Chiefs John Dorsey - Page 19

Mr_Tomahawk · 07:20 PM

Go get him!

**keg in kc** · 01-08-2013, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

That wasn't the point.

It should be. Nothing else matters until you take care of the QB.

Mr. Pink · 01-08-2013, 04:04 PM

We dont get the luxury of taking the BPA, Peehole ruined our QB shituation. No other position matters to me in this draft. Take a QB in all rounds if need be. This is a QB league and right now we are getting donkey fuked at that position. After we have a QB, than we can start taking BPA each year.

Dorsey of all people knows the importance of having a playmaking QB. So yes RUNKC, I'll be pissed if we take ANY other position other than QB #1

Dante84 · 01-08-2013, 04:08 PM

"Best Player Available" and Positional Value do not have to be mutually exclusive. So many fail to understand this. Think outside the box.

You can develop a scoring system that takes into account:
- Roster Need (Go 80 deep by position and depth)
- Positional value (ranking against others of the same position and type)
- Measurables (combine stats, height/weight, hand size)
- Talent (body of work, performance, stats, accomplishments)
- Risk (injury, off the field)
- Intelligence (football IQ, general IQ)
- Intangibles (leadership, personality, work ethic)

Grade each prospect. Grade each FA. Update your grades regularly. Compare with those you trust. Combine grades......

AND BOOM.

You have a formula to determine the "Best Player Available."

okcchief · 01-08-2013, 04:13 PM

If a QB close to overall best on the board they will take one. It's the biggest position of need. Unless they pick up one through free agency or the a trade. I hope they pick Geno because I will have to stay away from the board if not. The meltdowns will be ridiculous. I'm trusting the regime for a couple of years and see how it goes. I know the old one would **** it up, but if you are happy about the hires you have to ride it until they are proven wrong IMO.

NJChiefsFan · 01-08-2013, 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

This is why the New York Giants are good every year.

A few years ago people were a little confused with their pick of JPP because they already had Osi, Tuck and Kiwanuka.

That sure turned out for the best.

How does it turn out of they have an average QB on their team instead of Eli Manning?

htismaqe · 01-08-2013, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

It should be. Nothing else matters until you take care of the QB.

Exactly.

RunKC · 01-08-2013, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

It should be. Nothing else matters until you take care of the QB.

I agree.

I'm just tired of taking reaches like Javier Arenas, Dexter McCluster and Tyson Jackson when there are better players on the board.

Mother****erJones · 01-08-2013, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

I agree.

I'm just tired of taking reaches like Javier Arenas, Dexter McCluster and Tyson Jackson when there are better players on the board.

Buddy you dont have that to worry about anymore!

Nightfyre · 01-08-2013, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84

"Best Player Available" and Positional Value do not have to be mutually exclusive. So many fail to understand this. Think outside the box.

You can develop a scoring system that takes into account:
- Roster Need (Go 80 deep by position and depth)
- Positional value (ranking against others of the same position and type)
- Measurables (combine stats, height/weight, hand size)
- Talent (body of work, performance, stats, accomplishments)
- Risk (injury, off the field)
- Intelligence (football IQ, general IQ)
- Intangibles (leadership, personality, work ethic)

Grade each prospect. Grade each FA. Update your grades regularly. Compare with those you trust. Combine grades......

AND BOOM.

You have a formula to determine the "Best Player Available."

Better yet, you can weight each of those categories as necessary for each position, etc. to further refine the model. For example, you may not care about a CB or RB's football IQ. Because clearly it doesn't matter.

Mr. Pink · 01-08-2013, 04:45 PM

BPA = Biggest Penis Available = Geno Smith

Chiefs Pantalones · 01-08-2013, 04:51 PM

I just don't see any reason not to take a QB with the first pick. Who else is there that just says, "This guy would benefit our team more than insert whichever QB the team thinks is best in the draft."

Who we gonna pick up in FA? Vick=sucks. Alex Smith=sucks. Matt Flynn=get out of here.

I think we should do what the Skins did. Draft a QB with our first pick, then pick another one in the mid rounds. JMO.

Mi_chief_fan · 01-08-2013, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by @KCsporting

BPA = Biggest Penis Available = Geno Smith

Wow.

FAX · 01-08-2013, 04:56 PM

Mayhaps many of us are suffering from lingering Dr. Evilism. If Herm can draft, so can Wally.

Besides, every team hits a few and misses some. It just goes with the territory. But, so far as quarterback is concerned, who in their right mind believes that Wally can or be willing to coach a team that has no quarterback? Only guys like Herm and Haley and Roleo can do something like that.

I say we allow the ladies to do the fretting and gnashing of teeth whilst we focus on giving Wally more than two days to organize and prioritize the team needs ... oh, and trapping gophers. Focus on giving Wally more than two days and trapping gophers. But that's it.

FAX

htismaqe · 01-08-2013, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

I agree.

I'm just tired of taking reaches like Javier Arenas, Dexter McCluster and Tyson Jackson when there are better players on the board.

So are we. All the more reason to take a QB.

PGM · 01-08-2013, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mi_chief_fan

Wow.

01-03-2013, 08:36 PM
Mr_Tomahawk Prestige Worldwide Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Spring Hill, KS Casino cash: $87337	John Dorsey Go get him! Last edited by Mr_Tomahawk; 01-05-2013 at 07:20 PM..
Posts: 10,044

01-08-2013, 04:04 PM	#272
Mr. Pink Chief Inspiration Officer(CIO) Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Overland Park, Ks Casino cash: $2564	We dont get the luxury of taking the BPA, Peehole ruined our QB shituation. No other position matters to me in this draft. Take a QB in all rounds if need be. This is a QB league and right now we are getting donkey fuked at that position. After we have a QB, than we can start taking BPA each year. Dorsey of all people knows the importance of having a playmaking QB. So yes RUNKC, I'll be pissed if we take ANY other position other than QB #1 __________________ *I once told Scott PeeHole that "He Sucked" to his face. I've slept well ever since.*
Posts: 1,289

01-08-2013, 04:08 PM	#273
Dante84 Tossed Salad & Scrambled Eggs Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: ATX & OPKS Casino cash: $97785	"Best Player Available" and Positional Value do not have to be mutually exclusive. So many fail to understand this. Think outside the box. You can develop a scoring system that takes into account: - Roster Need (Go 80 deep by position and depth) - Positional value (ranking against others of the same position and type) - Measurables (combine stats, height/weight, hand size) - Talent (body of work, performance, stats, accomplishments) - Risk (injury, off the field) - Intelligence (football IQ, general IQ) - Intangibles (leadership, personality, work ethic) Grade each prospect. Grade each FA. Update your grades regularly. Compare with those you trust. Combine grades...... AND BOOM. You have a formula to determine the "Best Player Available." __________________ From: ***, Scott Sent: Tuesday, August 31st, 2010 8:50 AM To: Hamilton, Brandon Subject:** RE: AC in Weight Room Brandon - gum wrapper and ball of hair on player staircase for two days now... scott
Posts: 7,547

01-08-2013, 04:13 PM	#274
okcchief Veteran Join Date: Jul 2008 Casino cash: $37014	If a QB close to overall best on the board they will take one. It's the biggest position of need. Unless they pick up one through free agency or the a trade. I hope they pick Geno because I will have to stay away from the board if not. The meltdowns will be ridiculous. I'm trusting the regime for a couple of years and see how it goes. I know the old one would **** it up, but if you are happy about the hires you have to ride it until they are proven wrong IMO.
Posts: 4,224

01-08-2013, 04:45 PM	#280
Mr. Pink Chief Inspiration Officer(CIO) Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Overland Park, Ks Casino cash: $2564	BPA = Biggest Penis Available = Geno Smith __________________ *I once told Scott PeeHole that "He Sucked" to his face. I've slept well ever since.*
Posts: 1,289

01-08-2013, 04:51 PM	#281
Chiefs Pantalones GO CHIEFS!!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Arrowhead Casino cash: $89025	I just don't see any reason not to take a QB with the first pick. Who else is there that just says, "This guy would benefit our team more than insert whichever QB the team thinks is best in the draft." Who we gonna pick up in FA? Vick=sucks. Alex Smith=sucks. Matt Flynn=get out of here. I think we should do what the Skins did. Draft a QB with our first pick, then pick another one in the mid rounds. JMO. __________________ Looking for lower level seats for the Cowboys at Chiefs tickets for the smelly pirate hooker Cowboys fan wife and I!
Posts: 21,747

01-08-2013, 04:56 PM	#283
FAX testing ... 1, 2, 3 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Tennessee Casino cash: $14074138	Mayhaps many of us are suffering from lingering Dr. Evilism. If Herm can draft, so can Wally. Besides, every team hits a few and misses some. It just goes with the territory. But, so far as quarterback is concerned, who in their right mind believes that Wally can or be willing to coach a team that has no quarterback? Only guys like Herm and Haley and Roleo can do something like that. I say we allow the ladies to do the fretting and gnashing of teeth whilst we focus on giving Wally more than two days to organize and prioritize the team needs ... oh, and trapping gophers. Focus on giving Wally more than two days and trapping gophers. But that's it. FAX
Posts: 37,654

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode