![]() |
Well at least you didn't call it a theory. I really like Scott Free even though I think he hates me.
|
I like to keep an open mind.
|
Quote:
Guys like him work feverishly every single day on science that some of you, very arrogantly, want to call "wacko" or even say doesn't even exist at all as a research field, i dunno... guess i'll take one of our nations top scientists word, over a few Chiefsplanet know it alls. How about ufo's, its ever so popular to nail anyone mentioning the subject to the wall around here... well, watch the last ten minutes of that interview as Boyd tells the camera that one of his dearest friends shot a ufo down over New Mexico. Is he just making it up? yep, he's gotta be, why WOULDNT such an accomplished man lie about such a fantastic thing? |
Quote:
Just because he once worked for a reputable firm, that doesn't mean he's incapable of being full of shit. If you look into some of his claims, you see quite a bit of ridiculous bullshit. Someday in the future, we will have the capability to easily overcome gravity with negligible energy requirements. But it's absurd to think that we've already secretly developed these technologies and kept them hidden from the public, and nobody else has managed to figure it out. It just doesn't work that way. I want nothing more than for other life to be discovered in the universe, and for use to travel the stars. One day both will happen. But there is zero proof that it's happened yet, despite the crazy number of people who've been actively seeking it for over hundreds of years. |
Quote:
1) It is basically an appeal to authority which is a basic logical fallacy taught in a freshman level class and not how science operates. Science operates on evidence. Bring your evidence present it in front of the community and your argumment with stand or fall on its merits. 2) As far as authorities go, he isn't a particularly strong one. His claim to fame appears to be as one of the a patent holders on the stinger missile. A fine accomplishment but doesn't really make him an expert on UFOs and such. He is a technologist, but not really a scientist. I couldn't find any scientific publications in the peer reviewed literature by him. In summary, he has not presented sufficient evidence to enter his claim as part of the scientific discourse. |
To be a scientist is to keep one's mind 100% open, while at the same time remaining 100% skeptical about new claims outside the known body of knowledge. The skeptical part pertains to the observations made by the scientist him/herself.
100% open-minded + 100% skeptic = scientist |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm skeptical of your numbers since they add up to 200%. But I'm willing to consider your argument. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This is a horse conch... let the jokes commence...
http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/9186/dawo.jpg The Florida horse conch (Triplofusus giganteus) is one of the largest univalve gastropods in the entire world. Its shell can get up to 24 inches (60 cm) long and is found on the Atlantic coast of North America, ranging from North Carolina down to the Gulf of Mexico. They feed on other gastropods and can even be cannibalistic. Despite the shape of the shell (and the common name), this isn’t a true conch because it isn’t in the Strombidae family. |
Everyone had a favorite animal growing up...mine was the Florida horse conch.
|
This is the best thread in CP. Keep it up, guys.
|
Can we discover a food additive that when digested doesn't cause shit to stick to your ass and cause dingleberries??
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
you'll see it again..you've been warned. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ok, i'm going to post this and i will no longer sully this thread with any more "nonsense"... i'm going to introduce you to Colm Kelleher, a legitimate credentialed scientist with 38 peer reviewed papers.
He at one time headed up the scientific research team at the National Institute for Discovery Sciences, an arm of Bigelow Aerospace, one of the most successful aerospace firms in the nation. Much of their work centered around the notorious Skinwalker Ranch and surrounding areas in Utah, home to this day of a dizzying array of paranormal phenomena. Everything from animal mutilations to various aerial phenomena, disembodied voices, huge, unrecognizable creatures emerging from glowing portals in the ground, human guard and guard dog deaths and injuries, on and on it goes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colm_Kelleher http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...covery_Science Dr. Kelleher either witnessed or was nearby when all of the above things manifested themselves, he has never made any bones about it, in fact, he wrote a book with 12+ time Emmy winning journalist George Knapp about the experiences his team had. For instance, he personally, along with others watched the aforementioned huge, hairy creature emerge from a glowing hole in the ground. Feeling quite threatened, and wanting evidence, they allowed a big game hunter to fire on this creature several times with a high powered rifle... yet no blood was ever found and the creatures tracks simply vanished in an open field. <iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/ndLhFvM6CT0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/HP2ORvM9Bhs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> <iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/c0ANt5GuhZ4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> There are three more of these, but for the sake of brevity of included the last three, at any rate, everything I've said this man has seen and done, he has seen and done... its all in the book, which i've read. Now, before you ask "wheres the peer reviewed evidence/paper?"... his official explanation is that the unusual nature of all these things made it difficult to put that information together for scientific study. My guess is that Bigelow and the government aren't exactly keen on this info getting out into the mainstream, because there would be an uproar. But if you as a skeptic are going to be honest about this, you really have to ask yourself... "why would all of these highly respected men, a titan of aerospace, a world class scientist and a multiple award winning journalist, be so BOLD in freely admitting to what they saw and firmly believe to be true. WHY would they risk their hard earned names and reputations on something so out there like this, if they weren't ABSOLUTELY sure they stood on firm ground?" The bottom line is that our government and other top scientists are deeply involved in scientific research that mainstream scientists either don't WANT to know about because it doesn't fit their preconceived theories, or they don't WANT to talk about it for fear of ridicule from the mainstream community. There, i've had my final say on the matter, i have little doubt that most of you wont budge an inch on things of this nature and that's too bad for you, you're missing out on an incredibly exciting time for science. But hopefully, this will open a few eyes for those who are on the fence about issues like this. Knowledge Is Power |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://archive.org/details/LordDavi...anLife_HumanDi |
Quote:
|
Leave this thread alone with bullshit!!! Please
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Its outlandish, it strains a normal persons credulity to the breaking point, its SCARY... but it doesn't mean there isn't the curiosity, money, lack of scientific morals and want to, out there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
how dare you facepalm the words of an imaginary friend in the sky? |
This thread is about science.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BTW, we're done here ChiefsNow, back to your regularly scheduled program of "If Neil Tyson Didn't Say It, Its Bullshit" |
My uncle is Tom Miller, he has had the entire insides of cattle removed from a single hole as big as a softball.
http://www.chieftain.com/csp/mediapo...YPE=image/jpeg |
Quote:
I've looked at all the pictures and such that they have available, and it's your classic blurry stuff that could be interpreted as anything. You make the observation yourself that there isn't any peer-reviewed evidence. There's a perfectly logical reason for why it would be difficult to put that information together. Because again, the more crazy the claims, the better the evidence has to be to convince the scientific community. I know it's popular to think that the government would suppress info. But that's infinitely more difficult when the government isn't the one conducting it. The government certainly has projects that nobody knows about. But that's because they can tightly control their own experiments. They don't have that control over independent science establishments. Regarding why they might lie? That probably has a lot to do with the fact that they sold a book about it. Another established scientists named Frank Salisbury investigated the book's claims a bit, and here's what he found: Quote:
Again, without any actual evidence, this is simply a bunch of wild interesting claims. But it doesn't matter who makes the claims if there's still no evidence. And the fact that the intent was to write a book makes it even more questionable. If there really were insane things happening here like creatures crawling through portals, UFOs, killings, etc. Then show us the evidence. Show us other scientists in the field who agree with the evidence. Show us some consensus of it. I agree the guy is a very successful individual with participation in lots of legit stuff. But everything regarding the Skinwalker Ranch stuff is about as questionable as it gets. In the end, the claims sound really cool, but the evidence still isn't there and reputation doesn't make up for that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Wires ripped from the camera base, pvc pipe carrying the wires along the pole shredded... destroyed, all while they TRIED to watch. Tracks of a creature? you cant track something when the tracks of what you're tracking disappear in open ground. Camera footage of supernatural creatures, pictures of anything besides cattle mutiliations and balls of light... do you REALLY think the government or Bigelow wants that to get out? They might as well just tell the dumbass public that DEMONS AND ALIENS ARE HERE! - RUUUN!... of COURSE they aren't divulging exacting details, except to the appropriate government sources... do you really think Bigelow would be such a favorite of our government if he were some kind of radical who wants to give it all away to the PUBLIC? Neighbors of the ranch? theres a Mr. Garcia who owns an adjacent ranch who regularly talks to journalists and seekers, he readily confirms strange goings on... not weirdos stalking the place, but orbs, cattle mutilations etc. Fish, i firmly believe you to be a very sharp guy... but you. are. kidding. yourself about things you cant or don't want to understand... go read Kelleher and Knapps book, please just do it, then get back to me. |
LMAO i mean, good. grief. LMAO
Would Bob Bigelow be a favorite of our government, a top dog in national aeronautics, if he were out there supporting kook science?... get ****ing REAL. |
Oh, and he did mention he has lost upwards of 60 grand. With that kind of money involved, I'm pretty sure he keeps a close eye, as in looks for the missing cattle before the 2, 3 or 4 day's that it would take for that kind of decomposer. Again, I don't know but the guy is pretty smart with his money, that and neighbors with the same kind of loss dosent add up.
|
Quote:
You're either a part of it, or not as smart as you seem, Fish. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
This thread is full of amazing and borderline impossible things. So I fully acknowledge that anything is possible. But I cannot believe without any proof, no matter how awesome it would be if it were true. |
Quote:
|
First off, it IS science, proclaimed and written by real scientists, not only real but GOVERNMENT FUNDED scientists who're hooked into the government like few others before them.
Among other names associated with, interested in and have visited the ranch multiple times... Dr. Jacques Vallee, Hal Putoff, Col. John Alexander. If those men beyond the ones i've mentioned aren't enough to lend validity to the subject, if you DEMAND irrefuteable physical/pictorial proof then you are blind to just how deep and incredibly secretive our government can be... the "bomb", JFK, RFK?... they aren't SHIT compared to the compartmentalized apparatus they have around this. "This bumble**** government couldn't hide it"... dear Father, they hid an underground CITY beneath Chicago during the a-bomb experiments, in the 40's! you really think something like this is BEYOND this countries ability to hide? Swear on my Grandpa i'm done here, if you haven't bought a single thing i simply don't give a damn, too bad you're so locked into a comfortable worldview, where the US gov. is dumb as hell and life beyond our understanding is some kind of late night movie... still admire your persistence but, well... bye. |
Dude. I mean think about this for a second. Animals appearing out of wormholes that eat cameras and leave no footsteps because they disappear? Seriously the Scientologists are snickering at that one. Nothing is impossible but the UFO stories and zombies are above this on the believability curve.
|
Go ask some random working scientists what they think about the possibility of hairy beasts with glowing eyes emerging from inter-dimensional portals in the Utah countryside and how scientific that work is, and see how many refrain from laughing at you.
I didn't create the scientific standards. If a few people's alleged testimonies are enough for you to believe, then that's great. But it will never suffice for science in the eyes of the scientific majority. You act like the high standards and requirements for acceptance are my doing. Sorry, that's just the way it is. |
http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/2963/nnhm.jpg
Anti-aging compound: http://bit.ly/J7CTQ1 Galaxy arms: http://bit.ly/18GPrJM Crocodiles: http://bit.ly/1fz4YtZ Neanderthal genome: http://bit.ly/1a2cgCJ Flowering plants: http://bit.ly/J7CUn0 Hand bone: http://bit.ly/1bZHoWG Water on Mars: http://bit.ly/1bbkVSI Algae to oil: http://bit.ly/1icCpXo |
Happy birthday, Johannes Kepler!
http://img812.imageshack.us/img812/3567/lujb.jpg Kepler was born on this day in 1571. He was a German mathematician and astronomer who is most well known for his three laws of planetary motion, the first of which states that the planets orbit around the sun in ellipses. Though he was not the first to assert the heliocentric theory, he was able to determine information about the orbits mathematically based on the planet’s distance from the sun. Kepler is regarded as one of the most important astronomers of the 17th century. |
This thread has been shit for the last 2 pages. Wonder who/what caused it....
|
Quote:
FFS, Hal Putoff who's probably the most valid person out of the 3 is a scientologist and claims to have ESP! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
a) Masters in astrophysics b) part of the team that made the first detailed map of Mars c) computer networking leader who in essence helped develop the internet d) basis for the idealized character of lead scientist in Steven Spielbergs - Close Encounters of the Third Kind e) highly respected consultant for the US government on these matters In other words... a hack, a kook... if HE is interested in it, run far far away. Gosh, you got me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
No one is saying that he isn't smart. There are a bunch of smart people who have stupid/wild/crazy beliefs. |
Quote:
I give up... you win, Fish wins, i really don't care, have fun and Happy New Year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
No trace of foot or vehicle tracks, as if it came from out of nowhere... in most cases natural predators wont even touch the carcass. No bite or claw marks, no teeth marks on the bones, fore and aft legs broken into pieces but no bite or claw marks. Sweet mercy, if some of you would just look into it on your own... you want evidence, its out there, you just have to be WILLING to see it. Dammit, i SWEAR i'm trying to quit this thread... stop arguing and look into the facts o:-) |
Quote:
Alright, this is IT... pave your own path folks, if i post here again neg me into a red so deep it becomes deep maroon. |
Quote:
Pro Tip: IT'S A FALLACY. It is NOT an argument that will ever convince anyone of anything (with the obvious exception of people who never bother to think for themselves anyway). If you could point to a single shred of scientific evidence supporting the outrageous claims, that would be different. But offering up excuses and lame "explanations" for the lack of evidence isn't evidence. |
Quote:
|
This thread went from A+ to ****in suck real quick.
|
Quote:
Let me say what is easy to agree with Boyd Bushman. "Nature does not talk in English." Nor Hebrew either, But I picked up my copy of Gravitation by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler and turn to paged 14. "Other perturbaions had to be and were guarded against. 1) a bit of iron on the torsion balance as big as 10 raised to minus 3 cm n a side would have contributed, in EARTH"S magnetic field, a torgue a hundred times greater than the measured torque." This is in relation to precisely doing Galileo experiment measuring gravity fields. The Bushman demonstrations are not of Gravity fields being changed by Magnetism or Electromagnetism. They are all part of Electromagnetic Field Theory from Maxwell. Those fields don't negate gravity, they are additive or subtractive of the EFFECT of gravity. The third law of Newton is not universal. There is not a force equal and opposite always. Right Hand rule of Electromagnetism or Right Hand rule of spinning Angular Momentum from say a bicycle wheel or gyroscope. Bushman simply demonstrated the earth's magnetic field effect on falling objects with their own magnetic fields. The experiment from Gravitation is good to 10 to the minus 12 that the gravitational field itself does not differentiate between falling objects of diverse mass. Add some other field and yeah you can have a resultant effect that changes the movement. The fact you can put a balloon with static forces on a ceiling, or suspend two magnets doesn't produce anti gravity. Anymore than bournoulli's fluid laws which govern airplane flight over wings. As far as Atomic Airplanes, that is well known but flight part is based on aeronautics. |
By the way Feynmann owned the patents on Atomic powered submarines and airplanes. From his time working on the Manhattan Project.
|
Quote:
did you know that in the Bible it said to circumcise on the 8th day? know why?? |
Quote:
|
ITT: People who believe the Earth is 6000 years old lecturing people with advanced degrees in science about science.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Observe: when Moses melted down the golden calf and ground it into dust to make the Isrealites drink it..it turned RED...science recently caught up to this fact. |
:spock:
|
WTF? I thought this was a science geek thread?
|
My son is researching something for school along these lines. If we could stop even for a millisecond a proton's path, if thats even possible, the applications would be huge.
The possiblitiy to study other electrochemical systems with heterogeneous electrodes. http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v111/i16/e168301 Imaging the Proton Concentration and Mapping the Spatial Distribution of the Electric Field of Catalytic Micropumps |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
How sad is it that my "your mom" jokes directed at Fish represent the high water mark of this thread?
|
Why are Bible-beaters trolling this thread?
This thread isn't trying to debunk god. |
Quote:
|
I'm a scientist and have found myself enjoying the fact that a thread like this even exists, but WTF has happened over the last few pages? Get this train back on the tracks, folks. Do it in the name of science.
I'll help: Here's an interesting article on Positron Dynamics, a new company attempting to make antimatter a "workable" energy source. Controlled positron-electron annihilation could possibly pave the way for fusion catalysis. Intriguing possibilities abound. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.