It was. But in your emotional state, I'm not surprised to find you're suddenly dealing with a little amnesia.

You did it first

LMAO

Didn't care or bother to read it, especially because the poster name wasn't mine.


If you are still upset at something I said months ago completely unrelated to this thread you are welcome to start a callout thread.


;)

Here you go.

What I said:

The argument wasn't about impossibility but why make things harder on yourself?

Same holds true this year. Sure, we can win making Mahomes a game manager, running the ball, and playing defense but just adding one or two guys that can catch and the offense elite allows us to crush teams instead of holding on and waiting for a mistake to win by a FG.

We also won 2 SB's without going 16 straight drives in playoff games without a TD.


Winning with defense and mediocre offense in today's NFL gives you less room for error.
__________________
Emotional angry change of subject and callout for posts unrelated that made you sad months ago.



I think it's cute of you, as grown woman, to umbrella out your pencil skirt to provide uterine defilade for yourself and the CP army of candy asses that lamented the loss of the season after the first game.

The truth is, that thread was started by a screaming hormonal Karen, was constantly updated by the army of Karen's who declared the players "Utter human shit", and that Mahomes should "march into veach's office and DeMaNd better players and that the Chiefs "wasted a season of prime Mahomes".

Now, I do believe that you, in a moment of clarity, probably enlightened by your HRT, did make the point that the Chiefs were making it more difficult than it had to be.

So, I hope you and the ladies bridge club have a fine Saturday evening.



I realize that you don't understand what "changing the subject" means so I just left this here for others to see what you did.


Later.

<div class="tenor-gif-embed" data-postid="14308426" data-share-method="host" data-aspect-ratio="1.78" data-width="50%"><a href="https://tenor.com/view/tell-me-more-michael-scott-the-office-gif-14308426">Tell Me More Michael Scott GIF</a>from <a href="https://tenor.com/search/tell+me+more-gifs">Tell Me More GIFs</a></div> <script type="text/javascript" async src="https://tenor.com/embed.js"></script>

Lol, you're a freaking clairvoyant, sir. Please send me the lotto numbers for powerball next week. Daddy needs a new bag . . .

You used the concept incorrectly.

If you want to understand what Dunning-Kruger is and how it applies you will actually have to learn on your own.


It does NOT mean if someone thinks someone is stupid then the person who thinks the other is stupid is stupid and the other is smart.

That's why I said you must have learned this on Reddit or somewhere random but it is clear you don't understand it.

Smart move.

They say you can't teach an old dog new tricks.

Or in this case what a "change of subject" is.


If you don't know now I ain't going to be able to help you.


LMAO

That's quite a tangle of someones and others

You really are a confused woman. It's okay. I'm here to help you.

[QUOTE=WilliamTheIrish;17481051]You really are a confused woman. It's okay. I'm here to help you.[/QUOTE]



I'm glad you have a computer and they changed your clothes today.


Congrats.

Serious question, is English your first language?

While I'm a typical American who only learned English, I lack the perspective of having to translate things into a native language along with meaning/context; but I do try to understand the best I can.

That seems to be the case here, where instead of applying what DK actually means to what I said, you completely misinterpreted what I said and interpreted it in a way that doesn't make any sense.

So, either that's ironically the best example of meta-DK DK I've seen, or there's a serious challenge interpreting words on a screen... but, I want to be sensitive to any language barriers and not assume things.

Back to the OP...

Thought this was interesting form "how bout those CHIEFS"


https://youtu.be/YMu2Qw4dx98?si=DmwUePUtQFf7qSWI


https://youtu.be/F6dJkq_AXHE?si=BwWyk1Ajw3uuN-YN

Of course I am NOT taking this "lightly" but hope maybe? :thumb:

Interesting gambit.

But no, I don’t think you understand what Dunning-Kruger findings mean OR how to apply them in real life.

And I’m no expert on the paper but IQ is not an area of expertise. It is not a discipline to work in. You are born with it.


Calling someone dumb because they think they are smarter than your buddy is not understanding the concept.

Let’s say you go fishing for the first time. You may think you are better than you are and the person teaching you may underestimate their ability but it does not follow that if the teacher thinks they are better than the student at fishing they are wrong.