![]() |
IIRC the 2 broads making the biggest stink about the Redskins name said something to the effect that the Chiefs name should be changed as well. I believe there was a thread on it somewhere in the bowels of the planet.
|
Quote:
Seriously. These mother****ers bitch more than the mother****ers they bitch about. |
To quote my dawg Pablo, or is it Brock? I swear those two are the same dude..
"The world around me is changing and I'm scared!" |
I think it's more than that.
The Cardinals have also been around the NFL forever, even though they've changed cities a handful of times. If the Bidwells went crazy and were like, "We're sick of being the Cardinals, so we're getting a new name and a new brand," would anybody care? I mean, some people would find it interesting, and it'd definitely be worth talking about, but would anybody get FURIOUSLY upset the way they do when talking about the Redskins being forced with a name change? What's the difference between the Cardinals in this hypothetical and the Redskins? They're not teams you care about. Why go on this penis-pounding tirade where you ask ridiculous questions like, "What's so offensive about 'Redskins?" |
I think it's the fact that it is the government that is telling me it's offensive. I understand why some find it offensive I just don't need the government to tell me it is.
If Snyder wants to change the name of his team then I'm all in but it shouldn't be forced. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The Washington Lobbyist The Washington Corporate one who sucks the peniss any of those work for you? |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I always thought they should just go with the Hogs. Fits their fans, and also fits DC with the pork reference.
|
So the article linked in the OP shows a black man in an article about alleged racism towards Native Americans....
I'm so confused |
Quote:
Crazy world. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.