PDA

View Full Version : Who is inactive tonight for the Chiefs?

runnercyclist
09-18-2005, 05:22 PM
How do find this info?
Coach
09-18-2005, 05:23 PM
Chiefs Inactives:
3rd QB - 11 Damon Huard
LB 53 Kris Griffin
T 71 Will Svitek
T 72 Jeremy Parquet
T 77 Willie Roaf
WR 85 Marc Boerigter
DT 90 Ryan Sims
DE 95 Khari Long

Raiders Inactives:
3rd QB - 16 Andrew Walter
WR 10 Carlos Francis
WR 19 Johnnie Morant
RB 20 Justin Fargas
CB 25 Denard Walker
G 71 Corey Hulsey
WR 85 Doug Gabriel
DT 90 Terdell Sands

http://www.kcchiefs.com/news/2005/09/18/game_summary_raiders/

chiefs.com had Ryan Sim's number as 95. Heh heh.
Skip Towne
09-18-2005, 05:24 PM
Boerighter is one.
petegz28
09-18-2005, 05:25 PM
Again one must ask why is Bo sitting down???
Frazod
09-18-2005, 05:25 PM
Boerighter is one.

:cuss:
Bootlegged
09-18-2005, 05:25 PM
What the hell is wrong w/Bo? I thought we keep him on the 53 because he's a standout gunner on ST? Is Horn that much better?
dirk digler
09-18-2005, 05:25 PM
I don't understand the thinking of not playing Boe. IMO he is alot better receiver/ST player than Horn.
petegz28
09-18-2005, 05:26 PM
They Chiefs are obsessed with sending a 5'8" receiver over the middle. I mean why send someone big like Bo over the middle?
leviw
09-18-2005, 05:27 PM
I just want 30 seconds with Mr. and Mrs. Sands before I die to ask "Why name your son Terdell? Why?"
Shag
09-18-2005, 05:27 PM
Wonder if Bo did something to get in the doghouse. Doesn't make much sense to have him inactive - we need him for our 5-wide sets... :)
Bob Dole
09-18-2005, 05:28 PM
They Chiefs are obsessed with sending a 5'8" receiver over the middle. I mean why send someone big like Bo over the middle?

Because he's a valuable ST contributor and we don't want to get him hurt.

:rolleyes:
ILChief
09-18-2005, 05:30 PM
I don't understand the thinking of not playing Boe. IMO he is alot better receiver/ST player than Horn.

I bet in a couple of weeks, Fred Ex will be back and Boerigter will be history. Something's up.
dirk digler
09-18-2005, 05:32 PM
I bet in a couple of weeks, Fred Ex will be back and Boerigter will be history. Something's up.

I would take Boe over Mitchell any day.
HolmeZz
09-18-2005, 05:34 PM
Morant, Francis, and Gabriel all inactive?

So much for the talk of Oakland spreading us out on defense. :rolleyes:
petegz28
09-18-2005, 05:34 PM
Because he's a valuable ST contributor and we don't want to get him hurt.




:rolleyes:


K now you are just using too much logic. STOP IT!
petegz28
09-18-2005, 05:35 PM
Morant, Francis, and Gabriel all inactive?

So much for the talk of Oakland spreading us out on defense. :rolleyes:


That still leaves them with Moss, Porter, Whited and Curry right?
HolmeZz
09-18-2005, 05:39 PM
Forgot about Whited.
Rudy tossed tigger's salad
09-18-2005, 06:09 PM
Horn must give good head
milkman
09-18-2005, 06:17 PM
Horn must give good head

Are you saying that Horn blows?
Rudy tossed tigger's salad
09-18-2005, 06:29 PM
Are you saying that Horn blows?
yes
jAZ
09-18-2005, 06:37 PM
Chiefs Inactives:
3rd QB - 11 Damon Huard
...

Raiders Inactives:
3rd QB - 16 Andrew Walter
...
So what happens if either/both team loses 2 QB's to injury? Who's the 3rd active QB?
chop
09-18-2005, 07:29 PM
So what happens if either/both team loses 2 QB's to injury? Who's the 3rd active QB?


Huard is the emergency QB. If he comes in that means he has to play the rest of the game.
jAZ
09-18-2005, 07:55 PM
Huard is the emergency QB. If he comes in that means he has to play the rest of the game.
So it's *possible* to play an inactive player, but only as an emergency? Is that limited to the QB position? And do they have to designate that player as the Emergency QB or is it assumed?

Just curious.