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Funny that a few days ago it was, "***** can't do anything, dude is an asshole, successful at nothing"

Now we are contemplating it being ok to keep him around in any capacity?

I've never said that.

I want ***** gone, but at the same time I can see his worth and it's not in the personnel department. It's obvious, to me, that for Clark firing ***** is the last resort. If it came down to dividing power by giving Reid personnel power and moving ***** back into his NE role, then I'll take it, at least until the Chiefs pass on a QB with the #1 pick.

**dirk digler** · 01-02-2013, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier

Reid is interviewing for GM?

From my understanding Reid would want personnel control so basically Scott is left with ball washing duties

**Pestilence** · 01-02-2013, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Funny that a few days ago it was, "***** can't do anything, dude is an asshole, successful at nothing"

Now we are contemplating it being ok to keep him around in any capacity?

I'm not. I'm just not going to freak the **** out because ***** was in an interview.

I've already stated that if ***** is with this organization next year.....I'm not here as a fan. So it's a win/win for me. ***** is gone and I get to be a fan. ***** is back and my Sundays are ****ing open.

O.city · 01-02-2013, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Reid is not *****'s potential replacement. ***** is still on the payroll. Like I said....we've heard nothing about ***** in the interview. FFS....he could've just sat there while Hunt did the interview.

So why take him? If you are working a buyout, why take him?

Detoxing · 01-02-2013, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

Funny that a few days ago it was, "***** can't do anything, dude is an asshole, successful at nothing"

Now we are contemplating it being ok to keep him around in any capacity?

It would be nice if it were our decision to make, but it's not.

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 01-02-2013, 04:34 PM

Would this fan base accept Bill Parcells and Scott *****? I'm not talking about CP, I already know that answer. The fan base. Would they accept it?

01-02-2013, 04:31 PM	#1414
Brock Do it. Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Larryville Casino cash: $142473	Jesus **ing christ. The worst gm since matt millen gets to keep his job and people here are rationalizing it? "Well, he'll just be handling contracts" ** this.
Posts: 40,405

01-02-2013, 04:32 PM	#1415
O.city MVP Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $84828	Funny that a few days ago it was, "***** can't do anything, dude is an asshole, successful at nothing" Now we are contemplating it being ok to keep him around in any capacity?
Posts: 20,027

01-02-2013, 04:32 PM	#1418
ChiefMojo Happy, Happy, Happy!!! Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $25494	Again if ***** is here next season, it will be in a role no different than he was in New England. If that isn't true and he still runs the teams... then you can call Clark on the lie.
Posts: 2,236

01-02-2013, 04:34 PM	#1425
Mr. Flopnuts Banned Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Down the rabbit hole Casino cash: $113741111	Would this fan base accept Bill Parcells and Scott *****? I'm not talking about CP, I already know that answer. The fan base. Would they accept it?
Posts: 41,503

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode