ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Off-season WR possibilities (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=351517)

tredadda 01-02-2024 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coochie liquor (Post 17315267)
Tag and trade Jones for Scary Terry

I don’t think KC can tag and trade Jones anymore nor do I think they would even if they could. He will walk and KC will get a comp pick at most.

tredadda 01-02-2024 10:12 AM

We keep talking about WRs, but what are people’s thoughts on a TE being brought in as well?

duncan_idaho 01-02-2024 10:16 AM

I still think Marquise Brown is probably the best fit in FA for what KC would be looking for. He's fast and shifty and would be a major upgrade at the Z spot while also upgrading the deep ball game considerably. Plus, he has a miniscule drop rate as a pro despite playing with pretty unevenly accurate QBs. Pair that with another stab at WR in the draft and I think KC would be in business next year. Deep game would open back up, creating more room underneath for Kelce and Rice to do what they do best.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs (Post 17314873)
Mike Williams might be the more likely cut there

If you start playing around with their cap, they don't have a LOT of flexibility. I'm not sure how they get to solid operating status WITHOUT cutting Williams. And Allen. And Mack.

All 3 are on their last year of their deals, so restructuring doesn't really help unless you're creating void years to make it work, and I can't see a new coach willingly doing that for first-year success.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coochie liquor (Post 17315267)
Tag and trade Jones for Scary Terry

Why would Washington - which already has $20M+ committed to two separate DTs on their second contracts - want Chris Jones?

O.city 01-02-2024 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17315281)
I don't think a 1st rd WR is gonna be a difference maker in his first year and I would hate to 100% rely on just him.

Andy's offense is so complicated. Always has been for rookies from Rashee to Hardman to Tyreek to Jackson to Maclin.

I'm fine if they wanna draft a 1st rd WR but I want a vet and Rice in front of him leading the way so he can learn

Depends who it is.

I also think that's a bit overblown. If the guy can play, he'll get his as we've seen with the guys you listed.

O.city 01-02-2024 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17315301)
If you start playing around with their cap, they don't have a LOT of flexibility. I'm not sure how they get to solid operating status WITHOUT cutting Williams. And Allen. And Mack.

All 3 are on their last year of their deals, so restructuring doesn't really help unless you're creating void years to make it work, and I can't see a new coach willingly doing that for first-year success.

They're at a real tipping point. They either go full Saints, or they blow it up.

ForeverIowan 01-02-2024 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 17315082)
No way they are cutting Keenan. They wouldn't have a single reliable target if he was released.

Go look at their cap. They arent going to have a choice. They save near $25 mil by cutting a receiver who turns 32 this offseason. They will have a new front office and new coaching staff. They are in a full blown rebuild mode. 32 year old and extremely expensive Keenan Allen is not in their future plans.

Oxford 01-02-2024 10:28 AM

Brett Veach is a bottom feeder, his MO is to target guys he liked in the draft that went somewhere else and become available. He looks for projectables so I'd bet we'll see a WR in the draft and a whole bunch of lottery tickets in UFA.

O.city 01-02-2024 10:30 AM

Yeah, I'd love to pry Kyle Pitts away from the Falcons....somehow.

ForeverIowan 01-02-2024 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oxford (Post 17315320)
Brett Veach is a bottom feeder, his MO is to target guys he liked in the draft that went somewhere else and become available. He looks for projectables so I'd bet we'll see a WR in the draft and a whole bunch of lottery tickets in UFA.

If things go south in the playoffs I think Mahomes demands some veterans who know what the hell they are doing.

RunKC 01-02-2024 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17315305)
Depends who it is.

I also think that's a bit overblown. If the guy can play, he'll get his as we've seen with the guys you listed.

Sure. But I wouldn't trust a rookie WR opening day to be WR1 or WR2. I think that would be incredibly stupid

Hoover 01-02-2024 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 17315297)
We keep talking about WRs, but what are people’s thoughts on a TE being brought in as well?

This is where Veach could zag when people expect him to zig.

Kinda like the Thuney deal when everyone expected a LT

chiefzilla1501 01-02-2024 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oxford (Post 17315320)
Brett Veach is a bottom feeder, his MO is to target guys he liked in the draft that went somewhere else and become available. He looks for projectables so I'd bet we'll see a WR in the draft and a whole bunch of lottery tickets in UFA.

Whenever a position group is in crisis you always see veach bet big. If be shocked if he doesn't make a statement. I imagine half overhaul with 1-2 big moves

O.city 01-02-2024 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17315326)
Sure. But I wouldn't trust a rookie WR opening day to be WR1 or WR2. I think that would be incredibly stupid

Depends who it is. Ideally, we'd have a vet to ease it in, but if somehow they got Malik nabers, he's a day 1 guy.

Or Odunze

duncan_idaho 01-02-2024 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoover (Post 17315331)
This is where Veach could zag when people expect him to zig.

Kinda like the Thuney deal when everyone expected a LT

I don't think that TE is available in free agency. Not a super impressive class.

It would have to be a trade or something to bring in a difference-maker at TE.

GloucesterChief 01-02-2024 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17315368)
I don't think that TE is available in free agency. Not a super impressive class.

It would have to be a trade or something to bring in a difference-maker at TE.

If the Ravens have really liked what they see from Likely, Andrews may be available.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.