Football Matt Flynn rumors: Seahawks would reportedly trade QB - Page 3

Deberg_1990 · 01-23-2013, 07:03 AM

http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/1/2...umors-seahwaks

http://twitter.com/JasonColeYahoo/st...82142142918656

Seattle Seahawks quarterback Matt Flynn's strange season — in which he went from presumed starter in Seattle to backup to one of the season's best story lines — has ended, and not surprisingly, trade talks have swirled around Flynn ever since the Seahawks' season ended.

Not backing down from the rumors, Seattle has reportedly informed Flynn that he indeed is on the trading block and the Seahawks are willing to part ways with the remaining two years of his contract.

But for the many teams in need of an upgrade at the quarterback position, Seattle's quarterback situation has actually convinced other teams to avoid talking potential trades.
Rookie Russell Wilson notably gave the Seahawks a viable, cheap and exciting new face to the franchise at quarterback, and Flynn never really got a chance to prove his worth after signing a three-year, $19.5-million contract in March 2012.

Now, with the option to either trade or cut Flynn, many teams expect Seattle to simple cut the quarterback, opening up the chase for the former backup to Aaron Rodgers with the Green Bay Packers without any team having to send Seattle anything in return.

Teams who are likely interested in keeping as much of the draft picks and young talent that they currently have while pursuing other options at quarterback would certainly prefer to sign Flynn on the open market as opposed to having to give up anything in return.

Flynn, who originally attracted much of the attention pointed his way during a Week 17 start against the Detroit Lions to close out the 2011 season, could land with a number of teams next season, either as a starter or a trustworthy backup.

Teams interested in Flynn in either a starting or backup role could include the New York Jets, Cleveland Browns and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, which all missed the playoffs in 2012 and could be looking for a change of tone in their offenses.

Sorter · 01-23-2013, 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCFaninSEA

If the Seachickens can't trade him he will stay there. What they pay combined for Wilson and Flynn is very manageable. They also are in good position cap wise. Paul Allen is the owner so money isn't an issue. I think the differences in styles is what is driving discussions. If Wilson got hurt Flynn couldn't run that style of offense nearly as well.

Frosty · 01-23-2013, 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

That's exactly who I think Pete is going to take. When?

I'd guess 4th round unless his stock shoots up after the Combine. Of course, Seattle has shown they'll reach for players they want.

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 01-23-2013, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty

I'd guess 4th round unless his stock shoots up after the Combine. Of course, Seattle has shown they'll reach for players they want.

Exactly what I was getting at. I think Pete is going to take him in the 2nd round.

Molitoth · 01-23-2013, 09:26 AM

Flynn has such a small sample size of NFL play that Seattle way overpaid for him.
Flynn is a much larger unknown than Matt Cassel was.

NO to FLYNN.

Frosty · 01-23-2013, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

Exactly what I was getting at. I think Pete is going to take him in the 2nd round.

It will be a late 2nd and all but that seems high for Scott.

Fat Elvis · 01-23-2013, 09:35 AM

I'd give the comp pick we get for Carr to trade for Flynn if he agrees to restructure his contract. He's a backup QB--and we need one. Cassel and Quinn (not to mention Stanzi) don't even cut that mustard.

Edit: This, of course, is assuming that he isn't cut outright.

milkman · 01-23-2013, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rageeumr

I wouldn't be excited about a trade or paying his salary, but I trust Pioli's opinion of the kid. He's seen a hell of a lot more of him than I have.

FYP to reflect those that were posted 4 years ago.

milkman · 01-23-2013, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

I'd give the comp pick we get for Carr to trade for Flynn if he agrees to restructure his contract. He's a backup QB--and we need one. Cassel and Quinn (not to mention Stanzi) don't even cut that mustard.

First....Hell no.

No way in hell I'd be okay with trading any picks.

Second, comp picks can not be traded per NFL rules.

**Pestilence** · 01-23-2013, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

Why do you say the Hawks will cut him. He's being shopped according to rumors. Not sure if anyone is going to make a deal for him as a starter though, and that's where the rub is.

If they don't find a trade partner, he'll BU Wilson, that's what he's doing now.

It was reported on Rotoworld that teams around the league don't think that the Seahawks have a chance in hell of trading them. They're waiting around for them to cut him because they don't want to pay Flynn $5 million to be a backup.

Fat Elvis · 01-23-2013, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

First....Hell no.

No way in hell I'd be okay with trading any picks.

Second, comp picks can not be traded per NFL rules.

I did not know that. Thanks for the info.

I'd still give a 4th for him then, but that is just me. We're going to have to use two draft picks on QBs anyway if we get rid of both Cassel and Quinn. I want both of those guys off the team.

htismaqe · 01-23-2013, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

I did not know that. Thanks for the info.

I'd still give a 4th for him then, but that is just me. We're going to have to use two draft picks on QBs anyway if we get rid of both Cassel and Quinn. I want both of those guys off the team.

I'd rather use the 4th on a QB in the draft. Much, much more upside...

listopencil · 01-23-2013, 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

If Flynn is let go, I'd have no problem with the Chiefs signing him to back-up whoever they draft #1.

That makes a lot of sense.

mcaj22 · 01-23-2013, 09:52 AM

id rather use the 4th on drafting a starter at one of the many position holes on this crap team.

we will already be taking a QB in the first, no need for one in the 4th when we can still get a starter there.

**DaKCMan AP** · 01-23-2013, 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buzz_TinBalls

He threw 6 TD's during a regular season NFL game. I'd give him a look too if I were Dorsey/Reid.

sez stoopids

**bevischief** · 01-23-2013, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

I'd give the comp pick we get for Carr to trade for Flynn if he agrees to restructure his contract. He's a backup QB--and we need one. Cassel and Quinn (not to mention Stanzi) don't even cut that mustard.

Edit: This, of course, is assuming that he isn't cut outright.

You can't trade comp picks.

01-23-2013, 07:03 AM
Deberg_1990 MVP Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: San Antonio Tx. Casino cash: $140959	Matt Flynn rumors: Seahawks would reportedly trade QB http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/1/2...umors-seahwaks http://twitter.com/JasonColeYahoo/st...82142142918656 Seattle Seahawks quarterback Matt Flynn's strange season — in which he went from presumed starter in Seattle to backup to one of the season's best story lines — has ended, and not surprisingly, trade talks have swirled around Flynn ever since the Seahawks' season ended. Not backing down from the rumors, Seattle has reportedly informed Flynn that he indeed is on the trading block and the Seahawks are willing to part ways with the remaining two years of his contract. But for the many teams in need of an upgrade at the quarterback position, Seattle's quarterback situation has actually convinced other teams to avoid talking potential trades. Rookie Russell Wilson notably gave the Seahawks a viable, cheap and exciting new face to the franchise at quarterback, and Flynn never really got a chance to prove his worth after signing a three-year, $19.5-million contract in March 2012. Now, with the option to either trade or cut Flynn, many teams expect Seattle to simple cut the quarterback, opening up the chase for the former backup to Aaron Rodgers with the Green Bay Packers without any team having to send Seattle anything in return. Teams who are likely interested in keeping as much of the draft picks and young talent that they currently have while pursuing other options at quarterback would certainly prefer to sign Flynn on the open market as opposed to having to give up anything in return. Flynn, who originally attracted much of the attention pointed his way during a Week 17 start against the Detroit Lions to close out the 2011 season, could land with a number of teams next season, either as a starter or a trustworthy backup. Teams interested in Flynn in either a starting or backup role could include the New York Jets, Cleveland Browns and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, which all missed the playoffs in 2012 and could be looking for a change of tone in their offenses.
Posts: 43,800

01-23-2013, 09:26 AM	#34
Molitoth Chiefs Rubberneck Join Date: Apr 2004 Casino cash: $84835	Flynn has such a small sample size of NFL play that Seattle way overpaid for him. Flynn is a much larger unknown than Matt Cassel was. NO to FLYNN.
Posts: 9,775

01-23-2013, 09:35 AM	#36
Fat Elvis Wow! Wowie-wow-wow-wow! Join Date: Apr 2001 Casino cash: $1001535	I'd give the comp pick we get for Carr to trade for Flynn if he agrees to restructure his contract. He's a backup QB--and we need one. Cassel and Quinn (not to mention Stanzi) don't even cut that mustard. Edit: This, of course, is assuming that he isn't cut outright. __________________ Mr. Irrelevant
Posts: 5,766

01-23-2013, 09:52 AM	#43
mcaj22 MVP Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Pennsylvania Casino cash: $45260	id rather use the 4th on drafting a starter at one of the many position holes on this crap team. we will already be taking a QB in the first, no need for one in the 4th when we can still get a starter there.
Posts: 5,969

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode