If the Chiefs had lost their last 5 games....

[KChiefs1]

instead of winning 4/5...they'd have the 2nd pick in the draft! I predicted when they were 3-8 that they'd end up either 7-9 or 8-8 just to screw up their draft position! :banghead:

[Nzoner]

I wouldn't trade the sweep of the Raiders or the thrashing of the Donks for any draft position.

[DTLB58]

Carl would have never got the #2 pick overall signed before he retires!

[Alphaman]

Has anyone fathomed the thought that if the Chiefs had ended 3-13 (losing 7 or 8 in a row), that Roaf and Shields might have retired?

[ROYC75]

Damn, If the Chiefs had of won there 1st 5 games they lost we could have been 12 - 4 ..........


You Play to win, losing is for losers !

[Bosko]

Roy is right. Playing to lose for high draft picks is a losers mentality. The mighty Orange have only had 2 top ten picks in the last 30 years and still have back-to-back Super Bowl wins. We've only had 7 top ten picks in our entire history.

[Mr. Laz]

You Play to win, losing is for losers !

what a brilliant and insightful comment :p

[beavis]

Roy is right. Playing to lose for high draft picks is a losers mentality. The mighty Orange have only had 2 top ten picks in the last 30 years and still have back-to-back Super Bowl wins. We've only had 7 top ten picks in our entire history.
You've gotta love these 1 week benders the Donk fans go on before they come crashing back to Earth. ROFL

[Logical]

Has anyone fathomed the thought that if the Chiefs had ended 3-13 (losing 7 or 8 in a row), that Roaf and Shields might have retired?

That is the only legitimate argument I can think of, but at best it is wild speculation.

[whoman69]

Roy is right. Playing to lose for high draft picks is a losers mentality. The mighty Orange have only had 2 top ten picks in the last 30 years and still have back-to-back Super Bowl wins. We've only had 7 top ten picks in our entire history.
Bosko is right, but they do have that cheated on the salary cap thing that negates their championships.

[ROYC75]

I want players on our team that are use to winning and know they can, not wondering if we can.

With that being said, It's hard to do with an _efense like we have.

CP must address all he can in the FA and pick the best available athletes from the draft that can help us in minimal time.

[Bosko]

My point is that you can be competitive for a long time with late draft picks, or you can suck for a long time with good draft picks. Cincinnati over the last 10-15 years comes to mind. Tampa Bay before them. It's a crapshoot.

[greg63]

I want players on our team that are use to winning and know they can, not wondering if we can.

With that being said, It's hard to do with an _efense like we have.

CP must address all he can in the FA and pick the best available athletes from the draft that can help us in minimal time.


<B><FONT COLOR="red"><FONT SIZE=7>CP wouldn't know his butt from a hole in the ground.</B></FONT></FONY>

[Rausch]

But, I thought it didn't matter where we picked because Peterson would screw up the pick anyway...

[Manila-Chief]

My point is that you can be competitive for a long time with late draft picks, or you can suck for a long time with good draft picks. Cincinnati over the last 10-15 years comes to mind. Tampa Bay before them. It's a crapshoot.

What pick do you consider Elway? He was a number one pick and he is the reason you won those S.B.s!!!

And, you will be one and done this year as well. Medicority at is lowest!!!!!

[whoman69]

<B><FONT COLOR="red"><FONT SIZE=7>CP wouldn't know his butt from a hole in the ground.</B></FONT></FONY>
Sure he would. He put all our hopes and dreams in the hole.

[MadMax]

But, I thought it didn't matter where we picked because Peterson would screw up the pick anyway...



You know it's true... ROFL
I'm gonna kidnap Peterhead on draft day and skull fock him so someone else can make the " right " decisions :thumb: We need a TE, I thought you knew that. :p