![]() |
Quote:
|
Really just drives me up the wall that the same people that were pining for DeSean Jackson are worried about this guy's height and weight when they're virtually identical size.
|
Anyone who thinks this kid is not better than DMC is crazy. He will be twice as good at WR. Clearly an upgrade.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also now his measurements say he is 5'10 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
McCluster's college highlights are just as impressive as Thomas'. <iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/8jvhA7hPT9I?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> If you want an apples to apples comparison, here is their NFL Combine numbers: McCluster 5'9" 172 lbs. Arms: 29 1/4" Hands: 8 3/8" 40: 4.58 Vertical: 37.5" Broad: 118" Bench: 20 reps Thomas 5'9" 174 lbs. Arms: 29 7/8" Hands: 8 1/8" 40: 4.50 Vertical: 32" Broad: 124" Bench: 8 reps The thing that worries me about Thomas is that his final season at Oregon was his worst in terms of statistics/production. Lowest rushing total, lowest reception/yardage total, lowest average yards from scrimmage, half of the touchdowns he had the previous season, etc. Thomas 2013: Rushing: 96 attempts 594 yards 8 TDs Receiving: 22 receptions 246 yards 1 TD Scrimmage: 118 plays 840 yards 7.1 ypa 9 TDs McCluster 2009: Rushing: 181 attempts 1169 yards 8 TDs Receiving: 44 receptions 520 yards 3 TDs Scrimmage: 225 plays 1689 yards 7.5 ypa 11 TDs |
Thomas injured his ankle earlier in the year and was kind of phased out of the offense. There's really nothing else to it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Here is another similarity you'll probably find fun... DeSean Jackson... 5'10 179 |
Quote:
|
And yes...I'm a duck fan and have followed his college career..hate losing him early BUT I can take it with him now being a Chief!!!!
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.