![]() |
Quote:
We still need speed options but with ridley and rice, arguably we can get some value out of specialists like toney as a gadget or mecole as a speed option. Or, more preferably, we can draft a speed option who can contribute right away |
Quote:
If Ridley is moved they can tag him and the you are paying draft capital for a lower end #1 AND you have to pay a big contract. Would rather get Hollywood in that case. |
Quote:
Toney for obvious reasons and they almost never used him as a vert threat (I think he could be they don't think so...) Hardman also not really a vert threat but maybe they can just have him run faast down the field and catch one now and then. He also has been mostly a gadget play guy here whose role is now absorbed by Rice. It's not that these guys can't do it but our coaches don't believe in them as vert threats. |
Quote:
|
I don’t think it’s a given that the 49ers let either guy go.
Not while Purdy is free |
Quote:
|
I think we might be making this harder than it needs to be. Mike Evans is a first ballot HOFer. One of the best receivers of his era. 1,000+ yards every single year of his career. Outside of Brady played with mostly garbage at QB. Coming off one of his best seasons ever.
Prioritize Mike Evans in free agency on a two year deal. Draft a 1st round receiver. Hope Rashee Rice takes a huge leap from year 1 to year 2. Your receiving core goes from the worst in the league to one ofnthe best. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Youth, explosion and energy in Pacheco, Rice, Toney, 1st round receiver. Bring Hardman back and get him back to his role as one of the best gadget players in the league. |
Quote:
I don't think he's the splash WR1 we necessary need to pay huge money to, but he could be that vet that we get on discount coming back to the Midwest with hopes of being on a Super Bowl contending team. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't think Mike Evans accepts a 2 year deal, I think he will want a 4 year deal and at his age, you could be paying for as many years of decline as 1k yard seasons. The Buccs have plenty of cap room, and he has been there his whole career, they have the inside track to sign him and you are going to have to overpay to try and pry him away. Also, do you really think Rice needs to take a "huge" leap forward?? |
Quote:
the thing is, barring injury, Evans is a guy whose game will be effective longer. He's not a burner, never has been. He uses his size and his football intelligence to make plays. Now, I'm not certain he's the way KC should go, but he's so consistent and it's not about any physical attributes that are going to fall off. |
Quote:
If you gave him a 4 year deal, he would be the same age as Kelce is this year in that final season. I am sure Evans could still be an asset at 33-34 because of his play style, but I am not sure he could be the #1 receiver that people are actually clamoring for. |
Guys that get separation are who they'll target.
There's gonna be some guys traded this offseason, Dunno if we'll be involved or not though. I have a real fear that Rome Odunze ends up in Cinci. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.