Home Mail MemberMap Chat (0) Wallpapers
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > The Lounge > Draft Planet

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2014, 09:38 AM  
DTLB58 DTLB58 is offline
DT CARD COLLECTOR
 
DTLB58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: ManCave
Casino cash: $5410
Draftg Tendencies

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/...medium=twitter

Pretty interesting article.

How does your team spend it's picks? Tony Villiotti

May 03, 2014, 07:00 AM EST


In reviewing data for the past 10 drafts, it is evident that there are differences among the NFL teams when it comes to drafting tendencies. How much of this a matter of circumstance and how much is a matter of strategy is impossible to determine, barring insight from a team’s decision makers.

I know some would argue that this analysis is best done at the level of individual General Managers or other appropriate decision maker on draft day. I will get around to doing that one of these days but I’m still sorting through some of the issues in such an article.

In this article, I will identify the teams that diverge from “the norm” along with some related anecdotal information. For purposes of this article I looked at draft rounds 1-3 as one group and then rounds 4-7 as a second group. Initially, I determined those norms for the 10-year study period. The following table presents that information. The first part of the table shows the percentage of draftees by playing position (e.g., 5.55% of all players drafted in the first three rounds were quarterbacks). The second part of the table shows the sources of the players that were drafted, with colleges divided into the same three categories that were used in prior articles.

The remainder of this article is divided into three sections for the purpose of discussion:

• Differences by Offensive/Defensive Splits
• Differences by Playing Position
• Differences by Source of Draftees

Differences by Offensive/Defensive Splits

My analysis shows that, on average, there are slightly more defensive players selected in the first three rounds and then an almost exactly even split in rounds four through seven. While only one team (the Bills) was perfectly balanced (same number of offensive and defensive players drafted), most teams are relatively balanced over the course of the entire draft during the 10-year study period. The 12 teams that are outside the norm and show a moderate preference for offense or defense for the entire draft during the study period are listed below:


• Offensive Preference
- Broncos (+11), Steelers (+9), Chiefs (+8), Ravens (+8)
• Defensive Preference
- Falcons (+13), Jaguars (+11), Titans (+11), Lions (+10), Browns (+8), Patriots (+8), Seahawks (+8)

Some teams show a preference either within the first three or final four rounds, but not when considering the draft as a whole. Four teams showed a net preference of seven draftees in the first three rounds. The 49ers were the only team with a significant offensive preference while the Jets, Patriots and Saints all had a defensive preference.

Eight teams showed a modest preference in rounds 4-7, evenly split between offense and defense. These teams are:

• Offensive Preference
- Jets (+13), Chargers (+11), Bengals (+8), Ravens (+8)
• Defensive Preference
- Browns (+12), Titans (+10), Falcons (+9), Jaguars (+8)

Differences by Playing Position

NFL teams also show differences in drafting players by playing position. These differences are discussed below. Before getting into a discussion of these differences I have to comment on what I consider to be the most surprising draft factoid that I came across in connection with this article. Jimmy Graham is the only tight end the Saints have drafted in the last 10 seasons (I didn’t check to see if it went back further than that). Talk about quitting when you are ahead!

Quarterbacks
• Only four teams (Bears, Cowboys, Saints, Texans) did not draft a QB in the first three rounds during the 10-year study period
• The Broncos drafted three QBs in the first three rounds and seven overall
- Their apparent strategy is to draft a QB in most years
• The Cowboys and Jaguars each drafted only one QB in the last 10 years

Running Backs
• The Broncos and Lions each drafted five RBs in the first three rounds
- Both teams apparently believe if you want a RB grab one early as Lions only drafted two RBs in rounds 4-7 and Broncos took three
• Half the teams drafted two RBs or fewer in the first three rounds of the 10-year study period
• Bears and Saints took the fewest RBs overall, with three each over the 10 years
• Redskins were the only team who didn’t draft a RB in the first three rounds but had only 20 selections

Wide Receivers
• Giants were in the “early or not at all” school of thought regarding WRs
- They drafted seven in the first three rounds and only one thereafter
• The Ravens and Bengals loaded up on receivers with 17 drafted by Ravens and 16 by Bengals
- 23 of the 33 were drafted in the final four rounds
• The Jets drafted only one receiver in first three rounds, lowest of any team
• The Browns, Chargers and Redskins drafted the fewest WRs overall with six each

Tight Ends
• 24 of the 32 teams drafted two TEs or fewer in first three rounds of the study period
• The Chiefs drafted four TEs in the first three rounds, highest of any team
• The Jaguars drafted only two TEs, one in the first three rounds

Offensive Linemen
• The Ravens and Eagles tended to load up on offensive linemen
- Ravens drafted 21 in 10 years, eight in first three rounds
- Eagles drafted 20 in 10 years, but only four in first three rounds
• The Titans opted to go late for offensive linemen as they used only 2 out of their 35 picks on offensive linemen in the first three rounds
• The Raiders only took offensive lineman early, drafting nine in first three rounds and only one afterwards
• The Jaguars drafted the fewest offensive linemen with only eight in 10 years, with five in rounds 1-3
• The Eagles and Packers drafted the most linemen in the last four year with 16 and 14, respectively

Defensive Linemen
• The Giants, Lions, Panthers and Titans all drafted nine defensive linemen in first three rounds
- Titans loaded up in last four rounds as well with 11 selected
• The Raiders and Redskins drafted only one defensive linemen each in first three rounds
- The Redskins also drafted only five in last four rounds, so maybe they do not highly value the position
• The Titans and the Seahawks drafted the most defensive linemen with 20 and 19
- 13 of the Seahawks draftees were in last four years, most of any team
• The Bills and the Jets stayed away from defensive linemen in later rounds with only three each

Linebackers
• The Ravens drafted significantly more linebackers (19) than any other NFL team
- 13 of those were selected in the final four rounds
• The Chargers, Cowboys and Steelers drafted the most linebackers in first three rounds with seven each
- The Bears, Browns, Dolphins and Vikings had the fewest with two each
• The Chiefs and the Jets drafted the fewest LBs overall with six each

Corners
• The Bears were the only team not to draft a corner in the first three rounds
- They selected nine in final four rounds
• The Falcons, Rams and Vikings drafted the most in first three rounds with seven each
• The Titans drafted the most corners overall with 14, but only four were in the first three rounds
• Eight teams (Bengals, Broncos, Cardinals, Chargers, Dolphins, Falcons, Rams and Vikings) all selected more corners in the first three round than in the final four rounds

Safeties
• The Dolphins are the only team not to draft a safety in the first three rounds
• The Patriots and Saints drafted the most safeties in the first three rounds with five
• The Lions did not draft any safeties in the final four rounds
• The Saints drafted only one safety in final four rounds
• The Cardinals drafted only two safeties overall

Differences by Source of Draftees

In any earlier article I reviewed the success rate for major college teams versus all other colleges. In that article I made the case that major college teams were more successful than other teams from automatic qualify BCS conferences, but about equally successful with all other colleges.

In this section I reviewed the sources of draftees for the NFL teams, both for the first three rounds and then for the final four rounds. A high reward/low risk strategy would be to select more players from Major Powers and Others. A lower reward/higher risk strategy would be to take more players from the 32 AQS colleges. The following table shows the teams with the highest and lowest risk strategies for the first three rounds and final four rounds. The percentages shown for the lowest risk strategy is the combined percentage of Major Powers and All Other draftees. The percentages shown for the higher risk strategy is the percentage of draftees from the 32 AQS colleges.

Low risk, of course, does not necessarily equal high rewards as you can see. The Broncos and Patriots, for example, both chose a more risky path in the first three rounds of the draft over the past 10 years and still managed to make it into the 2013 final four playoff teams.

Follow Tony on Twitter @draftmetrics
Posts: 7,495
DTLB58 would the whole thing.DTLB58 would the whole thing.DTLB58 would the whole thing.DTLB58 would the whole thing.DTLB58 would the whole thing.DTLB58 would the whole thing.DTLB58 would the whole thing.DTLB58 would the whole thing.DTLB58 would the whole thing.DTLB58 would the whole thing.DTLB58 would the whole thing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 09:59 AM   #2
planetdoc planetdoc is offline
Veteran
 

Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $5125
Although they looked at draft tendencies over the last 10yrs, the fact that management around the league (both GM and coaches) have changed makes their research invalid.
Posts: 1,994
planetdoc has disabled reputation
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 10:04 AM   #3
JASONSAUTO JASONSAUTO is offline
Thigpen for HOF
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: mid missouri
Casino cash: $18490
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc View Post
Although they looked at draft tendencies over the last 10yrs, the fact that management around the league (both GM and coaches) have changed makes their research invalid.
It all seems to stay the same though.

Chiefs and san Francisco qbs come to mind
Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 30,189
JASONSAUTO is obviously part of the inner Circle.JASONSAUTO is obviously part of the inner Circle.JASONSAUTO is obviously part of the inner Circle.JASONSAUTO is obviously part of the inner Circle.JASONSAUTO is obviously part of the inner Circle.JASONSAUTO is obviously part of the inner Circle.JASONSAUTO is obviously part of the inner Circle.JASONSAUTO is obviously part of the inner Circle.JASONSAUTO is obviously part of the inner Circle.JASONSAUTO is obviously part of the inner Circle.JASONSAUTO is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 10:09 AM   #4
O.city O.city is offline
Gonzo = Sexy Bitch
 
O.city's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $19373
I think you can use that as a tool to read into success vs failure of certain franchises.
Posts: 31,527
O.city has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.O.city has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.O.city has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.O.city has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.O.city has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.O.city has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.O.city has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.O.city has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.O.city has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.O.city has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.O.city has an IQ even higher than Frankie's.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 10:57 AM   #5
planetdoc planetdoc is offline
Veteran
 

Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $5125
Quote:
Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO View Post
It all seems to stay the same though.
citation needed.
Posts: 1,994
planetdoc has disabled reputation
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 11:05 AM   #6
Chief Roundup Chief Roundup is offline
Admitted Planet Junky
 
Chief Roundup's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mtn. Home AR
Casino cash: $10334
Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc View Post
Although they looked at draft tendencies over the last 10yrs, the fact that management around the league (both GM and coaches) have changed makes their research invalid.
Yes and no. The longer tenured coaches, Andy Reid and Bill Belichick, as well long tenured GMs would be able to give normal type data to compare the rest of the league against.
The Browns and Raiders type teams that are and or have been HC and GM turnstiles still generate data that can be compared against the better teams in the league. Generally GMs will get more than one coaching hire that will get 3 to 4 years each so a GM is around a large portion of that time frame.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaepernick View Post
I have to say, I MUCH prefer a moderated forum to an un-moderated forum.

This isn't a sports forum! It's an insane asylum!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead View Post
Alex Smith is really talented. BIG arm, very mobile.
Posts: 7,111
Chief Roundup Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Chief Roundup Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Chief Roundup Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Chief Roundup Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Chief Roundup Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Chief Roundup Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Chief Roundup Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Chief Roundup Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Chief Roundup Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Chief Roundup Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.Chief Roundup Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2014, 11:16 AM   #7
planetdoc planetdoc is offline
Veteran
 

Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $5125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Roundup View Post
Yes and no. The longer tenured coaches, Andy Reid and Bill Belichick, as well long tenured GMs would be able to give normal type data to compare the rest of the league against.
The Browns and Raiders type teams that are and or have been HC and GM turnstiles still generate data that can be compared against the better teams in the league. Generally GMs will get more than one coaching hire that will get 3 to 4 years each so a GM is around a large portion of that time frame.
Just looking at what a Gm does is not sufficient. A GM may or may not adjust who he drafts based on who the coach is as well as other factors (filling a need, win now mode, etc).

Simply put, for this data to be considered valid they need to look at all the variables instead of just a 10 yr window.
Posts: 1,994
planetdoc has disabled reputation
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 AM.


This is a test for a client's site.
A new website that shows member-created construction site listings that need fill or have excess fill. Dirt Monkey @ https://DirtMonkey.net
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.